Literature DB >> 32385116

The Four-Kallikrein Panel Is Effective in Identifying Aggressive Prostate Cancer in a Multiethnic Population.

Burcu F Darst1, Alisha Chou2, Peggy Wan2, Loreall Pooler2, Xin Sheng2, Emily A Vertosick3, David V Conti2, Lynne R Wilkens4, Loïc Le Marchand4, Andrew J Vickers3, Hans G Lilja5,6, Christopher A Haiman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The four-kallikrein (4K) panel has been demonstrated to improve prediction of aggressive prostate cancer compared with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) among men with moderately elevated PSA levels. However, the development and testing of the 4K panel has been conducted primarily in White men, with limited data in African Americans and no studies in other racial and ethnic groups.
METHODS: We evaluated the 4K panel in a nested case-control study among African American, Latino, Japanese, Native Hawaiian, and White men in the Multiethnic Cohort. Prediagnostic blood levels of free, intact, and total PSA and human kallikrein-related peptidase 2 were measured among 1,667 incident prostate cancer cases and 691 controls with PSA ≥2 ng/mL. We evaluated the discriminative ability of the 4K panel within and across all racial/ethnic groups.
RESULTS: The 4K panel enhanced discrimination of overall prostate cancer compared with free plus total PSA and total PSA alone (AUC 0.748 vs. 0.711 and 0.669, respectively). Discrimination was further enhanced for Gleason 8+ prostate cancer, aggressive prostate cancer, and death due to prostate cancer, and to a lesser degree for nonaggressive prostate cancer. Improvement of the 4K panel over PSA was observed in each population. Adding a prostate cancer polygenic risk score slightly improved upon the discriminative ability of the 4K panel.
CONCLUSIONS: The superior discriminative ability of the 4K panel over PSA for overall and aggressive prostate cancer across multiethnic populations indicates the broad clinical applicability of the 4K panel. IMPACT: Our multiethnic investigation suggests potential for the 4K panel to improve current prostate cancer screening practices. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32385116      PMCID: PMC7334056          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  26 in total

1.  Clinical performance of the 4Kscore Test to predict high-grade prostate cancer at biopsy: A meta-analysis of us and European clinical validation study results.

Authors:  Stephen M Zappala; Peter T Scardino; David Okrongly; Vincent Linder; Yan Dong
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

2.  Long-term disease-specific functioning among prostate cancer survivors and noncancer controls in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; George Luta; Anthony B Miller; Timothy R Church; Scott P Kelly; Larry R Muenz; Kimberly M Davis; David L Dawson; Sara Edmond; Douglas Reding; Jerome E Mabie; Thomas L Riley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A Multi-Institutional Prospective Trial Confirms Noninvasive Blood Test Maintains Predictive Value in African American Men.

Authors:  Sanoj Punnen; Stephen J Freedland; Thomas J Polascik; Stacy Loeb; Michael C Risk; Stephen Savage; Sharad C Mathur; Edward Uchio; Yan Dong; Jonathan L Silberstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Detection of High Grade Prostate Cancer among PLCO Participants Using a Prespecified 4-Kallikrein Marker Panel.

Authors:  Eric H Kim; Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Daniel D Sjoberg; Melissa Assel; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  A multi-institutional prospective trial in the USA confirms that the 4Kscore accurately identifies men with high-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dipen J Parekh; Sanoj Punnen; Daniel D Sjoberg; Scott W Asroff; James L Bailen; James S Cochran; Raoul Concepcion; Richard D David; Kenneth B Deck; Igor Dumbadze; Michael Gambla; Michael S Grable; Ralph J Henderson; Lawrence Karsh; Evan B Krisch; Timothy D Langford; Daniel W Lin; Shawn M McGee; John J Munoz; Christopher M Pieczonka; Kimberley Rieger-Christ; Daniel R Saltzstein; John W Scott; Neal D Shore; Paul R Sieber; Todd M Waldmann; Fredrick N Wolk; Stephen M Zappala
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Richard M Martin; Jenny L Donovan; Emma L Turner; Chris Metcalfe; Grace J Young; Eleanor I Walsh; J Athene Lane; Sian Noble; Steven E Oliver; Simon Evans; Jonathan A C Sterne; Peter Holding; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Peter Brindle; Naomi J Williams; Elizabeth M Hill; Siaw Yein Ng; Jessica Toole; Marta K Tazewell; Laura J Hughes; Charlotte F Davies; Joanna C Thorn; Elizabeth Down; George Davey Smith; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Racial/ethnic differences in lifestyle-related factors and prostate cancer risk: the Multiethnic Cohort Study.

Authors:  Song-Yi Park; Christopher A Haiman; Iona Cheng; Sungshim Lani Park; Lynne R Wilkens; Laurence N Kolonel; Loïc Le Marchand; Brian E Henderson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening: 1986-2005.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Peter C Albertsen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Göteborg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  6 in total

1.  A Suite of Activity-Based Probes To Dissect the KLK Activome in Drug-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Scott Lovell; Leran Zhang; Thomas Kryza; Anna Neodo; Nathalie Bock; Elena De Vita; Elizabeth D Williams; Elisabeth Engelsberger; Congyi Xu; Alexander T Bakker; Maria Maneiro; Reiko J Tanaka; Charlotte L Bevan; Judith A Clements; Edward W Tate
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 16.383

2.  Prospective validation of microseminoprotein-β added to the 4Kscore in predicting high-grade prostate cancer in an international multicentre cohort.

Authors:  Peter E Lonergan; Emily A Vertosick; Melissa Assel; Daniel D Sjoberg; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Stephen A Boorjian; George G Klee; Matthew R Cooperberg; Kim Pettersson; Erica Routila; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 5.969

3.  Benefit, Harm, and Cost-effectiveness Associated With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Biopsy in Age-based and Risk-stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Callender; Mark Emberton; Stephen Morris; Paul D P Pharoah; Nora Pashayan
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 4.  Blood and urine biomarkers in prostate cancer: Are we ready for reflex testing in men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen?

Authors:  Edward K Chang; Adam J Gadzinski; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2021-06-23

5.  Induction of IDO1 and Kynurenine by Serine Proteases Subtilisin, Prostate Specific Antigen, CD26 and HtrA: A New Form of Immunosuppression?

Authors:  Felix I L Clanchy; Yi-Shu Huang; Joy Ogbechi; L Gail Darlington; Richard O Williams; Trevor W Stone
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Epidemiology and genomics of prostate cancer in Asian men.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Miao Mo; Yu Wei; Junlong Wu; Jian Pan; Stephen J Freedland; Ying Zheng; Dingwei Ye
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 14.432

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.