| Literature DB >> 32385412 |
Berkley Luck1,2,3, Melinda A Engevik4,5, Bhanu Priya Ganesh6, Elizabeth P Lackey2,7, Tao Lin1,2, Miriam Balderas2,8, Angela Major2, Jessica Runge2,9, Ruth Ann Luna2,9, Roy V Sillitoe1,2,7,9, James Versalovic1,2,8.
Abstract
We hypothesized that early-life gut microbiota support the functional organization of neural circuitry in the brain via regulation of synaptic gene expression and modulation of microglial functionality. Germ-free mice were colonized as neonates with either a simplified human infant microbiota consortium consisting of four Bifidobacterium species, or with a complex, conventional murine microbiota. We examined the cerebellum, cortex, and hippocampus of both groups of colonized mice in addition to germ-free control mice. At postnatal day 4 (P4), conventionalized mice and Bifidobacterium-colonized mice exhibited decreased expression of synapse-promoting genes and increased markers indicative of reactive microglia in the cerebellum, cortex and hippocampus relative to germ-free mice. By P20, both conventional and Bifidobacterium-treated mice exhibited normal synaptic density and neuronal activity as measured by density of VGLUT2+ puncta and Purkinje cell firing rate respectively, in contrast to the increased synaptic density and decreased firing rate observed in germ-free mice. The conclusions from this study further reveal how bifidobacteria participate in establishing functional neural circuits. Collectively, these data indicate that neonatal microbial colonization of the gut elicits concomitant effects on the host CNS, which promote the homeostatic developmental balance of neural connections during the postnatal time period.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32385412 PMCID: PMC7210968 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64173-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Neonatal conventionalized model replicates seeding conditions of intestinal microbiota by dam and environment (a) Timeline of controlled colonization of pups and dams in each gnotobiotic isolator occurred during the neonatal (P1-P21) developmental window. Pups received oral gavages of either the Bifidobacterium treatment (BIF) or sterile PBS (CONV and GF groups). The fecal slurries from SPF mice was delivered to the CONV dams on P1. See the Methods section for additional experimental detail. (GF = germ-free, CONV= Conventionalized, BIF=Bifidobacterium-colonized, P = postnatal day) (b-e) Data shown was generated from both male and females, n = 15-30 mice (>2 litters)/group/timepoint) (b) Alpha diversity of microbiota in each treatment group as measured by the Shannon Diversity Index (right panel) and Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) richness as measured by number of observed OTUs (left panel) (c-d) Longitudinal relative abundance of operational taxonomic units (OTUs). (c) Phylum–level comparison and (d) genus-level comparisons of OTU relative abundance in the CONV group of mice at each developmental timepoint. (e) Principal Coordinates Analysis demonstrating similarity between male and female fecal microbiome profiles in the conventionalized cohort. The percentage variation explained by each of the three primary principal factors is indicated on each axis. Coordinates representing individual samples are colored according to group, with distances to other coordinates indicating relative similarity/dissimilarity. (f) Representative micrographs (40x magnification) from Carnoy’s-fixed and paraffin-embedded cecal tissue from BIF mice at each postnatal timepoint. Slides were hybridized with the Texas Red-labeled Bifidobacterium genus-specific probe Bif164, demonstrating sparse colonization at early neonatal stages but increased colonization by P20. Nuclei of mouse intestinal epithelial cells are counterstained using DAPI.
Figure 2Summary analysis indicating significant downregulation of gene expression in colonized mice during early postnatal development. (a) Plot summarizes the results of the qPCR array. Values inside the circles represent the number of genes differentially expressed relative to germ-free control mice at each postnatal timepoint, in each brain region. The magnitude of the fold-change is indicated by position on the graph. CONV (open circle) and BIF (closed circle). (b) Comparison of downregulated genes in P4 mice (BIF relative to GF, CONV relative to GF, and genes downregulated in both BIF and CONV mice relative to GF). (c-e) Genes differentially expressed in BIF and CONV mice >1.5 fold in the P4 mice Cerebellum (c), Cortex (d), and Hippocampus (Figure 1.) (*No error bars or statistical significance bars are shown due to the pooled samples used for this analysis, PCR array of RNA from n = 5 male mice/group/timepoint/brain region).
Figure 3Colonization with conventional microbiota and bifidobacteria facilitates early microglial reactivity and mid-late microglial ramification (a) Representative image of gating strategy for flow cytometric analysis. (b) Results plotted as percentage of CD11b+ CD45low microglia/total microglia at each timepoint. Ramified microglia possess the phenotype CD11b+,CD45low. At P4, GF mice have an increased % of microglia expressing markers of ramified microglia, relative to BIF mice. (One-Way ANOVA; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, *** p<0.001; n = 3 male animals/group/timepoint) (c) Microglia were labeled using an anti-IBA1 (Ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1) antibody. Scale = 50 μm. Representative images of staining in cerebellar white matter of P4 pups in each group, demonstrating fewer ameboid microglia in P4 germ-free mice (d) Morphological classification and quantification of ramified vs. ameboid microglia in P4 mice (**** p<0.0001, n = 3 mice/group, with 3 fields per mouse). (e) Expression of Tnf gene from whole tissue homogenate in each region (Cb = Cerebellum, Cort = frontal cortex, Hipp = Hippocampus) (data generated from PCR array data, therefore statistical significance and error bars are not shown for these pooled samples; n = 5 male mice/group/timepoint/brain region) (f) qPCR analysis of GF and BIF mouse cerebellum for markers of phagocytic microglia. (One-Way ANOVA; *p<0.05; n = 8 male animals/group/timepoint) (g) qPCR analysis of GF and BIF mouse cerebellum for scavenger receptors, which are required for proper phagocytosis. (One-Way ANOVA; *p<0.05; n = 8 male animals/group/timepoint).
Figure 4Germ-free mice display aberrant synaptic density and synaptic function that is normalized by bifidobacteria colonization (a) Simplified diagram of the cerebellar circuit over postnatal development and corresponding phases of synaptic refinement. (b) Inset illustrates interaction between two cerebellar cell types: Purkinje cells (PC; main functional output of cerebellum) and climbing fibers (CF). CF synapses on PCs are initially supernumerary, but eventually reach a 1 CF: 1 PC ratio with 1 CF terminals synapsing on multiple locations of PC dendrites. The circuit diagram also shows simplified signaling input and output between the cell types in this model system. (c). Micrographs (40X magnification) of molecular layer of cerebellum in lobule II of brain slices from P20 male mice in each group stained with anti-VGLUT2 antibody. Puncta of the pre-synaptic marker VGLUT2 were counted in a 400 micron field. Inset demonstrates puncta analysis in ImageJ. The density of the pre-synaptic marker VGLUT2 per field is quantified in the right panel as VGLUT+ puncta per mm2 *p<0.05, **p<0.01, One-way ANOVA (3 fields per section with 3 sections per animal, n = 3 animals per group) (d) Schematic of in vivo electrophysiological recording of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum, and representative extracellular single-unit recording traces from male germ-free and bifidobacteria-colonized mice. Asterisk indicates low-frequency complex spikes that are triggered by climbing fiber input, which identifies the cell as a Purkinje cell. The instantaneous firing rate is indicated by the pink line above the raw traces. (Figure 1). Firing characteristics of Purkinje cells quantified from in vivo electrophysiological recordings of GF and BIF anesthetized P20 male mice (n = 3-5 animals/group with 3 separate recordings per animal).
Figure 5Proposed mechanism of bifidobacteria-mediated effects on host neurodevelopmental processes. In this proposed model, bifidobacteria down-regulate early expression of synapse-related genes in the host CNS. Additionally, bifidobacteria are important for the early reactive functionality of microglia, which prevent excess synapse formation during this critical window. This process promotes effective refinement of the developing synaptic network and potentiation of appropriate contacts, leading to circuit maturation. Functional organization of neural circuitry leads to synchronicity of firing and typical behavioral phenotypes.
Bifidobacterium species used to examine effects of neonatal colonization on mammalian neurodevelopment.
| Species/Strain designations | BSL | Relevant features | Growth Conditions | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -Isolate from human infant intestine -Genome assembled and annotated | Anaerobic, MRS plates and liquid medium, 37°C | ATCC | |
| 1 | -Isolate from human infant feces -Genome assembled and annotated | Anaerobic, MRS plates and liquid medium, 37°C | ATCC | |
| 1 | -Isolate from human infant feces -Genome assembled and annotated | Anaerobic, MRS plates and liquid medium, 37°C | ATCC | |
| 1 | -Isolate from human infant intestine -Genome assembled and annotated | Anaerobic, MRS plates and liquid medium, 37°C | ATCC |
BSL = Biosafety Level.
MRS = Man, Rogosa and Sharpe medium.
Anaerobic gas mix = 80% N2, 10% CO2, 10% H2.
ATCC = American Type Culture Collection.