Literature DB >> 20731715

Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis.

Charles W Fox1, David H Reed.   

Abstract

Inbreeding-environment interactions occur when inbreeding leads to differential fitness loss in different environments. Inbred individuals are often more sensitive to environmental stress than are outbred individuals, presumably because stress increases the expression of deleterious recessive alleles or cellular safeguards against stress are pushed beyond the organism's physiological limits. We examined inbreeding-environment interactions, along two environmental axes (temperature and rearing host) that differ in the amount of developmental stress they impose, in the seed-feeding beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. We found that inbreeding depression (inbreeding load, L) increased with the stressfulness of the environment, with the magnitude of stress explaining as much as 66% of the variation in inbreeding depression. This relationship between L and developmental stress was not explainable by an increase in phenotypic variation in more stressful environments. To examine the generality of this experimental result, we conducted a meta-analysis of the available data from published studies looking at stress and inbreeding depression. The meta-analysis confirmed that the effect of the environment on inbreeding depression scales linearly with the magnitude of stress; a population suffers one additional lethal equivalent, on average, for each 30% reduction in fitness induced by the stressful environment. Studies using less-stressful environments may lack statistical power to detect the small changes in inbreeding depression. That the magnitude of inbreeding depression scales with the magnitude of the stress applied has numerous repercussions for evolutionary and conservation genetics and may invigorate research aimed at finding the causal mechanism involved in such a relationship.
© 2010 The Author(s). Evolution© 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20731715     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01108.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  98 in total

1.  Functional characterization of gynodioecy in Fragaria vesca ssp. bracteata (Rosaceae).

Authors:  Junmin Li; Matthew H Koski; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Reduction in the cumulative effect of stress-induced inbreeding depression due to intragenerational purging in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L S Enders; L Nunney
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Spatial heterogeneity in the strength of selection against deleterious alleles and the mutation load.

Authors:  D Roze
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  Effects of genotypic and phenotypic variation on establishment are important for conservation, invasion, and infection biology.

Authors:  Anders Forsman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Parental care buffers against inbreeding depression in burying beetles.

Authors:  Natalie Pilakouta; Seonaidh Jamieson; Jacob A Moorad; Per T Smiseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Circular mating as an option for the genetic management of captive populations: response to Caballero et al.

Authors:  K Theodorou; D Couvet
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  The risk of forcing inbreeding in conservation programmes: a reply to Theodorou and Couvet.

Authors:  A Caballero; I Bravo; J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Sex-specific effects of inbreeding on reproductive senescence.

Authors:  Raïssa A de Boer; Marcel Eens; Wendt Müller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Inbred burying beetles suffer fitness costs from making poor decisions.

Authors:  Jon Richardson; Pauline Comin; Per T Smiseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  How much gene flow is needed to avoid inbreeding depression in wild tiger populations?

Authors:  John Kenney; Fred W Allendorf; Charles McDougal; James L D Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.