Literature DB >> 31701998

Perspective: Proposed Harmonized Nutrient Reference Values for Populations.

Lindsay H Allen1, Alicia L Carriquiry2, Suzanne P Murphy3.   

Abstract

Two core nutrient intake reference values (NRVs) are required for assessing the adequacy and safety of nutrient intakes for population groups: the average requirement (AR) and the tolerable upper level of intake (UL). Applications of such assessments include providing advice to improve intakes, formulating complementary foods, estimating the amounts of nutrients to be added to fortified foods and monitoring changes in intake, and product labeling at the global, national, or regional level. However, there is a lack of unity across country-level organizations in the methodological approach used to derive NRVs, and ARs and ULs are lacking in many compilations, thus limiting the ability to assess nutrient intakes for their population groups. Because physiological requirements vary little across populations globally, and setting reference values requires determining an acceptable level of uncertainty, it is feasible to adapt current recommendations from different sources to harmonize these core reference values. The objective of this review is to demonstrate an approach for harmonizing the NRVs for ARs (here termed "H-ARs") and ULs ("H-ULs") that can be applied on a global scale to assessing intakes across populations. The approach incorporates the framework and terminology recommended by reports from the United Nations University, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), the Institute of Medicine (IOM), and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). After reviewing available alternatives, the proposed harmonized values were selected from standards set by EFSA (for Europe) and the IOM (for the United States and Canada), giving priority to those published most recently. Justifications for the proposed values are presented, along with discussion of their limitations. Ideally, these methods should be further reviewed by an international group of experts. Meanwhile, the H-ARs and H-ULs suggested in this review can be used to assess intakes of populations for many applications in global and regional contexts. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  harmonized average requirement; harmonized upper level; nutrient intake recommendations; nutrient reference value; nutrient requirement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31701998      PMCID: PMC7231601          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmz096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  7 in total

1.  Dietary reference intakes: vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc.

Authors:  P Trumbo; A A Yates; S Schlicker; M Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2001-03

2.  Using Dietary Reference Intake-based methods to estimate the prevalence of inadequate nutrient intake among school-aged children.

Authors:  Carol West Suitor; Philip M Gleason
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-04

3.  Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids.

Authors:  Paula Trumbo; Sandra Schlicker; Allison A Yates; Mary Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-11

Review 4.  Highlights of 'a model for establishing upper levels of intake for nutrients and related substances: report of a Joint FAO/WHO Technical Workshop on Nutrient Risk Assessment, May 2-6, 2005'.

Authors:  Christine Lewis Taylor
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.110

5.  Vitamin C pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers: evidence for a recommended dietary allowance.

Authors:  M Levine; C Conry-Cantilena; Y Wang; R W Welch; P W Washko; K R Dhariwal; J B Park; A Lazarev; J F Graumlich; J King; L R Cantilena
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  2007

7.  Nutrient intakes of infants and toddlers.

Authors:  Barbara Devaney; Paula Ziegler; Susan Pac; Vatsala Karwe; Susan I Barr
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2004-01
  7 in total
  24 in total

Review 1.  Strengthening national nutrition research: rationale and options for a new coordinated federal research effort and authority.

Authors:  Sheila E Fleischhacker; Catherine E Woteki; Paul M Coates; Van S Hubbard; Grace E Flaherty; Daniel R Glickman; Thomas R Harkin; David Kessler; William W Li; Joseph Loscalzo; Anand Parekh; Sylvia Rowe; Patrick J Stover; Angie Tagtow; Anthony Joon Yun; Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Anemia Etiology in Ethiopia: Assessment of Nutritional, Infectious Disease, and Other Risk Factors in a Population-Based Cross-Sectional Survey of Women, Men, and Children.

Authors:  Christopher T Andersen; Amare Worku Tadesse; Sabri Bromage; Habtamu Fekadu; Elena C Hemler; Simone Passarelli; Donna Spiegelman; Christopher R Sudfeld; Alemayehu Worku; Yemane Berhane; Wafaie W Fawzi
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Fortified Balanced Energy-Protein Supplementation, Maternal Anemia, and Gestational Weight Gain: A Randomized Controlled Efficacy Trial among Pregnant Women in Rural Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Giles Hanley-Cook; Laeticia C Toe; Kokeb Tesfamariam; Brenda de Kok; Alemayehu Argaw; Anderson Compaoré; Moctar Ouédraogo; Trenton Dailey-Chwalibóg; Patrick Kolsteren; Carl Lachat; Lieven Huybregts
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.687

4.  Precision in prescription: multiple micronutrient supplements in pregnancy.

Authors:  Anura V Kurpad; Harshpal Singh Sachdev
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 38.927

5.  Why the Derivation of Nutrient Reference Values Should be Harmonized and How It Can be Accomplished.

Authors:  Ann L Yaktine; Janet C King; Lindsay H Allen
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 11.567

6.  Vegans, Vegetarians and Pescatarians Are at Risk of Iodine Deficiency in Norway.

Authors:  Synne Groufh-Jacobsen; Sonja Y Hess; Inger Aakre; Elin Lovise Folven Gjengedal; Kristina Blandhoel Pettersen; Sigrun Henjum
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Ten2Twenty-Ghana: Study Design and Methods for an Innovative Randomized Controlled Trial with Multiple-Micronutrient-Fortified Biscuits among Adolescent Girls in Northeastern Ghana.

Authors:  Fusta Azupogo; Abdul-Razak Abizari; Saskia J M Osendarp; Edith J Feskens; Inge D Brouwer
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2021-01-08

8.  The Potential Contribution of Fortified Maize Flour, Oil, Rice, Salt, and Wheat Flour to Estimated Average Requirements and Tolerable Upper Intake Levels for 15 Nutrients in 153 Countries.

Authors:  Helena Pachón; Bethany Reynolds; Michelle Duong; Becky L Tsang; Lana Childs; Corey L Luthringer; Yunhee Kang; Florencia C Vasta; Karen Codling
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Agri-nutrition research: Revisiting the contribution of maize and wheat to human nutrition and health.

Authors:  Nigel Poole; Jason Donovan; Olaf Erenstein
Journal:  Food Policy       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Comprehensive Nutrient Gap Assessment (CONGA): A method for identifying the public health significance of nutrient gaps.

Authors:  Ty Beal; Jessica M White; Joanne E Arsenault; Harriet Okronipa; Guy-Marino Hinnouho; Saul S Morris
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 7.110

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.