Literature DB >> 21521199

Mate choice for optimal (k)inbreeding.

Mikael Puurtinen1.   

Abstract

Mating between related individuals results in inbreeding depression, and this has been thought to select against incestuous matings. However, theory predicts that inbreeding can also be adaptive if it increases the representation of genes identical by descent in future generations. Here, I recapitulate the theory of inclusive fitness benefits of incest, and extend the existing theory by deriving the stable level of inbreeding in populations practicing mate choice for optimal inbreeding. The parsimonious assumptions of the model are that selection maximizes inclusive fitness, and that inbreeding depression is a linear function of homozygosity of offspring. The stable level of inbreeding that maximizes inclusive fitness, and is expected to evolve by natural selection, is shown to be less than previous theory suggests. For wide range of realistic inbreeding depression strengths, mating with intermediately related individuals maximizes inclusive fitness. The predicted preference for intermediately related individuals as reproductive partners is in qualitative agreement with empirical evidence from mate choice experiments and reproductive patterns in nature.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21521199     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01217.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  22 in total

Review 1.  The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Inbreeding and the evolution of sociality in arthropods.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Tabadkani; Jamasb Nozari; Mathieu Lihoreau
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-08-23

3.  Why inclusive fitness can make it adaptive to produce less fit extra-pair offspring.

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?

Authors:  Thomas M M Versluys; Ewan O Flintham; Alex Mas-Sandoval; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Cross-cousin marriage among the Yanomamö shows evidence of parent-offspring conflict and mate competition between brothers.

Authors:  Napoleon A Chagnon; Robert F Lynch; Mary K Shenk; Raymond Hames; Mark V Flinn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Meta-analytic evidence that animals rarely avoid inbreeding.

Authors:  Raïssa A de Boer; Regina Vega-Trejo; Alexander Kotrschal; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  What happens after inbreeding avoidance? Inbreeding by rejected relatives and the inclusive fitness benefit of inbreeding avoidance.

Authors:  A Bradley Duthie; Jane M Reid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Visual phenotype matching: cues to paternity are present in rhesus macaque faces.

Authors:  Anahita J N Kazem; Anja Widdig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Incestuous sisters: mate preference for brothers over unrelated males in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Adeline Loyau; Jérémie H Cornuau; Jean Clobert; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temporal population genetics of time travelling insects: a long term study in a seed-specialized wasp.

Authors:  Marie Suez; Cindy Gidoin; François Lefèvre; Jean-Noël Candau; Alain Chalon; Thomas Boivin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.