Literature DB >> 34030655

The metabolic profile of Bifidobacterium dentium reflects its status as a human gut commensal.

Melinda A Engevik1,2,3, Heather A Danhof4, Anne Hall5,6, Kristen A Engevik4, Thomas D Horvath5,6, Sigmund J Haidacher5,6, Kathleen M Hoch5,6, Bradley T Endres7, Meghna Bajaj8, Kevin W Garey7, Robert A Britton4, Jennifer K Spinler5,6, Anthony M Haag5,6, James Versalovic5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bifidobacteria are commensal microbes of the mammalian gastrointestinal tract. In this study, we aimed to identify the intestinal colonization mechanisms and key metabolic pathways implemented by Bifidobacterium dentium.
RESULTS: B. dentium displayed acid resistance, with high viability over a pH range from 4 to 7; findings that correlated to the expression of Na+/H+ antiporters within the B. dentium genome. B. dentium was found to adhere to human MUC2+ mucus and harbor mucin-binding proteins. Using microbial phenotyping microarrays and fully-defined media, we demonstrated that in the absence of glucose, B. dentium could metabolize a variety of nutrient sources. Many of these nutrient sources were plant-based, suggesting that B. dentium can consume dietary substances. In contrast to other bifidobacteria, B. dentium was largely unable to grow on compounds found in human mucus; a finding that was supported by its glycosyl hydrolase (GH) profile. Of the proteins identified in B. dentium by proteomic analysis, a large cohort of proteins were associated with diverse metabolic pathways, indicating metabolic plasticity which supports colonization of the dynamic gastrointestinal environment.
CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, we conclude that B. dentium is well adapted for commensalism in the gastrointestinal tract.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid stress; Bifidobacteria; Carbohydrates; Commensal; Glycans; Intestine; Metabolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34030655      PMCID: PMC8145834          DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02166-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Microbiol        ISSN: 1471-2180            Impact factor:   3.605


Introduction

Bifidobacteria are important members of the Actinobacteria phylum within the human intestinal microbiota [1-10]. The establishment of bifidobacteria in the intestine is connected with beneficial health effects, including immune development, neuromodulation, inhibition of pathogens, and modulation of the intestinal microbiota composition [11-23]. To produce these beneficial effects, bifidobacteria must be able to survive gastrointestinal (GI) transit and persist in the dynamic environment of the intestine. Thus, analysis of the mechanisms of intestinal survival and colonization are pivotal to understand the functional activities of bifidobacteria. Nutrient availability and utilization shapes the composition and gene expression of the intestinal microbiota [11, 24–30]. Broad genomic approaches have predicted that bifidobacteria can use a wide variety of nutrient sources to colonize the human GI tract [5, 25, 31–35]. More direct studies that have examined growth parameters of bifidobacteria have largely focused on carbohydrate metabolism [36]. As a result, information about the physiology and metabolic profiles of any one Bifidobacterium species is fragmented. Identifying the strategies used by specific bifidobacteria to harvest dietary nutrients is important for defining the metabolic properties that underpin ecological fitness in and adaptation to the human intestinal environment. Moreover, this information could be employed to increase the presence of select bifidobacteria in the intestine and harness their associated health benefits. The aim of this study was to identify key pathways in ecological niche development of Bifidobacterium dentium. B. dentium is a member of the oral and intestinal microbiome. It is frequently isolated from healthy infant stool [3, 6–8] and has an approximate relative abundance of 0.7% in healthy human adults according to the Human Microbiome Project consortium [37-41]. We have previously demonstrated that B. dentium colonizes gnotobiotic mice, promotes goblet cell maturation, secretion of the mucin protein MUC2, stimulates intestinal serotonin production, generates the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), alleviates visceral hypersensitivity and regulates the gut-brain-axis [21–23, 38, 42]. The importance of these functions in GI health motivated us to characterize the metabolic profile of B. dentium to identify environmental queues that can influence intestinal colonization. We sought to characterize the metabolic capacity of B. dentium using microbial phenotype microarray technology, genome analysis and proteomics. This work is among the first to delineate the metabolic profile of B. dentium ATCC 27678. Our data suggest that B. dentium adheres to the intestinal mucus layer, exhibits acid resistance, and utilizes a wide range of physiologically abundant dietary nutrient sources commonly found in the intestine. These data suggest that B. dentium is well-adapted for life in the gastrointestinal tract.

Methods

Bacterial culture conditions

Bifidobacterium dentium ATCC 27678 (ATCC, American Type Culture Collection) was grown in de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) medium (Difco) in an anaerobic workstation (Anaerobe Systems AS-580) at 37 °C overnight in a mixture of 5% CO2, 5% H2, and 90% N2. Bacterial growth was measured by optical density (OD600nm) using a spectrophotometer. For intestinal adhesion assays, B. dentium was grown overnight in MRS anaerobically at 37 °C and bacterial cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 5000 x g for 5 min. Cell pellets were washed three times with sterile anaerobic PBS to remove residual MRS and the bacterial pellet was resuspended in anaerobic PBS containing 10 μM carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFDA-SE; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA; #V12883) and incubated for 1 h anaerobically at 37 °C. Following incubation, bacterial cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 5000 x g for 5 min, and were washed 3-5x with sterile anaerobic PBS. B. dentium fluorescence was confirmed by microscopy and were used for adhesion with the HT29-MTX mammalian cell cultures. For an acid stress test, B. dentium was grown in MRS anaerobically at 37 °C for 8 h to exponential phase and bacterial cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 5000 x g for 5 min. B. dentium was resuspended at an OD600nm = 2.0 in MRS at a pH of 7.6, 7.0, 6.0, 5.0, 4.0, and 3.0 to simulate the different regions of the GI tract. B. dentium was incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 2 h in the various pH conditions. Following incubation, B. dentium cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 5000 x g for 5 min, washed 2x to remove residual MRS and then resuspended in anaerobic PBS. Cells were stained with the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability Stains (Thermo Fisher Scientific cat# L7012) according to the manufacturer’s details. Briefly, B. dentium was mixed with a 2x LIVE/DEAD BacLight staining reagent mixture and incubated for 15 min in the dark at 37 °C anaerobically. Then a 100 μL volume of each of the B. dentium cell suspensions were added to a black-walled 96-well flat-bottom microplate. Fluorescence was recorded using the following excitation (ex) and emission (em) wavelengths: ex: 485 nm/em: 530 nm (green) and ex: 485 nm/em: 630 nm (red) on a Synergy H1 Microplate Reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc.). Viabilities were calculated with the following equation: (ex: 485/em: 530 values)/(ex:458/em: 630 values) × 100% (Ratio green/red × 100%).

Intracellular pH assay

B. dentium was grown in MRS for 24 h from a starter culture inoculated at OD600nm = 0.1. From this starter culture, a 100 μL volume of bacterial suspension was transferred to a conical bottomed 96-well plate and pelleted by centrifugation at 2000 x g for 5 min. Cell pellets were washed twice in live cell imaging solution (LCIS, Molecular Probes) and then resuspended in LCIS containing 1x pHrodo Red AM dye (provided as 1000x in dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO) and 1x PowerLoad (provided as 100x) (Molecular Probes). B. dentium was incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 30 min. Following incubation, bacterial cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 2000 x g for 5 min to remove excess staining solution and then were resuspended in a 100 μL volume of LCIS. Using a vacuum manifold with ~ 5 in Hg vacuum pressure, B. dentium cells were immobilized on a 0.22 μm-pore polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) filter plate (Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA). Filters were washed once by vacuum and wells were refilled with LCIS. The filter plate was then loaded into a Synergy HT plate reader with incubation at 37 °C. A citrate buffer series was used to examine intracellular pH due to the wide pH range and its successful application with other lactic acid bacteria [43]. Fluorescence (ex: 560 nm/em: 590 nm) was recorded every 5 min over a 50 min timeframe, first in a common buffer (pH 7.6, min 0–10), then in the test buffers at pH 3–8 (min 10–50). Higher relative fluorescence unit (RFU) values indicate more acidic conditions. Standard curves were generated from fluorescence readings taken over 10 min in potassium citrate buffers at pH 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 in the presence of 10 μM valinomycin and 10 μM nigericin to equilibrate intra- and extracellular pH. Intracellular pH was calculated at the final test buffer time point (t = 50 min) from linear regression lines.

Biolog phenotypic microarray

For Biolog assays, B. dentium was grown overnight (~ 16 h) in MRS as described above. Cells were then diluted 1:20 in a fully-defined medium, termed LDM4 (Lactic Acid Bacteria Defined Media 4) [44], lacking glucose. Each well of Biolog NPGM2 and PM1 microarrays (Biolog, Inc., Haywood, CA, USA) was seeded with a 100 μL volume of cell suspension. Growth was monitored by Optical density (OD600nm) readings at 10 min intervals for 16 h. Growth was assessed compared to a negative control well lacking any carbon substrate and a value of OD600nm ≥ 0.2 was considered positive (n = 2 independent biological replicates per plate).

Bacterial genome analysis

The genome of B. dentium ATCC 27678 (GCF_000172135.1) was downloaded from NCBI and functionally assessed using the web-based tools NCBI Conserved Domain Database, Carbohydrate Active Enzymes (CAZy; www.cazy.org), and KEGG [45-48].

Mammalian culture conditions

HT29-MTX cells were obtained from Millipore-Sigma (#12040401). Cells were maintained in Gibco Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells were tested for Mycoplasma using the Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza, cat# LT07–518). For adhesion assays, HT29-MTX cells were seeded at 2 × 105 cells on poly-L-lysine coated round coverslips and incubated for 3–5 days until confluent. When monolayers were confluent, HT29-MTX cells were incubated with Hoechst 33342 staining dye solution (Invitrogen) in PBS for 10 min at 37 °C, washed, and treated with 1 × 107 cells of CFDA-tagged B. dentium for 1 h aerobically at 37 °C. After the incubation, non-adhered cells were removed with 3x washes of PBS and cells were fixed with Clarke’s Fixative to maintain the mucus architecture. A subset of cells were used for Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) imaging using a FEI XL-30FEG microscope. Cells that were reserved for immunostaining were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X for 30 min at room temperature, blocked with PBS containing 10% donkey serum, and incubated with an anti-human MUC2 antibody (Santa Cruz, cat # sc-515,032; 1:200 dilution) overnight at 4 °C. Following PBS washes, cells were incubated with donkey-anti-mouse AlexaFluor 555 (Life Technologies, cat # A11004; 1:1000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature. Coverslips were mounted to slides using FluoroMount (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and slides were imaged on the Nikon Eclipse TiE inverted microscope.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Following imaging, the wells of the slides were washed gently with PBS containing Mg2+ and Ca2+ (2x) and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 1 h at room temperature as previously described [42]. The black compartment of the CELLview slide was detached, the slide was dehydrated with ethanol, and coated in 20 nm of gold using a desktop sputtering system (Denton Desk II). All slides were viewed in a FEI XL-30FEG SEM microscope operated with an electron beam acceleration voltage of 12 kV [42].

Proteomic analysis

Chemical and reagents

Optima LC/MS-grade acetonitrile (ACN), formic acid (FA), and water, and Promega™ porcine trypsin protease were all purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Ammonium bicarbonate (BioUltra-grade) was purchased from Millipore-Sigma.

Proteomics sample preparation

Bacterial sample pellets were suspended in a 200-μL volume of water and samples were sonicated in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. Afterwards, the samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 rpm. The resulting sample supernatants containing bacterial protein were removed from the pellet of cellular debris, and the samples were dried in a SpeedVac overnight to yield pelleted protein in the sample tubes. A 100-μL volume of a 10 μg/mL solution of porcine trypsin prepared in a 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate solution was added to the pelleted protein contained in each sample tube, and the samples were vortex-mixed for 1 min and incubated at 37 °C for 8 h.

Chromatography

Tryptic digest samples were chromatographically separated on a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLC nano-system (Thermo Scientific) using an Acclaim PepmapTM C-18 capillary column (75 μm (ID) × 150 mm (L), Thermo Scientific) outfitted with an Acclaim PepmapTM C18 trap column (100 μm (ID) × 20 mm (L), Thermo Scientific). Chromatography was performed as previously described [22]. Elution gradients were prepared from an aqueous mobile phase (A) of H2O:ACN:FA (94.9:5:0.1 v/v/v) and an organic mobile phase (B) of ACN:FA (99.9:0.1 v/v). Sample elution onto the trap column was carried out using a trap column buffer of H2O:ACN:FA (94.9:5:0.1 v/v/v). Samples (5 μL) were injected onto the trap column with a flow rate of 5 μL/min. After 5 min, the loading valve was switched to allow the sample to elute off the trap column at a flow rate of 300 nL/min and onto the capillary column for separation. The elution gradient used was specified as follows: Started at 1% B, ramped up linearly to 45% B over 37 min; ramped up linearly to 80% B over 1 min; held at 80% B for 1 min; ramped back to 1% B over 1 min and held for 16 min to re-equilibrate.

Mass spectrometric conditions

Samples were analyzed using an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) using a nanoionization source operated in positive ion mode with the following source conditions: ionspray voltage, static at 1.6 kV; ion transfer tube temperature, 275 °C. Global MS acquisition parameters were specified as follows: precursor ion scan range, mass-to-charge (m/z) 200 - m/z 1000; S-lens RF level, 60%; data type, profile; MIPS, true; charge states, 2–4; data dependent mode, top speed; precursor priority, most intense; exclude after n times, 1: exclusion duration, 60s; mass tolerance, parts-per-million (ppm); low/high, 10; exclude isotopes, true; MSn level, 2; isolation mode, quadrupole; isolation window, m/z 1.6; CID activation, true; CID collision energy, 35%; detector type, Orbitrap; scan-range mode, auto; orbitrap resolution, 120,000; automatic gain control (AGC) target, 5.0e4; maximum injection time, 60 ms; microscans, 1; and, tandem MS data format, profile. Data were acquired with the Thermo Scientific Xcalibur software package (v4.1.50).

Mass spectrometric data analysis

Data were analyzed using Proteome Discoverer (Thermo Scientific). Data were searched against the Uniprot Bifidobacterium database (8 Aug 2020) which also included a common contaminant database. The following parameters were used for protein identification: minimum precursor mass, 350 Dalton (Da); maximum precursor mass, 5000 Da; minimum peak count, 1; minimum peptide length, 6; precursor mass tolerance, 10 ppm; fragment mass tolerance, 0.02 Da; dynamic modifications included oxidation for methionine and acetylation for protein N-terminus; target and decoy database, concatenated; validation based on q-Value; and, FDR targets were 0.01 for strict and 0.05 for relaxed.

Statistics and graphs

Graphs and heat maps were created using GraphPad Prism software (version 8) (GraphPad Inc.). Comparisons were made with either One-way ANOVA or Repeated Measures ANOVA with the Holm-Sidak post-hoc test. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, with P < 0.05 (*) considered statistically significant. See Tables 3 and 4 and Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Table 2 for statistical analysis.
Table 3

Statistics from growth curves at time point, 8.3 h. Significant p values are denoted as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001

8.3 hrs
Comparison95.00% CI of diff.Significant?P Value
Negative vs. D-Galactose-0.7584 to -0.09959**0.0022
Negative vs. D-Mannose-0.8634 to -0.2046****<0.0001
Negative vs. alpha-D-Glucose-0.8554 to -0.1966****<0.0001
Negative vs. Sedoheptulosan-0.7294 to -0.07059**0.0061
Negative vs. D-Xylose-0.6594 to -0.0005865*0.0492
Negative vs. D-Mannitol-0.7794 to -0.1206**0.0011
Negative vs. D-Melibiose-0.7194 to -0.06059**0.0084
Negative vs. Gentiobiose-0.7994 to -0.1406***0.0005
Negative vs. Maltose-0.9494 to -0.2906****<0.0001
Negative vs. Sucrose-1.049 to -0.3906****<0.0001
Negative vs. Turanose-0.8294 to -0.1706***0.0002
Negative vs. D-Raffinose-0.8694 to -0.2106****<0.0001
Negative vs. Maltotriose-0.9094 to -0.2506****<0.0001
Negative vs. Stachyose-0.8794 to -0.2206****<0.0001
Negative vs. D-Gluconic Acid-0.5014 to -0.03863**0.0097
Negative vs. L-Proline-0.7237 to -0.03635*0.0206
Negative vs. Sec-Butylamine0.004907 to 0.03509*0.013
Negative vs. Amygdalin-0.4010 to -0.09401****<0.0001
Negative vs. Arbutin-0.3325 to -0.02551*0.0107
Negative vs. Salicin-0.3335 to -0.02651*0.01
16 hrs
Comparison95.00% CI of diff.Significant?P Value
Negative vs. D-Mannose-0.8481 to -0.2299****<0.0001
Negative vs. alpha-D-Glucose-0.9221 to -0.3039****<0.0001
Negative vs. Sedoheptulosan-0.6891 to -0.07092**0.0052
Negative vs. D-Mannitol-0.6491 to -0.03092*0.0198
Negative vs. Gentiobiose-0.8191 to -0.2009****<0.0001
Negative vs. Maltose-0.7591 to -0.1409***0.0004
Negative vs. Sucrose-0.8091 to -0.1909****<0.0001
Negative vs. Turanose-0.8791 to -0.2609****<0.0001
Negative vs. D-Raffinose-0.7291 to -0.1109**0.0012
Negative vs. Maltotriose-0.8391 to -0.2209****<0.0001
Negative vs. Stachyose-0.7891 to -0.1709***0.0001
Negative vs. D-Gluconic Acid-0.3574 to -0.08257****<0.0001
Negative vs. Amygdalin-0.6605 to -0.4385****<0.0001
Negative vs. Inosine-0.2255 to -0.003522*0.038
Negative vs. Arbutin-0.4595 to -0.2375****<0.0001
Negative vs. Salicin-0.4375 to -0.2155****<0.0001
Table 4

Statistics from growth curves at time point, 16.0 h. Significant p values are denoted as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001

Comparison95.00% CI of diff.Significant?P Value
Negative vs. D-Mannose− 0.8481 to − 0.2299****< 0.0001
Negative vs. alpha-D-Glucose− 0.9221 to − 0.3039****< 0.0001
Negative vs. Sedoheptulosan− 0.6891 to − 0.07092**0.0052
Negative vs. D-Mannitol− 0.6491 to − 0.03092*0.0198
Negative vs. Gentiobiose−0.8191 to − 0.2009****< 0.0001
Negative vs. Maltose−0.7591 to − 0.1409***0.0004
Negative vs. Sucrose−0.8091 to − 0.1909****< 0.0001
Negative vs. Turanose−0.8791 to − 0.2609****< 0.0001
Negative vs. D-Raffinose−0.7291 to − 0.1109**0.0012
Negative vs. Maltotriose−0.8391 to − 0.2209****< 0.0001
Negative vs. Stachyose−0.7891 to − 0.1709***0.0001
Negative vs. D-Gluconic Acid−0.3574 to − 0.08257****< 0.0001
Negative vs. Amygdalin−0.6605 to − 0.4385****< 0.0001
Negative vs. Inosine−0.2255 to − 0.003522*0.038
Negative vs. beta-Methyl-DXyloside−0.06148 to 0.1605ns0.9514
Negative vs. Arbutin−0.4595 to − 0.2375****< 0.0001
Negative vs. Salicin−0.4375 to − 0.2155****< 0.0001

Results

B. dentium is acid resistant and can adhere to intestinal mucus suggesting its efficacy to persist in the gastrointestinal tract

To colonize the gastrointestinal tract microbes must overcome the acidic pH found in the stomach and upper GI to gain access to the lower parts of the intestine. In general, bifidobacteria are considered to have a weak acid tolerance with the exception of B. animalis [49] and B. longum [50-52]. Using the NCBI Conserved Domain Database to assess the functional annotation of the B. dentium ATCC 27678 (GCF_000172135.1) proteins, we noted the presence of three Na+/H+ antiporter proteins that may contribute to acid tolerance in B. dentium [45-48] (Table 1). To address the ability of B. dentium to survive transit through the low pH environment of the stomach and small intestine experimentally, we incubated overnight cultures of B. dentium in MRS with pH of 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 for 2 h. After incubation, cell viability was obtained by live/dead cell staining using a BACLight kit as examined by microscopy (Fig. 1a) and fluorescence plate reader quantification (Fig. 1b). B. dentium exhibited high viability over a pH range from 4 to 7, as denoted by green staining, and > 90% viability levels. Even in highly acidic conditions (pH 3), B. dentium still maintained 41.8% ± 2.4 viability, indicating acid tolerance. Intracellular pH analysis by pHrodo Red AM dye demonstrated that surviving B. dentium were able to regulate their intracellular pH over time (Fig. 1c, d). These data suggest that B. dentium is acid-tolerant, similar to findings with gastrointestinal colonizers B. animalis and B. longum [53], and thus likely able to survive the transit through the upper GI system.
Table 1

Notable ion antiporters identified from the genome of Bifidobacterium dentium ATCC 27678

Accession No.DescriptionProposed Function
WP_003840740.1Na+/H+ antiporterAcid tolerance
WP_003837813.1cation:proton antiporterAcid tolerance
WP_003838459.1Na+/H+ antiporterAcid tolerance
Fig. 1

Bifidobacterium dentium is resistant to acid stress. a Representative images of live/dead staining of B. dentium ATCC 27678 after 2 h incubation in media at pH 7, 6, 5, 4, and 3. Inserts at high magnification highlight the abundance of live (green) and dead (red) B. dentium at pH 7 and pH 3 (scale bar = 50 μm). b Quantitation of live/dead cell staining on a fluorescent plate reader. c Intracellular pH analysis of B. dentium with pHrodo Red pH sensitive dye. Variance in intracellular pH is reflected by the change in relative fluorescence units (RFU), at various extracellular pH values over 50 min. d Calculated final intracellular pH values at t = 50 min. All data are presented as mean ± stdev

Notable ion antiporters identified from the genome of Bifidobacterium dentium ATCC 27678 Bifidobacterium dentium is resistant to acid stress. a Representative images of live/dead staining of B. dentium ATCC 27678 after 2 h incubation in media at pH 7, 6, 5, 4, and 3. Inserts at high magnification highlight the abundance of live (green) and dead (red) B. dentium at pH 7 and pH 3 (scale bar = 50 μm). b Quantitation of live/dead cell staining on a fluorescent plate reader. c Intracellular pH analysis of B. dentium with pHrodo Red pH sensitive dye. Variance in intracellular pH is reflected by the change in relative fluorescence units (RFU), at various extracellular pH values over 50 min. d Calculated final intracellular pH values at t = 50 min. All data are presented as mean ± stdev The ability to adhere to the intestinal mucus layer is an important aspect of bifidobacterial colonization [54]. Mucus adhesion is proposed to enhance epithelial integrity and pathogen exclusion [55], as well as provide closer access for metabolite delivery and immune stimulation [56, 57]. Investigation of the functional annotation of B. dentium ATCC 27678 indicated the presence of glycosyltransferase enzymes that promote bacterial capsular formation along with pilin and fimbrial proteins (Table 2). These proteins have been previously associated with mucus adherence and GI colonization and may also facilitate mucus adhesion for B. dentium. To assess adhesion of B. dentium to intestinal mucus, we added fluorescently-tagged B. dentium to human mucin-producing HT29-MTX monolayers for 1 h and examined adhesion by immunostaining (Fig. 2). Similar to other well characterized Bifidobacterium strains, we observed robust adhesion of B. dentium to MUC2 mucin by immunostaining (Fig. 2a) and SEM imaging (Fig. 2b). The ability of B. dentium to withstand acidic conditions and adhere to intestinal mucus highlights its potential to inhabit the intestine.
Table 2

Notable glycosyltransferases and proteins involved in adhesion identified from the genome of Bifidobacterium dentium ATCC 27678

Accession No.DescriptionProposed Function
WP_003837192.1Glycosyltransferase family 2Bacterial capsule biosynthesis
WP_003837196.1Glycosyltransferase family 2Bacterial capsule biosynthesis
WP_003836797.1Glycosyltransferase family 2Bacterial capsule biosynthesis
WP_003836799.1Glycosyltransferase family 1Exopolysaccharide biosynthesis
WP_003837542.1Glycosyltransferase family Amannose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferase
WP_003837819.1Glycosyltransferase family 2Bacterial capsule biosynthesis
WP_003838069.1Glycosyltransferase family BGT transferase
WP_034257238.1Glycosyltransferase family 4 proteinCell wall biosynthesis
WP_033488900.1GlycosyltransferaseAnthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase
WP_034257219.1Nucleotidyltransferases2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase
WP_003837207.1Isopeptide-forming fimbrial proteinPilus formation
Fig. 2

B. dentium adheres to mucus-producing human intestinal epithelial cells. a Representative immunofluorescence images of B. dentium ATCC 27678 (yellow) co-localization with MUC2 (blue) in mucin-producing human HT29-MTX colonic cells after 1 h incubation (scale bar = 50 μm). b Scanning electron micrograph of B. dentium and HT29-MX cells after 1 h incubation (scale bar = 5 μm)

Notable glycosyltransferases and proteins involved in adhesion identified from the genome of Bifidobacterium dentium ATCC 27678 B. dentium adheres to mucus-producing human intestinal epithelial cells. a Representative immunofluorescence images of B. dentium ATCC 27678 (yellow) co-localization with MUC2 (blue) in mucin-producing human HT29-MTX colonic cells after 1 h incubation (scale bar = 50 μm). b Scanning electron micrograph of B. dentium and HT29-MX cells after 1 h incubation (scale bar = 5 μm)

B. dentium metabolism of dietary sugars and select host derived carbon sources promote growth

Previous work examining microbe metabolism have relied on adding nutritional components to rich media, such as MRS. However, the complexity of this medium, poses challenges to identification of the dietary requirements of these microbes. To circumvent this challenge we used LDM4 media, a fully-defined medium which can be prepared to exact nutrient composition [44]. Using LDM4 prepared without glucose, we examined the ability of B. dentium to grow on a number of nutrients as individual primary carbon sources by Biolog phenotype analysis (Fig. 3, Tables 3 and 4). Growth of B. dentium was examined in the presence of 50 different sugars, including hexoses (Fig. 3a), pentoses (b), ketoses (c), disaccharides (d), trisaccharides (e), sugar alcohols (f), deoxy sugars (g) and amino sugars (h). As shown in the graphs and heat map (Fig. 3i), B. dentium exhibits robust growth with a variety of carbohydrates, with substantial growth found on galactose, mannose, maltose, xylose, sucrose, truanose, D-raffinose, maltotriose, stachyose, D-melibiose, gentiobiose, sedoheptulosan and D-mannitol. These findings are consistent with the B. dentium Bd1 genome analysis [33], which indicated that B. dentium encoded a wide variety of enzymes for the fermentation of pentose sugars. The utilization of sucrose by B. dentium ATCC 27678 was reflected by our proteomic analysis, in which we identified 24 proteins involved in sucrose metabolism (Table 5). We also identified proteins involved in maltose-binding (MalE), maltose transport systems (MalG), xylose isomerases, xylose ABC transporters, raffinose-binding, mannose metabolism, and ABC sugar transports (Table 5); findings which reflect our growth profiles. No appreciable growth was observed on many sugars, including D- or L-arabitol, lactitol, maltitol, D-lactose, D-cellboiose, D-trehalose, lactulose, fucose, among others. The inability of B. dentium ATCC 27678 to use fucose is consistent a previous study that demonstrate that B. dentium DSM 20436 and VBif10D2 are unable to use fucose in mYCFA medium [58]. In this capacity, B. dentium resembles most Bifidobacterium species which are largely unable to use fucose [58].
Fig. 3

B. dentium grows on select sugars in the absence of glucose. B. dentium ATCC 27678 was grown anaerobically at 37 °C in Biolog plates with a fully-defined media (LDM4) preparation that lacked glucose. Growth was monitored over 16 h by plate reader in plate containing a hexoses, b pentoses, c ketoses, d disaccharides, e trisaccharides, f sugar alcohols, g deoxy sugars and h amino sugars. i For visualization, heat maps were generated for all sugars at time 0, 8.3 and 16.0 h. All data are presented as mean ± stdev

Table 5

Proteins identified in B. dentium ATCC 27678 by proteomic analysis

Pathway DescriptionPathway Accession# Proteins
2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolismbde0121012
2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolismbks012109
2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolismblf012105
2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolismblx012101
2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolismbln012101
ABC transportersbde0201026
ABC transportersbks020106
ABC transportersblf020104
Acarbose and validamycin biosynthesisbks005251
Acarbose and validamycin biosynthesisbde005251
Acarbose and validamycin biosynthesisboa005251
Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolismbde002509
Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolismbks002504
Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolismblf002504
Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolismbln002503
Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolismbde0052013
Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolismbks005209
Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolismblf005207
Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolismbln005202
Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolismboa005202
Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesisbde0097019
Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesisbks0097011
Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesisblf009705
Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesisbln009704
Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesisboa009702
Arginine biosynthesisbde002208
Arginine biosynthesisbks002207
Arginine biosynthesisblf002206
Arginine biosynthesisbln002203
Bacterial secretion systembde030706
Bacterial secretion systembks030703
Bacterial secretion systemblf030702
Bacterial secretion systembln030701
beta-Alanine metabolismbde004101
beta-Lactam resistancebde015013
beta-Lactam resistanceblf015011
Biosynthesis of amino acidsbde0123038
Biosynthesis of amino acidsbks0123023
Biosynthesis of amino acidsblf0123018
Biosynthesis of amino acidsbln012307
Biosynthesis of amino acidsboa012304
Biosynthesis of amino acidsblx012301
Biosynthesis of antibioticsbde0113051
Biosynthesis of antibioticsbks0113031
Biosynthesis of antibioticsblf0113019
Biosynthesis of antibioticsbln011309
Biosynthesis of antibioticsboa011307
Biosynthesis of antibioticsblx011302
Biosynthesis of antibioticsblm011301
Biosynthesis of secondary metabolitesbde0111062
Biosynthesis of secondary metabolitesbks0111037
Biosynthesis of secondary metabolitesblf0111024
Biosynthesis of secondary metabolitesbln0111010
Biosynthesis of secondary metabolitesboa011108
Biosynthesis of secondary metabolitesblx011102
Biosynthesis of secondary metabolitesblm011101
Butanoate metabolismbde006504
Butanoate metabolismbks006502
Butanoate metabolismblf006501
Butanoate metabolismboa006501
C5-Branched dibasic acid metabolismbde006604
C5-Branched dibasic acid metabolismbks006603
Carbon metabolismbde0120025
Carbon metabolismbks0120015
Carbon metabolismblf0120010
Carbon metabolismboa012005
Carbon metabolismbln012003
Chloroalkane and chloroalkene degradationbks006251
Chloroalkane and chloroalkene degradationbde006251
Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)bde000205
Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)bks000202
Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)boa000202
Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)blf000201
Cyanoamino acid metabolismbde004601
Cyanoamino acid metabolismboa004601
Cysteine and methionine metabolismbde002708
Cysteine and methionine metabolismbks002706
Cysteine and methionine metabolismblf002703
Cysteine and methionine metabolismboa002702
Cysteine and methionine metabolismblm002701
Degradation of aromatic compoundsbks012201
Degradation of aromatic compoundsbde012201
DNA replicationbde030302
DNA replicationbks030301
Fatty acid biosynthesisboa000612
Fatty acid biosynthesisbks000611
Fatty acid biosynthesisblf000611
Fatty acid biosynthesisbde000611
Fatty acid degradationbks000711
Fatty acid degradationbde000711
Fatty acid metabolismboa012122
Fatty acid metabolismbks012121
Fatty acid metabolismblf012121
Fatty acid metabolismbde012121
Fructose and mannose metabolismbde000512
Fructose and mannose metabolismbks000511
Fructose and mannose metabolismboa000511
Galactose metabolismbde000526
Galactose metabolismbks000524
Galactose metabolismblf000523
Galactose metabolismboa000521
Glutathione metabolismbde004803
Glutathione metabolismbks004802
Glutathione metabolismblf004801
Glycerolipid metabolismbks005611
Glycerolipid metabolismblf005611
Glycerolipid metabolismbde005611
Glycerophospholipid metabolismbde005644
Glycerophospholipid metabolismbks005643
Glycerophospholipid metabolismblf005642
Glycerophospholipid metabolismbln005641
Glycine, serine and threonine metabolismbde002609
Glycine, serine and threonine metabolismbks002603
Glycine, serine and threonine metabolismbln002601
Glycine, serine and threonine metabolismblf002601
Glycine, serine and threonine metabolismboa002601
Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesisbde0001011
Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesisbks0001010
Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesisblf000105
Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesisbln000103
Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesisboa000103
Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesisblm000101
Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolismbde006306
Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolismbks006302
Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolismblf006302
Histidine metabolismblf003401
Histidine metabolismbde003401
Homologous recombinationbde034402
Homologous recombinationbks034401
Inositol phosphate metabolismboa005622
Inositol phosphate metabolismbks005621
Inositol phosphate metabolismbde005621
Lipopolysaccharide biosynthesisboa005401
Lysine biosynthesisbde003004
Lysine biosynthesisbks003003
Metabolic pathwaysbde01100118
Metabolic pathwaysbks0110071
Metabolic pathwaysblf0110048
Metabolic pathwaysboa0110019
Metabolic pathwaysbln0110017
Metabolic pathwaysblx011007
Metabolic pathwaysblm011001
Methane metabolismbde006807
Methane metabolismbks006804
Methane metabolismbln006802
Methane metabolismblf006802
Methane metabolismboa006801
Microbial metabolism in diverse environmentsbde0112036
Microbial metabolism in diverse environmentsbks0112024
Microbial metabolism in diverse environmentsblf0112013
Microbial metabolism in diverse environmentsboa011206
Microbial metabolism in diverse environmentsbln011203
Microbial metabolism in diverse environmentsblm011201
Mismatch repairbde034303
Mismatch repairbks034302
Monobactam biosynthesisbks002612
Monobactam biosynthesisbde002612
Naphthalene degradationbks006261
Naphthalene degradationbde006261
Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolismblf007602
Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolismbks007602
Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolismbde007602
Nitrogen metabolismbde009103
Nitrogen metabolismbks009102
Nitrogen metabolismblf009102
One carbon pool by folateblf006702
One carbon pool by folatebde006702
One carbon pool by folatebks006701
Other glycan degradationbde005111
Oxidative phosphorylationbde001909
Oxidative phosphorylationbks001906
Oxidative phosphorylationblx001905
Oxidative phosphorylationblf001904
Oxidative phosphorylationbln001903
Oxidative phosphorylationboa001902
Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesisbde007706
Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesisbks007704
Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesisblf007703
Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesisblx007701
Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesisbln007701
Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesisboa007701
Pentose and glucuronate interconversionsbde000404
Pentose and glucuronate interconversionsblf000401
Pentose and glucuronate interconversionsbks000401
Pentose phosphate pathwaybde0003010
Pentose phosphate pathwaybks000306
Pentose phosphate pathwayblf000305
Peptidoglycan biosynthesisbde005504
Peptidoglycan biosynthesisbks005501
Peptidoglycan biosynthesisblf005501
Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesisbde004002
Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesisblf004001
Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesisbks004001
Phosphotransferase system (PTS)bks020601
Phosphotransferase system (PTS)bde020601
Polyketide sugar unit biosynthesisbks005231
Polyketide sugar unit biosynthesisbde005231
Polyketide sugar unit biosynthesisboa005231
Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolismbde008601
Propanoate metabolismbde006407
Propanoate metabolismbks006405
Propanoate metabolismblf006403
Propanoate metabolismblm006401
Protein exportbde030607
Protein exportbks030603
Protein exportblf030602
Protein exportbln030601
Purine metabolismbde0023019
Purine metabolismbks0023010
Purine metabolismblf002306
Purine metabolismbln002304
Purine metabolismblx002302
Purine metabolismboa002302
Pyrimidine metabolismbde0024011
Pyrimidine metabolismbks002407
Pyrimidine metabolismblf002405
Pyrimidine metabolismbln002403
Pyrimidine metabolismboa002402
Pyrimidine metabolismblx002401
Pyruvate metabolismbde0062010
Pyruvate metabolismbks006205
Pyruvate metabolismboa006203
Pyruvate metabolismblf006202
Pyruvate metabolismblm006201
Quorum sensingbde0202417
Quorum sensingbks020245
Quorum sensingblf020244
Quorum sensingbln020241
Riboflavin metabolismboa007401
Ribosomebde0301047
Ribosomebks0301017
Ribosomebln0301015
Ribosomeblf0301014
Ribosomeboa0301010
Ribosomeblx030105
RNA degradationbde030186
RNA degradationbln030184
RNA degradationbks030184
RNA degradationblf030183
RNA degradationboa030182
RNA degradationbad030181
RNA polymerasebde030204
RNA polymerasebks030203
RNA polymeraseblf030202
RNA polymeraseblx030201
RNA polymerasebln030201
Secondary bile acid biosynthesisbks001211
Secondary bile acid biosynthesisbde001211
Selenocompound metabolismbde004502
Selenocompound metabolismbks004501
Selenocompound metabolismblf004501
Sphingolipid metabolismbde006001
Starch and sucrose metabolismbde0050011
Starch and sucrose metabolismbks005006
Starch and sucrose metabolismblf005004
Starch and sucrose metabolismboa005002
Starch and sucrose metabolismbln005001
Streptomycin biosynthesisbks005213
Streptomycin biosynthesisbde005213
Streptomycin biosynthesisboa005212
Streptomycin biosynthesisblf005211
Taurine and hypotaurine metabolismbde004303
Taurine and hypotaurine metabolismbks004302
Taurine and hypotaurine metabolismblf004301
Thiamine metabolismbde007301
Two-component systembde020204
Two-component systemblf020202
Two-component systembks020201
Tyrosine metabolismbks003501
Tyrosine metabolismbde003501
Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesisbde002907
Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesisbks002904
Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesisblf002903
Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesisblx002901
Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesisbln002901
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradationbde002802
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradationbks002801
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradationblf002801
Vancomycin resistancebde015021
Vitamin B6 metabolismbde007501
B. dentium grows on select sugars in the absence of glucose. B. dentium ATCC 27678 was grown anaerobically at 37 °C in Biolog plates with a fully-defined media (LDM4) preparation that lacked glucose. Growth was monitored over 16 h by plate reader in plate containing a hexoses, b pentoses, c ketoses, d disaccharides, e trisaccharides, f sugar alcohols, g deoxy sugars and h amino sugars. i For visualization, heat maps were generated for all sugars at time 0, 8.3 and 16.0 h. All data are presented as mean ± stdev Statistics from growth curves at time point, 8.3 h. Significant p values are denoted as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 Statistics from growth curves at time point, 16.0 h. Significant p values are denoted as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 Proteins identified in B. dentium ATCC 27678 by proteomic analysis The B. dentium ATCC 27678 genome contains 88 glycosyl hydrolase (GH) genes from 25 different GH families (Fig. 4). The majority of the B. dentium ATCC 27678 GH genes are found in families GH3 (14%), GH13 (14%), and GH43 (16%). The GH13 family encodes enzymes which degrade α-glucoside linkages, such as α-amylases [59, 60], while the GH43 family contains xylanase (which break down plant-derived hemicellulose into xylose and arabinose) as well as arabinases (which degrade complex polysaccharides or arabino-oligosaccharides and liberate L-arabinose). The GH3 family notably contains β-glucosidases, β-xylosidases, N-acetylhexosaminidase, and other enzymes. The presence of these GHs suggests a high propensity to degrade dietary plant polysaccharides.
Fig. 4

The B. dentium ATCC 27678 genome contains mulitple glycosyl hydrolase (GH) genes. The B. dentium ATCC 27678 genome was found to harbor 88 GH-related genes, encoding for 25 different GH families

The B. dentium ATCC 27678 genome contains mulitple glycosyl hydrolase (GH) genes. The B. dentium ATCC 27678 genome was found to harbor 88 GH-related genes, encoding for 25 different GH families Interestingly, we observed few GHs associated with human milk oligosaccharide (HMOs) or mucin degradation. B. dentium did possess genes in GH2 (6.8%; galactosidase); GH 29 (1.1%; fucosidase), and GH125 (1.1%; mannosidase). Surprisingly, B. dentium lacked GH33, GH101, GH129, GH84, GH85, GH89, GH95, GH20, and GH38; which are involved in HMO and mucin degradation and common in some Bifidobacterium species [42]. Consistent with these findings, the experimental carbohydrate utilization profile (Fig. 3) indicates poor or absent growth on components of host-derived glycans as a sole carbon source, including lactose, N-acetylgalactosamine, N-acetylglucosamine or N-acetylneuraminic acid that would most likely require GH genes from families GH33, GH95, and GH101 (Fig. 3a, d, g, h and i). Consistent with the presence of GH43 and GH125, host-associated galactose and mannose supported growth of B. dentium (Fig. 3a), indicating select host factors influence B. dentium colonization and growth. As expected, B. dentium growth (i.e., a final OD600nm of > 0.2) was also observed on certain plant-derived carbohydrates such as maltose, melibiose, sucrose, ribose, fructose, and turanose (Fig. 3i). These data suggest that in the absence of glucose, B. dentium is able to support its growth via 14 different sugars, most of which are plant-derived and may have variable availability depending on the host diet.

B. dentium has limited ability to use amino acids, nucleosides and polymers as a sole carbon source

The ability to metabolize peptides and amino acids is a common feature among gut microbiota [61]. However, amino acids and nucleotides are often studied as nitrogen sources rather than a primary carbon source. Currently, little information is available on the ability of bifidobacteria to use these substrates as both primary carbon and nitrogen sources in the absence of additional carbohydrates. We examined the growth of B. dentium during a time course on a panel of 32 amino acids and amino acid derivatives in LDM4 lacking glucose (Fig. 5, Tables 3 and 5). Surprisingly, B. dentium could use 14 amino acids as sole carbon sources to support limited growth over short time periods ≤8.3 h (OD600nm > 0.2, representing growth) (Fig. 5a, b). These amino acids included D-aspartic acid, D-serine, D-threonine, L-alanine, L-asparagine, L-aspartic acid, L-glutamic acid, L-glutamine, L-serine, L-threonine, tyramine, Glycyl-L-aspartic acid, Glycyl-L-glutamic acid, and Glycyl-L-Proline. Next, we examined B. dentium on glycosides and specifically nucleosides (Fig. 6a-d). B. dentium had significant growth using amygdalin, arbutin and salicin (Fig. 6a, c), consistent with findings in pigs that these glycosides promote the growth of certain Bifidobacterium strains [62]. In contrast, no growth was observed with nucleosides (Fig. 6b, d), cyclodextrin polymers (Fig. 6e, h), or polysorbates (Fig. 6g, h). Interestingly, we observed no significant growth with several polysaccharides (Fig. 6f, h), including inulin, which has been shown in mouse studies and human clinical trials to lead to an increase in bifidobacteria [13, 63–68]. To simulate the diverse number of carbon sources in the GI tract, we supplemented inulin containing LDM4 with glucose and we observed that the combination of carbon sources supported more growth than glucose alone (at 2.5 h: LDM4 glucose control OD600nm = 0.39 ± 0.11, Inulin = 0.54 ± 0.12; mean ± stdev). Finally, we analyzed the ability of B. dentium to grow with 59 different organic acid sources. Of the organic acids examined, B. dentium growth was only stimulated to statistical significance by D-glucuronic acid (Fig. 7a-f). These data point to the metabolic flexibility of B. dentium to use select amino acids, glycosidases and organic acids to support microbial growth in the absence of a carbohydrate source.
Fig. 5

B. dentium yields minimal growth on amino acids and amino acid derivatives in LDM4 preparations prepared without glucose. B. dentium ATCC 27678 was grown anaerobically at 37 °C in Biolog plates with a fully-defined media (LDM4) preparation that lacked glucose. Growth was monitored over 16 h by plate reader in plate containing (a) 33 different amino acids. b For visualization, heat maps were generated for all amino acids at time 0, 8.3 and 16.0 h. All data are presented as mean ± stdev

Fig. 6

B. dentium does not grow on glycosides, nucleosides, polymers, polysaccharides or polysorbates in the absence of glucose, with the exception of amygdalin, arbutin and salicin. B. dentium ATCC 27678 was grown anaerobically at 37 °C in Biolog plates with a fully-defined media (LDM4) preparation that lacked glucose. Growth was monitored over 16 h by plate reader in plate containing a glycosides, b nucleosides. Heat maps were generated for c glycosides and d nucleosides at time 0, 8.3 and 16 h. B. dentium growth was also monitored with e polymers, f polysaccharides, and g polysorbates. h For visualization, heat maps were generated for polymers, polysaccharides and polysorbates at time 0, 8.3 and 16.0 h. All data are presented as mean ± stdev

Fig. 7

B. dentium has minimal growth on organic acids without glucose. B. dentium ATCC 27678 was grown anaerobically at 37 °C in Biolog plates with a fully-defined media (LDM4) preparation that lacked glucose. Growth was monitored over 16 h by plate reader in plate containing 59 different organic acids. Acids were separated into groups: a 12 acids, b 9, c 9, d 8 and e 21 acids. f Heat maps were generated for organic acids at time 0, 8.3 and 16.0 h. All data are presented as mean ± stdev

B. dentium yields minimal growth on amino acids and amino acid derivatives in LDM4 preparations prepared without glucose. B. dentium ATCC 27678 was grown anaerobically at 37 °C in Biolog plates with a fully-defined media (LDM4) preparation that lacked glucose. Growth was monitored over 16 h by plate reader in plate containing (a) 33 different amino acids. b For visualization, heat maps were generated for all amino acids at time 0, 8.3 and 16.0 h. All data are presented as mean ± stdev B. dentium does not grow on glycosides, nucleosides, polymers, polysaccharides or polysorbates in the absence of glucose, with the exception of amygdalin, arbutin and salicin. B. dentium ATCC 27678 was grown anaerobically at 37 °C in Biolog plates with a fully-defined media (LDM4) preparation that lacked glucose. Growth was monitored over 16 h by plate reader in plate containing a glycosides, b nucleosides. Heat maps were generated for c glycosides and d nucleosides at time 0, 8.3 and 16 h. B. dentium growth was also monitored with e polymers, f polysaccharides, and g polysorbates. h For visualization, heat maps were generated for polymers, polysaccharides and polysorbates at time 0, 8.3 and 16.0 h. All data are presented as mean ± stdev B. dentium has minimal growth on organic acids without glucose. B. dentium ATCC 27678 was grown anaerobically at 37 °C in Biolog plates with a fully-defined media (LDM4) preparation that lacked glucose. Growth was monitored over 16 h by plate reader in plate containing 59 different organic acids. Acids were separated into groups: a 12 acids, b 9, c 9, d 8 and e 21 acids. f Heat maps were generated for organic acids at time 0, 8.3 and 16.0 h. All data are presented as mean ± stdev These findings of metabolic functionality are supported by our proteomic analysis of B. dentium ATCC 27678 from LDM4 cultures using glucose as a primary carbon source (Fig. 8, Table 5). Of the 319 proteins we identified, 52 (16.3%) were involved in metabolic pathways and 15 (4.7%) were involved in metabolism in diverse environments. We observed several proteins involved in carbon metabolism (3.4%), purine metabolism (2.5%), amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism (1.6%), glycine/serine/threonine metabolism (1.6%), cysteine/methionine metabolism (1.6%), pyruvate metabolism (1.3%), starch and sucrose metabolism (1.3%) and alanine/aspartate/glutamate metabolism (0.9%). Consistent with our genome analysis, we observed proteins involved in the pentose phosphate pathway (1.3%) and large number of ABC transporters (4.3%). Together these findings indicate that B. dentium can metabolize a wide range of growth substrates, including nutrient sources that are commonly found in the human diet and in the gut lumen.
Fig. 8

Pathway analysis B. dentium by proteomic analysis. B. dentium ATCC 27678 were examined using high-resolution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry based proteomics and 319 proteins were identified from B. dentium. The functional classifications of these proteins are illustrated in the pie chart above

Pathway analysis B. dentium by proteomic analysis. B. dentium ATCC 27678 were examined using high-resolution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry based proteomics and 319 proteins were identified from B. dentium. The functional classifications of these proteins are illustrated in the pie chart above

Discussion

The human GI tract is a highly competitive environment characterized by fluctuations in nutrient source availability. As a result, metabolic versatility, which allows microbes to use multiple carbon, nitrogen, and other sources, is characteristic of successful commensal microbes. In this study, we provide an in-depth analysis of B. dentium growth in a myriad of conditions, including varying acid conditions and nutrient sources (Fig. 9). We demonstrate that B. dentium can survive conditions which mirror the transit through the GI tract and adheres to intestinal mucus, indicating adaptation as a commensal member of the GI tract. The data gathered in this study also provide a substantial amount of information on the growth-promoting properties of B. dentium. We demonstrate that in the absence of glucose, B. dentium can still use 14 sugars, 4 amino acids/amino acid derivatives/amines, 3 glycosides, and 1 organic acid to support its growth. These data reveal metabolic flexibility in nutrient utilization in B. dentium, which likely is key to successful competition in the dynamic intestinal milieu. Despite some carbon sources supporting only modest/or short-term growth, according to Rolf Freter’s nutrient niche hypothesis, we interpret this finding as being both a necessary and a sufficient component of B. dentium ecological fitness in the GI tract. It is highly unlikely that long term carbon utilization will depend on any single source in vivo, but short-term utilization of variable and transient nutrients is critical to successful colonization [69-71]. The data presented demonstrate B. dentium’s ability to grow and thrive under varying conditions found in the gastrointestinal tract. These findings enlighten our understanding of the diverse sources that regulate B. dentium’s ability to colonize the human intestine.
Fig. 9

Proposed model for B. dentium intestinal colonization. Our data suggest that B. dentium is acid resistant, adheres to the intestinal mucus layer and consumes a variety of dietary sources. We speculate that these features contribute to the ability of B. dentium to colonize the intestine

Proposed model for B. dentium intestinal colonization. Our data suggest that B. dentium is acid resistant, adheres to the intestinal mucus layer and consumes a variety of dietary sources. We speculate that these features contribute to the ability of B. dentium to colonize the intestine Like other bifidobacteria, B. dentium is a recognized member of the infant and adult intestinal microbiome [3, 6–8, 37]. However, B. dentium species are also members of the oral microbiome and have been identified in dental caries [33, 50, 72–81]. In addition to B. dentium, B. breve, B. adolescentis, and B. longum have also been isolated from dental caries [33, 50, 72–81]. Although the precise role bifidobacteria plays in dental caries is unknown, Bifidobacterium species may be bystanders due to their adhesive properties and their resistance to acidity [50, 82–84]. In gnotobiotic animals, B. dentium was found to have beneficial effects on the host, with no adverse effects noted [21–23, 42]; suggesting that B. dentium also participates as a commensal intestinal microbe. Dealing with acid stress is an important factor for colonizing gut microbes. Acid tolerance in bifidobacteria has been linked to the activity of the membrane H + -F1F0-ATPase [53, 85]. The H + -F1F0-ATPase enzyme is responsible for maintaining pH homeostasis in most anaerobic microbes. Acid-resistant Bifidobacterium species like B. animalis activate the F1F0-ATPase complex upon acid exposure [86, 87]. B. dentium encodes the genes for the H + -F1F0-ATPase (KEGG) and based on the relative resistance of B. dentium to low pH, we speculate that the H + F1F0-ATPase is likely activated. In B. longum, low extracellular pH is reflected by a low intracellular pH [85]. Similar to the literature, our data indicate that B. dentium’s intracellular pH can reach a low level without a significant loss in viability. Although these experiments were performed in rich bacterial media, we speculate that B. dentium would survive the transit of the gastrointestinal tract. Together, these findings suggest that B. dentium harbors compensatory mechanisms to withstand the various pHs of the gastrointestinal tract. Nutrient availability may be limited in the intestinal lumen due to a variety of factors including competition by other microbes, absorption by the host, or transit through the GI system. Therefore, metabolic plasticity is key to successful microbial colonization. Recent analysis of multiple oral and intestinal derived B. dentium genomes identified 140 conserved genes among B. dentium strains, indicating a high degree of phylogenetic relatedness [88]. All B. dentium genomes shared 19 glycosyl hydrolases families, with the highest abundance observed in GH13. This is consistent with our B. dentium ATCC 27678 analysis, which revealed the highest expression of GH13. The glycobiome of B. dentium strains also indicated a degradation of a wide range of carbohydrates and plant-derived polysaccharides [88]. Using Biolog phenotyping arrays, we identified that in the absence of glucose, B. dentium ATCC 27678 readily uses mannose, xylose, mannitol, maltose, sucrose, melibiose, gentiobiose, trunose, raffinose, maltotriose, and stachyose, Sedoheptulosan. We also observed growth with galactose, which supports previous work indicating that galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) supplementation bolsters the abundance of bifidobacteria [1, 2, 89]. This is also consistent with the B. dentium ATCC 27678 genome, which contains the GH enzyme for β-galactosidases (GH2 and GH42 families), likely allowing B. dentium to grow on galacto-oligosaccharides. Interestingly, we found that in the absence of glucose, B. dentium was unable to use several polysaccharides which normally promote bifidobacterial growth. These included well characterized inulin, lactulose, and pectin. Prebiotic substrates, in particular inulin and lactulose, have been used in human trials where they have been observed to increase Bifidobacterium spp. and provide beneficial effects to the host [13, 36, 90–93]. The addition of glucose back into the LDM4 preparation in our studies showed that B. dentium ATCC 27678 growth was enhanced with inulin, confirming the dependence on glucose for inulin metabolism [63]. We also observed that in the absence of glucose, B. dentium was able to use amino acids to support baseline growth. Limited data are available on nitrogen assimilation in the gut lumen, particularly by Bifidobacterium species [94]. Herein, we provide evidence for metabolism of select amino acids in lieu of a carbohydrate-based carbon source which can be used as carbon or nitrogen substrates as needed. We also found that B. dentium was largely unable to use host glycan sugars. This finding is consistent with the GH profile of B. dentium and our previous work which found that B. dentium could not degrade intact MUC2 mucus [42]. Other bifidobacteria, such as B. bifidum (PRL2010, D119 and L22), B. breve NCIMB8807, and B. longum NCIMB8809, harbor a much larger repertoire of mucin-degrading glycosyl hydrolases [95-99]. These mucin- and HMO-degrading GHs likely provide these Bifidobacterium strains with a competitive edge, allowing these microbes to be found at greater abundance than B. dentium in vivo. Consistent with GHs profile, we found that B. dentium exhibited substantial growth on β-glucans. B. dentium harbors GH 1, 3 and 30 which harbor β-glucosidases which can degrade plant based β-glucans and natural phenols, such as salicin, arbutin and amygdalin. Additionally, B. dentium had robust growth on these β-glucans, indicating that B. dentium may target plant-based nutrients. Our in vitro findings indicate that B. dentium supports it growth with several plant-derived compounds which closely mirrors dietary studies in humans. For example, consumption of pea and whey protein extract increases bifidobacteria levels in healthy subjects [100-102]. Consumption of date fruits, containing high levels of glucose, fructose, and sucrose, has also been reported to increase the relative abundance of bifidobacteria [103-105]. Diets rich in non-digestible carbohydrates, such as whole grain and wheat bran, are also linked to increases in bifidobacteria [106, 107]. In contrast, a Western diet (high in animal protein and fat, low in fiber) has been associated with decreased bifidobacteria [108-110]. These human studies support the important role of dietary compounds in modulating the microbial community and influencing the levels of bifidobacteria. Bifidobacteria have been associated with numerous health benefits, including immune-modulation, gut-brain-axis cross-talk, increasing intestinal mucus, enhancing epithelial integrity, pathogen exclusion, cancer prevention, and management of inflammatory bowel disease [16, 21, 23, 38, 42, 93, 111–143]. Thus, maintenance of bifidobacteria is likely important for maintaining intestinal homeostasis. Based on our newly identified nutrient sources for B. dentium, we propose that these compounds could be implemented in the future to promote B. dentium abundance in the human gastrointestinal tract. Collectively this work provides novel insights into the proteome and metabolic profile of B. dentium and our findings point to B. dentium as a well-adapted member of the gastrointestinal tract. Additional file 1.
  140 in total

1.  Bifidobacterium bifidum improves intestinal integrity in a rat model of necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  Ludmila Khailova; Katerina Dvorak; Kelly M Arganbright; Melissa D Halpern; Toshi Kinouchi; Masako Yajima; Bohuslav Dvorak
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 2.  [Probiotics in chronic inflammatory bowel disease].

Authors:  S Böhm; W Kruis
Journal:  MMW Fortschr Med       Date:  2006-08-31

3.  Galacto-oligosaccharides have prebiotic activity in a dynamic in vitro colon model using a (13)C-labeling technique.

Authors:  Annet J H Maathuis; Ellen G van den Heuvel; Margriet H C Schoterman; Koen Venema
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum reflects its adaptation to the human gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Mark A Schell; Maria Karmirantzou; Berend Snel; David Vilanova; Bernard Berger; Gabriella Pessi; Marie-Camille Zwahlen; Frank Desiere; Peer Bork; Michele Delley; R David Pridmore; Fabrizio Arigoni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The regulatory effects of whey retentate from bifidobacteria fermented milk on the microbiota of the Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME).

Authors:  A T Meddah; A Yazourh; I Desmet; B Risbourg; W Verstraete; M B Romond
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 6.  Genomic insights into bifidobacteria.

Authors:  Ju-Hoon Lee; Daniel J O'Sullivan
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Reduction of vitamin K concentration by salivary Bifidobacterium strains and their possible nutritional competition with Porphyromonas gingivalis.

Authors:  K Hojo; S Nagaoka; S Murata; N Taketomo; T Ohshima; N Maeda
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Effectiveness of Bifidobacterium bifidum in experimentally induced MRV infection: dietary implications in formulas for newborns.

Authors:  L C Duffy; M A Zielezny; M Riepenhoff-Talty; D Dryja; S Sayahtaheri-Altaie; E Griffiths; D Ruffin; H Barrett; J Rossman; P L Ogra
Journal:  Endocr Regul       Date:  1993-12

9.  Microbial Metabolic Capacity for Intestinal Folate Production and Modulation of Host Folate Receptors.

Authors:  Melinda A Engevik; Christina N Morra; Daniel Röth; Kristen Engevik; Jennifer K Spinler; Sridevi Devaraj; Sue E Crawford; Mary K Estes; Markus Kalkum; James Versalovic
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Bifidobacteria shape host neural circuits during postnatal development by promoting synapse formation and microglial function.

Authors:  Berkley Luck; Melinda A Engevik; Bhanu Priya Ganesh; Elizabeth P Lackey; Tao Lin; Miriam Balderas; Angela Major; Jessica Runge; Ruth Ann Luna; Roy V Sillitoe; James Versalovic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  Increase in Bifidobacterium is a characteristic of the difference in the salivary microbiota of pregnant and non-pregnant women.

Authors:  Satsuki Kato; Toshiyuki Nagasawa; Osamu Uehara; Shintaro Shimizu; Nodoka Sugiyama; Kozue Hasegawa-Nakamura; Kazuyuki Noguchi; Masayuki Hatae; Hiroshige Kakinoki; Yasushi Furuichi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Development of gut microbiota during the first 2 years of life.

Authors:  Mona-Lisa Wernroth; Sari Peura; Anna M Hedman; Susanne Hetty; Silvia Vicenzi; Beatrice Kennedy; Katja Fall; Bodil Svennblad; Ellika Andolf; Göran Pershagen; Jenny Theorell-Haglöw; Diem Nguyen; Sergi Sayols-Baixeras; Koen F Dekkers; Stefan Bertilsson; Catarina Almqvist; Johan Dicksved; Tove Fall
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Mathematical models to study the biology of pathogens and the infectious diseases they cause.

Authors:  Joao B Xavier; Jonathan M Monk; Saugat Poudel; Charles J Norsigian; Anand V Sastry; Chen Liao; Jose Bento; Marc A Suchard; Mario L Arrieta-Ortiz; Eliza J R Peterson; Nitin S Baliga; Thomas Stoeger; Felicia Ruffin; Reese A K Richardson; Catherine A Gao; Thomas D Horvath; Anthony M Haag; Qinglong Wu; Tor Savidge; Michael R Yeaman
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-03-15

4.  Unraveling the Metabolic Requirements of the Gut Commensal Bacteroides ovatus.

Authors:  Robert Fultz; Taylor Ticer; Faith D Ihekweazu; Thomas D Horvath; Sigmund J Haidacher; Kathleen M Hoch; Meghna Bajaj; Jennifer K Spinler; Anthony M Haag; Shelly A Buffington; Melinda A Engevik
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.