Literature DB >> 32388877

Diagnostic accuracy of first-trimester combined screening for early-onset and preterm pre-eclampsia at 8-10 compared with 11-13 weeks' gestation.

M Mendoza1, P Garcia-Manau1, S Arévalo1, M Avilés1, B Serrano1, M Á Sánchez-Durán1, I Garcia-Ruiz1, E Bonacina1, E Carreras1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the ability of first-trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia (PE) to predict early-onset and preterm PE when pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and placental growth factor (PlGF) were assessed before vs after 11 weeks' gestation.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies undergoing routine first-trimester screening conducted at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, between October 2015 and September 2017. Demographic characteristics, obstetric history, maternal history and biophysical markers (mean uterine artery pulsatility index and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP)) were recorded at the first-trimester scan (at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation). Maternal serum concentrations of PAPP-A and PlGF were assessed from the routine first-trimester blood test (at 8 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks). Women were classified into two groups depending on whether serum biomarkers were assessed at 8 + 0 to 10 + 6 weeks or at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks. Probability scores for early-onset and preterm PE were calculated by using two different algorithms: the multivariate Gaussian-distribution model and The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) competing-risks model. Receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curves were produced and detection rates at fixed 5% and 10% false-positive rates were computed to compare the performance of these algorithms when PAPP-A and PlGF were assessed before vs after 11 weeks.
RESULTS: Of the 2641 women included, serum biomarkers were assessed before 11 weeks in 1675 (63.4%) and at or after 11 weeks in 966 (36.6%). Of these, 90 (3.4%) women developed PE, including 11 (0.4%) cases of early-onset PE and 30 (1.1%) of preterm PE. Five (45.5%) cases of early-onset and 16 (53.3%) of preterm PE were identified in the group in which serum biomarkers were assessed at 8 + 0 to 10 + 6 weeks and six (54.5%) cases of early-onset and 14 (46.7%) of preterm PE in the group in which serum biomarkers were assessed at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks. In the prediction of early-onset and preterm PE using the Gaussian algorithm, no differences were observed between the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) when PAPP-A and PlGF were measured before or after 11 weeks. In the prediction of early-onset and preterm PE using the FMF algorithm, no differences were observed between AUCs for any of the combinations used for risk calculation when the serum biomarkers were obtained before vs after 11 weeks, except for the combination of PAPP-A and MAP, which showed a greater AUC for the prediction of early-onset PE when PAPP-A was measured at or after 11 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: The prediction of early-onset and preterm PE is similar when serum biomarkers are measured before or after 11 weeks. This allows the use of a two-step approach for PE risk assessment that permits immediate risk calculation at the time of the first-trimester scan.
© 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PlGF; early-onset pre-eclampsia; first-trimester; pre-eclampsia; screening; uterine artery Doppler

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32388877      PMCID: PMC7839448          DOI: 10.1002/uog.22071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  16 in total

1.  First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 combining biochemistry and ultrasound at individually optimal gestational ages. An interventional study.

Authors:  Antoni Borrell; Elena Casals; Albert Fortuny; M Teresa Farre; Anna Gonce; Aurora Sanchez; Anna Soler; Vicençc Cararach; Joan A Vanrell
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Importance of Timing First-Trimester Placental Growth Factor and Use of Serial First-Trimester Placental Growth Factor Measurements in Screening for Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Beatrice Mosimann; Sofia Amylidi-Mohr; Katrin Höland; Daniel Surbek; Lorenz Risch; Luigi Raio
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.587

Review 3.  Saving mothers' lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-8: a review.

Authors:  J H McClure; G M Cooper; T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Protocol for measurement of mean arterial pressure at 10-40weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Llinos Roberts; Piya Chaemsaithong; Daljit S Sahota; Kypros H Nicolaides; Liona C Y Poon
Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.899

5.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  First-trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 at 7-14 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  D Wright; K Spencer; K Kagan K; N Tørring; O B Petersen; A Christou; J Kallikas; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Competing risks model in early screening for preeclampsia by biophysical and biochemical markers.

Authors:  Ranjit Akolekar; Argyro Syngelaki; Leona Poon; David Wright; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.587

8.  Critical care in obstetrical patients: an eight-year review.

Authors:  L C Tang; A C Kwok; A Y Wong; Y Y Lee; K O Sun; A P So
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  A new model for screening for early-onset preeclampsia.

Authors:  Bernat Serra; Manel Mendoza; Elena Scazzocchio; Eva Meler; Martí Nolla; Enric Sabrià; Ignacio Rodríguez; Elena Carreras
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia.

Authors:  Lelia Duley
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.300

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of placental growth potential and placental bed perfusion by 3D ultrasound for early second-trimester prediction of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Hong Cui; Leilei Yu; Hua Li; Hongling Wang; Wenwen Liang; Huige Wang; Huifeng Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.357

2.  High Frequency of Fetal Loss in Fetuses With Normal Karyotype and Nuchal Translucency ≥ 3 Among the Iranian Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Shokoh Abotorabi; Niloufar Moeini; Sahar Moghbelinejad
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2020-06

3.  Shared risk factors for COVID-19 and preeclampsia in the first trimester: An observational study.

Authors:  Berta Serrano; Manel Mendoza; Paula Garcia-Aguilar; Erika Bonacina; Itziar Garcia-Ruiz; Pablo Garcia-Manau; Judit Gil; Mireia Armengol-Alsina; Nuria Fernandez-Hidalgo; Elena Sulleiro; Rosa Maria Lopez-Martinez; Marta Ricart; Lourdes Martin; Eva Lopez-Quesada; Angels Vives; Anna Maroto; Nerea Maiz; Anna Suy; Elena Carreras
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.544

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.