| Literature DB >> 32385242 |
Lei Tong1, Xinyu Huang1, Peng Wang2, Lei Ye3, Meng Peng1,2, Licong An4, Qiaodong Sun1, Yong Zhang1, Guoming Yang1, Zheng Li1, Fang Zhong2, Fang Wang2, Yixiu Wang4, Maithilee Motlag4, Wenzhuo Wu5, Gary J Cheng6, Weida Hu7,8.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32385242 PMCID: PMC7210936 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16125-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Anisotropic characterization of Te nanoflake.
a Schematic of the crystal structure of Te with a helical chain formed by three adjacent tellurium atoms. b Schematic of the device structure. c Optical image of the device, the distance between the five electrodes are 4, 3, 2, and 1 μm, respectively. d Transfer curve at different channel lengths, the selected electrodes are marked in the legends, the drain bias is 1.0 V. e Anisotropic transfer curve along x- and y-axis, the gate bias is from −10.0 to 10.0 V, the drain bias is fixed at 1.0 V. The inset shows the drain current under the drain bias from −1.0 to 1.0 V and the gate bias of 0 V, the current along x-axis is ∼2.24 times of the current along y-axis. f Calculated on–off ratio and field-effect mobility based on the transfer curve in (e) along x- and y-axis. g Anisotropic ratio of on/off ratio and mobility based on the data in (e). h Polarized Raman intensity mapping of tellurium nanoflake as a function of wave number and incident angle, i–k polar plot of E1-TO, A1, and E2 mode intensity. E1-TO, A1 mode are two-lobe shape, and E2 mode is four-lobe shape. The red spots are experimental results, and the blue dashed lines are fitted results. The anisotropic ratios are ∼13, ∼4, and ∼12.5 for E1-TO, A1, and E2 mode, respectively. l Absorption spectra of tellurium nanoflake, the red line is the unpolarized absorption spectra of tellurium nanoflake, with a peak located at ∼1.25 μm, and the green and blue lines are polarized absorption spectra of Te nanoflake, with the incident light polarization direction along x- and y-axis, respectively. From 1.25 to 3.0 μm, the absorption along x-axis is higher than that along y-axis, and the anisotropic ratio at 1.25 and 2.3 μm are ∼1.8 and ∼8.0, respectively.
Fig. 2Unpolarized broadband optoelectronic responses for Te nanoflake device.
a, b Photocurrent for the infrared range: 2.3 and 3.0 μm illumination under 300 K temperature, respectively, as a function of laser power and drain bias. c, d Photocurrent for the infrared range: 2.3 and 3.0 μm illumination under 77 K temperature, respectively, as a function of laser power and drain bias. e, f Pseudo-color mapping figures for R and DM*, as a function of laser power and wavelength at room temperature (300 K). The drain bias is fixed at 1.0 V, and the gate bias is 0 V, the results are in accordance with the absorption characters of Te and indicate the high performance of Te nanoflake for NIR and MIR range. g–i Photoresponses under different gate biases. The drain bias is 1.0 V, and the incident wavelength is 3.0 μm. Panels (g) and (h) show the transfer curves under different incident powers and the dark state, and (i) shows the net photocurrents under different illumination powers based on current data in (g) and (h). The maximum photocurrent is achieved at the neutral point of ∼5.9 V gate bias for all the incident powers. j The photocurrent distribution in the Te channel under 0.637 and 0.83 μm illumination at 1.0 V drain bias and 0 V gate bias, with the photocurrent generated at the channel/electrode interface. The inset shows the image of the Te device with laser spot size of ∼3 μm, scale bar, 10 μm. k, l Pseudo-color mapping figures for R and DM*, as a function of laser power and wavelength at 77 K. The drain bias is fixed at 1.0 V, and the gate bias is 0 V, much higher device performance is achieved under low temperature. m Stability verification, the photocurrent and dark current are measured at 1.0 V drain bias and 0 V gate bias, the selected illumination wavelength is 3.0 μm, with the laser power of 6.0 mW. The performance at five selected point-in-time: as fabricated, 1 day later, 7 days later, 1 month later, 3 months later, are not degraded, which indicates that the Te-based device is very stable at ambient conditions for a long time. n, o R and DM* for the measured range marked by shaded rectangles in (m), the high performance of Te is preserved for a long time.
Fig. 3Polarized optoelectronic responses for Te nanoflake devices.
a–c The net polarized photocurrent for the incident wavelengths of 0.52, 1.55, and 2.3 μm at room temperature, under the incident power of 6.0 mW, respectively. d–f Polarized photocurrent under 1.0 V drain bias and 0 V gate bias for the incident wavelengths of 0.52, 1.55, and 2.3 μm, respectively. The dots are experimental data, and the dashed lines are fitted curves based on sine curve. g–i Polar diagram of the polarized photoresponsivity under 1.0 V drain bias and 0 V gate bias for the incident wavelengths of 0.52, 1.55, and 2.3 μm, respectively, and the anisotropic ratio are 2.55, 2.39, and 7.58 for the three wavelengths, respectively.
Fig. 4Polarization imaging applications for Te nanoflake device.
a Schematic of the imaging target, with a scattering media above the target. The inset is the schematic of the text pattern HUST and SITP. b Schematic of the polarization imaging mechanism for the calculation of DoLP. c Imaging DoLP results for the nonpolarized 2H-MoTe2 device under 1.55 μm illumination for comparison. The illumination power is fixed at 1.0 mW. The DoLP is almost 0, indicating that MoTe2 device shows no polarization detection ability, which is not applicable for polarized imaging under scattering environments. d, e Imaging DoLP results for the Te device under 1.55 and 2.3 μm illumination, respectively. The imaging contrast is strong for the target due to its intrinsic excellent polarization detection ability. Scale bars in (c)–(e), 1 mm. f Normalized imaging contrast of S0 and DoLP. For MoTe2, the contrast becomes lower due to its isotropic photoresponse along any direction, and for Te device, the contrast is higher after calculating DoLP, and DoLP enhancement under 2.3 μm illumination is higher than 1.55 μm illumination due to stronger absorption anisotropy.