Literature DB >> 17504158

Factors affecting the sensitivity and detection limits of MRI, CT, and SPECT for multimodal diagnostic and therapeutic agents.

Peter R Seevinck1, Jan-Henry Seppenwoolde, Tim C de Wit, Johannes F W Nijsen, Freek J Beekman, Alfred D van Het Schip, Chris J G Bakker.   

Abstract

Noninvasive imaging techniques like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) play an increasingly important role in the diagnostic workup and treatment of cancerous disease. In this context, a distinct trend can be observed towards the development of contrast agents and radiopharmaceuticals that open up perspectives on a multimodality imaging approach, involving all three aforementioned techniques. To promote insight into the potentialities of such an approach, we prepared an overview of the strengths and limitations of the various imaging techniques, in particular with regard to their capability to quantify the spatial distribution of a multimodal diagnostic agent. To accomplish this task, we used a two-step approach. In the first step, we examined the situation for a particular therapeutic anti-cancer agent with multimodal imaging opportunities, viz. holmium-loaded microspheres (HoMS). Physical phantom experiments were performed to enable a comparative evaluation of the three modalities assuming the use of standard equipment, standard clinical scan protocols, and signal-known-exactly conditions. These phantom data were then analyzed so as to obtain first order estimates of the sensitivity and detection limits of MRI, CT and SPECT for HoMS. In the second step, the results for HoMS were taken as a starting point for a discussion of the factors affecting the sensitivity and detection limits of MRI, CT and SPECT for multimodal agents in general. In this, emphasis was put on the factors that must be taken into account when extrapolating the findings for HoMS to other diagnostic tasks, other contrast agents, other experimental conditions, and other scan protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17504158     DOI: 10.2174/187152007780618153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem        ISSN: 1871-5206            Impact factor:   2.505


  17 in total

1.  Protein Nanospheres: Synergistic Nanoplatform-Based Probes for Multimodality Imaging.

Authors:  Michael A McDonald; Paul C Wang; Eliot L Siegel
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2011-01-24

Review 2.  In vivo imaging of molecular targets and their function in endocrinology.

Authors:  Joanna E Burdette
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.098

3.  Development and application of a multimodal contrast agent for SPECT/CT hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Jason M Criscione; Lawrence W Dobrucki; Zhen W Zhuang; Xenophon Papademetris; Michael Simons; Albert J Sinusas; Tarek M Fahmy
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 4.  Polymeric micelles in anticancer therapy: targeting, imaging and triggered release.

Authors:  Chris Oerlemans; Wouter Bult; Mariska Bos; Gert Storm; J Frank W Nijsen; Wim E Hennink
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Microspheres with ultrahigh holmium content for radioablation of malignancies.

Authors:  W Bult; P R Seevinck; G C Krijger; T Visser; L M J Kroon-Batenburg; C J G Bakker; W E Hennink; A D van het Schip; J F W Nijsen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Cellular magnetic resonance imaging: in vivo imaging of melanoma cells in lymph nodes of mice.

Authors:  Paula J Foster; Elizabeth A Dunn; Kristina E Karl; Jonatan A Snir; Colleen M Nycz; Alfred J Harvey; Ron J Pettis
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  MRI-based biodistribution assessment of holmium-166 poly(L-lactic acid) microspheres after radioembolisation.

Authors:  Gerrit H van de Maat; Peter R Seevinck; Mattijs Elschot; Maarten L J Smits; Hendrik de Leeuw; Alfred D van Het Schip; Maarten A D Vente; Bernard A Zonnenberg; Hugo W A M de Jong; Marnix G E H Lam; Max A Viergever; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Johannes F W Nijsen; Chris J G Bakker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Holmium nanoparticles: preparation and in vitro characterization of a new device for radioablation of solid malignancies.

Authors:  Wouter Bult; Rosanne Varkevisser; Fouad Soulimani; Peter R Seevinck; Hendrik de Leeuw; Chris J G Bakker; Peter R Luijten; Alfred D van Het Schip; Wim E Hennink; J Frank W Nijsen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Holmium-166 poly(L-lactic acid) microsphere radioembolisation of the liver: technical aspects studied in a large animal model.

Authors:  M A D Vente; T C de Wit; M A A J van den Bosch; W Bult; P R Seevinck; B A Zonnenberg; H W A M de Jong; G C Krijger; C J G Bakker; A D van het Schip; J F W Nijsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Intratumoral administration of holmium-166 acetylacetonate microspheres: antitumor efficacy and feasibility of multimodality imaging in renal cancer.

Authors:  Wouter Bult; Stephanie G C Kroeze; Mattijs Elschot; Peter R Seevinck; Freek J Beekman; Hugo W A M de Jong; Donald R A Uges; Jos G W Kosterink; Peter R Luijten; Wim E Hennink; Alfred D van het Schip; J L H Ruud Bosch; J Frank W Nijsen; Judith J M Jans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.