| Literature DB >> 32390070 |
R C Bakker1,2, R Bastiaannet1, S A van Nimwegen3, A D Barten-van Rijbroek1, R J J Van Es2,4, A J W P Rosenberg2, H W A M de Jong1, M G E H Lam1, J F W Nijsen5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microspheres loaded with radioactive 166Ho (166Ho-MS) are novel particles for radioembolisation and intratumoural treatment. Because of the limited penetration of β radiation, quantitative imaging of microsphere distribution is crucial for optimal intratumoural treatment. Computed tomography (CT) may provide high-resolution and fast imaging of the distribution of these microspheres, with lower costs and widespread availability in comparison with current standard single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) and magnetic resonance imaging. This phantom study investigated the feasibility of CT quantification of 166Ho-MS.Entities:
Keywords: Brachytherapy, Head and neck neoplasms; Humans; Radioisotopes, Tomography (x-ray computed)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32390070 PMCID: PMC7211782 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-020-00157-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol Exp ISSN: 2509-9280
Phantom Ho quantification
| Ho microspheres (18.7%) in agar | Ho microspheres (17.6%) in agar | Ho chloride (43.47%) in water | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ho | HU | Ho | HU | Ho | HU |
| mg/mL | Mean ± SD | mg/mL | Mean ± SD | mg/mL | Mean ± SD |
| 0.00 | -2.6 ± 8.0 | 0.00 | 10.1 ± 7.5 | 0.00 | 1.9 ± 6.6 |
| 0.16 | -0.7 ± 9.9 | 0.14 | 12.5 ± 7.1 | 0.13 | 3.4 ± 6.5 |
| 0.25 | 2.2 ± 6.9 | 0.26 | 15.3 ± 6.1 | 0.25 | 9.5 ± 5.8 |
| 0.53 | 20.8 ± 6.8 | 0.52 | 20.9 ± 7.6 | 0.50 | 18.4 ± 7.1 |
| 1.00 | 37.3 ± 7.1 | 1.05 | 30.3 ± 8.8 | 1.00 | 34.1 ± 6.9 |
| 2.00 | 65.9 ± 7.1 | 2.10 | 79.9 ± 7.2 | 2.00 | 72.2 ± 6.3 |
| 4.02 | 148.2 ± 8.2 | 4.19 | 158.4 ± 8.1 | 4.00 | 145.7 ± 6.9 |
| 5.99 | 215.3 ± 13.4 | 6.28 | 239.7 ± 9.5 | 6.01 | 223.4 ± 7.2 |
| 8.01 | 283.9 ± 16.8 | 8.37 | 321.4 ± 9.4 | 8.01 | 301.1 ± 8.2 |
| 9.99 | 372.4 ± 14.1 | 10.47 | 383.1 ± 14.8 | 10.01 | 370.0 ± 10.5 |
Observed HU for the 5-mL Eppendorf tubes with a concentration ranging from approximately 0 to 10 mg/mL 166Ho-microspheres (18.7, 17.6%) and Ho chloride (43.47%) in styrofoam (as seen in Fig. 1) measured on a Siemens Symbia T16
Fig. 1Phantom. a The phantom setup of ten 5-mL Eppendorf tubes in styrofoam. b Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of the phantom showing the increasing concentrations of Ho in mg/mL. c Regression slopes of HU values obtained by the calculated concentration of Ho in mg/mL
Ex vivo Ho recovery by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT)
| Injected Ho | SPECT recovery | CT recovery | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBq | mg | MBq | % | mg | % | |
| Tissue 1 | 81.1 | 18.0 | 75.9 | 93.6 | 16.1 | 89.8 |
| Tissue 2 | 73.6 | 16.3 | 67.6 | 91.9 | 13.2 | 81.0 |
| Tissue 3 | 40.3 | 8.9 | 36.5 | 90.6 | 7.3 | 81.7 |
| Tissue 4 | 24.4 | 5.4 | 23.1 | 94.7 | 4.4 | 81.5 |
| Tissue 5 | 15.4 | 3.4 | 15.6 | 101.3 | 2.5 | 73.8 |
Two 5-mL Eppendorf tubes filled with activity were used for SPECT calibration. Five samples of chicken muscle tissue were injected with radioactive microspheres ranging from 15.4 to 81.1 MBq with the corresponding amount of mg Ho. Based on the dose calibrator measurements, SPECT, and CT imaging recovered 90.6–101.3% and 73.8–89.9%, respectively
In vivo Ho recovery in subcutaneous VX-2 tumour-bearing rabbits by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT)
| Rabbit | Injected Ho | Tumour volume | Volume of voxels with HU > 100 | CT recovery | SPECT recovery | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBq | mg | cm3 | cm3 | % | mg | % | MBq | % | |
| 1 | 0.10 | 3.6 | 6.6 | 0.5 | 6.9 | 2.8 | 77.7 | NP | |
| 2 | 0.07 | 2.2 | 6.0 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 59.9* | NP | |
| 3 | 0.04 | 1.4 | 7.2 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 76.9 | NP | |
| 4 | 0.01 | 0.4 | 3.2 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 0.4 | 100.0 | NP | |
| 5 | 57.9 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 9.1 | 1.9 | 65.4* | 54.3 | 93.8% |
Five rabbits with subcutaneous VX-2 tumours were injected with decayed or radioactive microspheres with the corresponding amounts of Ho. The tumour volume ranged from 3.2 to 7.2 cm3, based on the HU < 100 threshold while 0.1–0.5 cm3 or 2.5–9.1% of the tumour volume was filled with holmium after treatment. Ho recovery by CT ranged from 59.9 to 100.0% (n = 5), recovery by SPECT was 93.8% (n = 1)
NP Not performed
*Evident collections of air on CT resulting in decreased recovery of holmium due to partial volume effects and voxels with large negative HU
Fig. 2Ho quantification in a subcutaneous VX-2 bearing rabbit. Rabbit 2. a Tumour before injection. The tumour is segmented with a yellow dotted line. The white arrow shows a rib. The rib is also visible in b. b Tumour after injection with accumulations of Ho microspheres, visible as white dots, indicated with white arrows. c A different axial slice shows the effect of inadvertent injection of air (black void inside the tumour). d Histogram of HU values of the entire tumour before and after injection of 166Ho microspheres. The large negative (left of peak) and positive tail (right of peak) are caused by a relatively small number of voxels with injected air or Ho, respectively
Ho recovery in patients single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT)
| Patient | Tumour volume | Injected Ho | SPECT recovery | CT recovery | Volume of voxels with HU > 100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cm3 | MBq | mg | MBq | % | mg | % | cm3 | % | |
| 1 | 44.6 | 366.7 | 36.5 | 309.2 | 84.3 | 32.4 | 88.8 | 2.7 | 6.1 |
| 2 left | 5.6 | 53.9 | 13.7 | 9.6 | 17.8 | 2.3 | 16.5 | 0.5 | 8.0 |
| 2 right | 6.1 | 63.8 | 16.2 | 16.9 | 26.5 | 3.8 | 23.5 | 0.6 | 9.3 |
| 3 | 3.9 | 17.6 | 3.1 | 8.5 | 48.3 | 1.5 | 48.6 | 0.9 | 23.1 |
Three patients with recurrent head and neck cancer were treated with radioactive 166Ho-microspheres and underwent SPECT/CT imaging. Patient 2 was treated on both sides of the neck. Base on the injected activity, the corresponding amount of mg Ho was calculated. Injected activity compared to SPECT recovery was 17.8–84.3%. CT recovery was in line with SPECT imaging ranging from 16.5 to 88.8%. Tumour volume was 3.9–44.6 cm3 based on the > 100 HU threshold; from 6.1 to 23.1% of tumour volume was filled with 166Ho-microspheres
Fig. 3Computed tomography (CT) images of patient number 1. Axial, sagittal, and three-dimensional CT reconstructions of patient number 1 with a large necrotic tumour on the left neck side. During injection, the holmium microspheres were clearly visible on ultrasound as a cloud in the necrotic fluid and did precipitate after some minutes at the bottom of the tumour. The dorsal and caudal accumulation of 166Ho microspheres in the tumour is also well visible in the three images obtained in supine position (arrows in a, b, and c)
Fig. 4Multimodality imaging and histopathology after injection of 166Ho microspheres in patient number 3. a Unenhanced computed tomography (CT); microspheres are visible as hyperdense area on the left side of the tongue (arrow). b Single-photon computed tomography/CT; the location of the microspheres dose distribution is observed as a large hotspot. c Magnetic resonance imaging; with dose reconstruction derived and overlaid on this image, obtained with a T2* multi-gradient echo weighted sequence acquiring 16 echoes (TR/TE1/ΔTE: 1000 ms/1.33 ms/1.15 ms; flip angle 70°), the black centre has 166Ho microsphere concentration > 10 mg/ml, resulting in a rapid signal loss restricting the nonlinear least squares (exponential) fit to compute a T2* value and thus a dose value. d Histopathology. The haematoxylin and eosin staining shows a moderately differentiated and partly invasive growing oral squamous cell carcinoma with clusters of 166Ho microspheres. The black arrow indicates purple spherical structures that are sliced microspheres. The white arrow indicates white spherical structures that are partly or totally removed microspheres by slicing the tissue in 4-μm slices. In the direct environment of the microspheres, a necrotic tissue is seen, while the periphery is unaffected by radiation. Infiltration of lymphocytes is most likely radiation unrelated and often seen in oral squamous cell carcinoma [18]