Literature DB >> 32379857

Why the Derivation of Nutrient Reference Values Should be Harmonized and How It Can be Accomplished.

Ann L Yaktine1, Janet C King2, Lindsay H Allen3.   

Abstract

The adoption of a panel of Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) in place of a single recommended intake allowed for assessment of nutritional adequacy and safe upper intake levels for nutrients on a population level and for individuals. The Average Requirement (AR) and Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) comprise 2 core NRVs needed to obtain accurate, comparable estimates of population-level nutrient intakes, which are necessary to plan and evaluate nutrition support programs globally. Harmonizing the derivation of NRVs, particularly the AR and UL, is essential to ensure inclusion of all countries, whether high-, middle-, or low-income, in the process and to improve access for all users to the tools and data needed to carry it out. The NRV process today is more rigorous and transparent than the first derivation of DRIs because of adoption of systematic reviews and bias assessment methodologies, updated food and nutrient databases, data on cultural and context-specific dietary patterns, and better metabolic markers of nutritional status. A proposed framework for the derivation of NRVs builds on available methodologies to support the NRV process; however, this is not sufficient to achieve harmonization of the process. Fundamental to moving forward toward harmonization is removing existing barriers, including limited access to resources and databases and variance in terminology used to identify specific NRVs; adoption of more rigorous and transparent methodologies, including chronic disease endpoints, in the review process; and creating a central repository for easily accessible evidence. Chief among the barriers to harmonization is a willingness of global bodies to support an agreed-upon approach to the derivation process. Improving access to tools and data resources and providing guidance and support to encourage their adoption are critical to achieving harmonization of the NRV process. The factorial approach for calculating a nutrient requirement is described as the sum of total endogenous nutrient loss (endogenous fecal, urinary, integumental, seminal, menstrual) divided by its bioavailability or fractional absorption.
Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Average Requirement; Dietary Reference Intakes; Nutrient Reference Values; Tolerable Upper Intake Level; harmonization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32379857      PMCID: PMC7490149          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmaa048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   11.567


  7 in total

Review 1.  Harmonization of nutrient intake values.

Authors:  Janet C King; Cutberto Garza
Journal:  Food Nutr Bull       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.069

2.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

3.  Dietary reference values for food energy and nutrients for the United Kingdom. Report of the Panel on Dietary Reference Values of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond)       Date:  1991

Review 4.  History of Nutrition: The Long Road Leading to the Dietary Reference Intakes for the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Suzanne P Murphy; Allison A Yates; Stephanie A Atkinson; Susan I Barr; Johanna Dwyer
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 5.  Perspective: Proposed Harmonized Nutrient Reference Values for Populations.

Authors:  Lindsay H Allen; Alicia L Carriquiry; Suzanne P Murphy
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 6.  Zinc supplementation in public health.

Authors:  Mary Edith Penny
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.374

Review 7.  Zinc supplementation in young children: A review of the literature focusing on diarrhoea prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Selma C Liberato; Gurmeet Singh; Kim Mulholland
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 7.324

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Limited data exist to inform our basic understanding of micronutrient requirements in pregnancy.

Authors:  Emily R Smith; Siran He; Kevin C Klatt; Matthew D Barberio; Ali Rahnavard; Negeena Azad; Carolyn Brandt; Bethany Harker; Emily Hogan; Padmini Kucherlapaty; Dina Moradian; Alison D Gernand; Homa K Ahmadzia
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 14.136

2.  Vitamin D intakes and health outcomes in infants and preschool children: Summary of an evidence report.

Authors:  Andrew R Beauchesne; Kelly Copeland Cara; Danielle M Krobath; Laura Paige Penkert; Shruti P Shertukde; Danielle S Cahoon; Belen Prado; Ruogu Li; Qisi Yao; Jing Huang; Tee Reh; Mei Chung
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.