Literature DB >> 22734029

Long-term disease-specific functioning among prostate cancer survivors and noncancer controls in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Kathryn L Taylor1, George Luta, Anthony B Miller, Timothy R Church, Scott P Kelly, Larry R Muenz, Kimberly M Davis, David L Dawson, Sara Edmond, Douglas Reding, Jerome E Mabie, Thomas L Riley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO), we assessed the long-term disease-specific functioning among prostate cancer (PCa) survivors versus noncancer controls, the impact of trial arm (screening/usual care) on functioning, and the effect of treatment modality on functioning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PCa survivors (n = 529), 5 to 10 years postdiagnosis, were frequency-matched to noncancer controls (n = 514) for race, screening center, year of enrollment, and trial arm. Participants completed a telephone interview regarding PCa-specific symptomatology. Weights accounted for patient selection from the five PLCO screening centers. Propensity-score methods were used to balance groups of interest with respect to demographic and medical characteristics.
RESULTS: Weighted linear regression analyses revealed poorer sexual and urinary function among PCa survivors compared with noncancer controls (P < .001). Trial arm was not significantly related to any outcome (P > .31). Compared with radical prostatectomy patients (n = 201), radiation-therapy patients (n = 110) reported better sexual (P < .05) and urinary (P < .001) functioning but poorer bowel outcomes (P < .05). Survivors who received treatment combinations including androgen deprivation (n = 207) reported significantly poorer hormone-related symptoms compared with radical prostatectomy patients (P < .05). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the persistence of clinically significant, long-term PCa treatment-related sexual and urinary adverse effects up to 10 years postdiagnosis. To our knowledge, this was the first comparison of prostate-related dysfunction among screened survivors versus screened noncancer controls and indicated that these long-term problems were attributable to PCa treatment and not to aging or comorbidities. Finally, differences in long-term adverse effects between treatment modalities are particularly relevant for patients and clinicians when making treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22734029      PMCID: PMC4166119          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.2767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  43 in total

1.  Health-related quality-of-life effects of radical prostatectomy and primary radiotherapy for screen-detected or clinically diagnosed localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  J B Madalinska; M L Essink-Bot; H J de Koning; W J Kirkels; P J van der Maas; F H Schröder
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Comprehensive comparison of health-related quality of life after contemporary therapies for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  John T Wei; Rodney L Dunn; Howard M Sandler; P William McLaughlin; James E Montie; Mark S Litwin; Linda Nyquist; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  J T Wei; R L Dunn; M S Litwin; H M Sandler; M G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Health outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

Authors:  A L Potosky; J Legler; P C Albertsen; J L Stanford; F D Gilliland; A S Hamilton; J W Eley; R A Stephenson; L C Harlan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-10-04       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  The association of treatment-related symptoms with quality-of-life outcomes for localized prostate carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Constance G Bacon; Edward Giovannucci; Marcia Testa; Thomas A Glass; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The impact of cancer treatment on quality of life outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  C G Bacon; E Giovannucci; M Testa; I Kawachi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Bowel function and bother after treatment for early stage prostate cancer: a longitudinal quality of life analysis from CaPSURE.

Authors:  Mark S Litwin; Natalia Sadetsky; David J Pasta; Deborah P Lubeck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of health-related quality of life between patients with prostate carcinoma and matched controls.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Frank D Gilliland; David F Penson; S Noell Stone; William C Hunt; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study.

Authors:  Arnold L Potosky; William W Davis; Richard M Hoffman; Janet L Stanford; Robert A Stephenson; David F Penson; Linda C Harlan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Including the quality-of-life effects in the evaluation of prostate cancer screening: expert opinions revisited?

Authors:  M L Essink-Bot; I J Korfage; H J De Koning
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Short-, Intermediate-, and Long-term Quality of Life Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Ted Lee; Tyler R McClintock; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

2.  Self-Management in Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Tabitha Metreger; Daniela Wittmann; Soohyun Hwang; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Robert L Grubb; Jeffrey R Gingrich; Hui Zhu; John D Piette; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Quality of life among men with low-risk prostate cancer during the first year following diagnosis: the PREPARE prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; George Luta; Richard M Hoffman; Kimberly M Davis; Tania Lobo; Yingjun Zhou; Amethyst Leimpeter; Jun Shan; Roxanne E Jensen; David S Aaronson; Stephen K Van Den Eeden
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Managing Erectile Dysfunction After Cancer: More Than Penile Rigidity.

Authors:  Leslie R Schover
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 5.  Patient-provider communication about sexual concerns in cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Kristen Sorice; Mary Catherine Beach; Laura S Porter; James A Tulsky; Mary B Daly; Stephen J Lepore
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  The Four-Kallikrein Panel Is Effective in Identifying Aggressive Prostate Cancer in a Multiethnic Population.

Authors:  Burcu F Darst; Alisha Chou; Peggy Wan; Loreall Pooler; Xin Sheng; Emily A Vertosick; David V Conti; Lynne R Wilkens; Loïc Le Marchand; Andrew J Vickers; Hans G Lilja; Christopher A Haiman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Nanoparticle-based targeted cancer strategies for non-invasive prostate cancer intervention.

Authors:  Nicholas H Farina; Areg Zingiryan; Michael A Vrolijk; Scott D Perrapato; Steven Ades; Gary S Stein; Jane B Lian; Christopher C Landry
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  Five-year downstream outcomes following prostate-specific antigen screening in older men.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Kathy Z Fung; Katharine A Kirby; Ying Shi; Roxanne Espaldon; Sarah O'Brien; Stephen J Freedland; Adam A Powell; Richard M Hoffman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  The burden of urinary incontinence and urinary bother among elderly prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Ryan P Kopp; Lynn M Marshall; Patty Y Wang; Douglas C Bauer; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Decision making in prostate cancer screening using decision aids vs usual care: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; Randi M Williams; Kimberly Davis; George Luta; Sofiya Penek; Samantha Barry; Scott Kelly; Catherine Tomko; Marc Schwartz; Alexander H Krist; Steven H Woolf; Mary B Fishman; Carmella Cole; Edward Miller
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.