Literature DB >> 23182684

Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals?

Marta Szulkin1, Katie V Stopher, Josephine M Pemberton, Jane M Reid.   

Abstract

Animal ecologists commonly assume that the reduced fitness that often afflicts inbred offspring will inevitably cause selection for inbreeding avoidance. Although early empirical studies often reported inbreeding avoidance, recent studies suggest that animals sometimes show no avoidance or even prefer to mate with relatives. However, current theory is insufficient to predict whether animals should avoid, tolerate, or prefer inbreeding and hence to understand overall inbreeding strategy. Furthermore, quantifying inbreeding strategy is challenging, requiring relatedness among unbiased sets of actual and potential mates to be accurately estimated. Here, we highlight key limitations of current theory and empirical tests, and summarise the advances required to predict, quantify, and understand animal inbreeding strategies.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23182684     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  47 in total

1.  Monkeys spontaneously discriminate their unfamiliar paternal kin under natural conditions using facial cues.

Authors:  Dana Pfefferle; Anahita J N Kazem; Ralf R Brockhausen; Angelina V Ruiz-Lambides; Anja Widdig
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Parental care buffers against inbreeding depression in burying beetles.

Authors:  Natalie Pilakouta; Seonaidh Jamieson; Jacob A Moorad; Per T Smiseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  On some genetic consequences of social structure, mating systems, dispersal, and sampling.

Authors:  Bárbara R Parreira; Lounès Chikhi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Population properties affect inbreeding avoidance in moose.

Authors:  Ivar Herfindal; Hallvard Haanes; Knut H Røed; Erling J Solberg; Stine S Markussen; Morten Heim; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Isolating the roles of movement and reproduction on effective connectivity alters conservation priorities for an endangered bird.

Authors:  Ellen P Robertson; Robert J Fletcher; Christopher E Cattau; Bradley J Udell; Brian E Reichert; James D Austin; Denis Valle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  No signs of inbreeding despite long-term isolation and habitat fragmentation in the critically endangered Montseny brook newt (Calotriton arnoldi).

Authors:  E Valbuena-Ureña; A Soler-Membrives; S Steinfartz; P Orozco-terWengel; S Carranza
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  The efficiency of close inbreeding to reduce genetic adaptation to captivity.

Authors:  K Theodorou; D Couvet
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Why inclusive fitness can make it adaptive to produce less fit extra-pair offspring.

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Maternal effects alter the severity of inbreeding depression in the offspring.

Authors:  Natalie Pilakouta; Per T Smiseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Temporal dynamics of competitive fertilization in social groups of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) shed new light on avian sperm competition.

Authors:  Rômulo Carleial; Grant C McDonald; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; Yunke Wang; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.