Literature DB >> 32394520

A numerical strategy to evaluate performance of predictive scores via a copula-based approach.

Yilong Zhang1, Yongzhao Shao2.   

Abstract

Assessing and comparing the performance of correlated predictive scores are of current interest in precision medicine. Given the limitations of available theoretical approaches for assessing and comparing the predictive accuracy, numerical methods are highly desired which, however, have not been systematically developed due to technical challenges. The main challenges include the lack of a general strategy on effectively simulating many kinds of correlated predictive scores each with some given level of predictive accuracy in either concordance index or the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curves (AUC). To fill in this important knowledge gap, this paper is to provide a general copula-based numeric framework for assessing and comparing predictive performance of correlated predictive or risk scores. The new algorithms are designed to effectively simulate correlated predictive scores with given levels of predictive accuracy as measured in terms of concordance indices or time-dependent AUC for predicting survival outcomes. The copula-based numerical strategy is convenient for numerically evaluating and comparing multiple measures of predictive accuracy of correlated risk scores and for investigating finite-sample properties of test statistics and confidence intervals as well as assessing for optimism of given performance measures using cross-validation or bootstrap.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  concordance index; predictive accuracy measure; risk scores; time-dependent AUC; vine copula

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32394520      PMCID: PMC7478334          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  16 in total

1.  Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker.

Authors:  P J Heagerty; T Lumley; M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Comparing two correlated C indices with right-censored survival outcome: a one-shot nonparametric approach.

Authors:  Le Kang; Weijie Chen; Nicholas A Petrick; Brandon D Gallas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.

Authors:  Patrick J Heagerty; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Estimation of time-dependent area under the ROC curve for long-term risk prediction.

Authors:  Lloyd E Chambless; Guoqing Diao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Concordance measure and discriminatory accuracy in transformation cure models.

Authors:  Yilong Zhang; Yongzhao Shao
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Tianxi Cai; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Circulating tumor cell biomarker panel as an individual-level surrogate for survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Glenn Heller; Arturo Molina; Gerhardt Attard; Daniel C Danila; Xiaoyu Jia; Weimin Peng; Shahneen K Sandhu; David Olmos; Ruth Riisnaes; Robert McCormack; Tomasz Burzykowski; Thian Kheoh; Martin Fleisher; Marc Buyse; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; R M Califf; D B Pryor; R A Rosati
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1984 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Comparing paired biomarkers in predicting quantitative health outcome subject to random censoring.

Authors:  Xinhua Liu; Zhezhen Jin; Joseph H Graziano
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.