The programmed construction of functional synthetic cells requires spatial control over arrays of biomolecules within the cytomimetic environment. The mimicry of the natural hierarchical assembly of biomolecules remains challenging due to the lack of an appropriate molecular toolbox. Herein, we report the implementation of DNA-decorated supramolecular assemblies as dynamic and responsive nanoscaffolds for the localization of arrays of DNA signal cargo within hierarchically assembled complex coacervate protocells. Protocells stabilized with a semipermeable membrane allow trafficking of single-stranded DNA between neighboring protocells. DNA duplex operations demonstrate the responsiveness of the nanoscaffolds to different input DNA strands via the reversible release of DNA cargo. Moreover, a second population of coacervate protocells with nanoscaffolds featuring a higher affinity for the DNA cargo enabled chemically programmed communication between both protocell populations. This combination of supramolecular structure and function paves the way for the next generation of protocells imbued with programmable, lifelike behaviors.
The programmed construction of functional synthetic cells requires spatial control over arrays of biomolecules within the cytomimetic environment. The mimicry of the natural hierarchical assembly of biomolecules remains challenging due to the lack of an appropriate molecular toolbox. Herein, we report the implementation of DNA-decorated supramolecular assemblies as dynamic and responsive nanoscaffolds for the localization of arrays of DNA signal cargo within hierarchically assembled complex coacervate protocells. Protocells stabilized with a semipermeable membrane allow trafficking of single-stranded DNA between neighboring protocells. DNA duplex operations demonstrate the responsiveness of the nanoscaffolds to different input DNA strands via the reversible release of DNA cargo. Moreover, a second population of coacervate protocells with nanoscaffolds featuring a higher affinity for the DNA cargo enabled chemically programmed communication between both protocell populations. This combination of supramolecular structure and function paves the way for the next generation of protocells imbued with programmable, lifelike behaviors.
The storage, manipulation, and
utilization of information-rich molecules such as DNA has long been
a goal in the field of bottom-up synthetic cells, alongside compartmentalization
and metabolism.[1] Information processing
is not only limited to DNA transcription and subsequent protein expression
but also manifests as a wide range of behaviors we commonly associate
with living systems, such as stimuli responsiveness, adaptability,
and communication. At their core, these behaviors revolve around signal
transduction, with cells sensing and responding to environmental cues.
While this is a challenging concept to mimic in purely synthetic,
bottom-up systems, progress is being made, and synthetic cells have
been designed to transduce both chemical[2−9] and nonchemical signals such as light[10,11] or mechanical
force.[12] However, many of these systems
remain synthetically challenging, requiring at some point external
manipulation to obtain their final structure. We present here a unique
approach to obtaining signal transduction in synthetic cells, with
the hierarchical organization of supramolecular components into localized
signaling hubs, generating a robust, modular, and synthetically accessible
protocell platform.Complex coacervates, formed via the electrostatic
complexation
of oppositely charged macromolecules, are seeing increased application
as bottom-up synthetic cell platforms. These crowded, highly charged,
and cell-sized droplets are interesting for both their cytomimetic
properties as well as their innate ability to sequester and concentrate
a wide range of biologically relevant macromolecules[13−15] and functional subcompartments.[16,17] The structural
stability of the otherwise rapidly coalescing coacervate droplets
can successfully be controlled by the use of fatty acids,[18,19] silica nanoparticles,[17] or, in the case
of the research presented herein, block copolymers.[20] This semipermeable membrane enables the sequestration of
macromolecular entities and assemblies while simultaneously permitting
the translocation of small molecules for signaling and catalysis.[21]Within coacervate-based synthetic cells,
the processing of information-rich
molecules has predominantly been focused on the concentration and
resultant enhancement in reaction kinetics of nucleotide processing
enzymes[22] and the incorporation of in vitro transcription–translation processes.[23,24] The engineered colocalization of arrays of biomolecules inside protocells,
mimicking the hierarchical self-assembly of proteins or nucleotides,
has, however, seen limited attention given the lack of the appropriate
molecular toolbox. In this regard, synthetic DNA-based supramolecular
systems form ideal nanoscaffolds to colocalize arrays of relevant
biomolecules toward the mimicry of their biological counterparts,[25−27] as its unique coded structure facilitates the design of reliable,
predictable, and biocompatible interactions[28−31] such as DNA-based computing and
communication in proteinosome protocells.[2] In this communication, we report utilization of a toolbox of orthogonal,
hierarchical supramolecular interactions to assemble DNA localization
hubs within cytomimetic particles. These unique structures are shown
to transduce external chemical signals into an internal spatial organization
which, when paired with the semipermeable membrane, enables interprotocell
communication. This combination of supramolecular DNA nanotechnology
within hierarchically organized protocells is an exciting direction
and offers a range of possibilities toward the development of more
elegant tools for signal localization within synthetic cells.This system is formed via the hierarchical self-assembly of functional
components (Figure ). First, the negatively charged supramolecular nanoscaffold and
anionic carboxymethyl-functionalized amylose (CM-Am) were combined,
and coacervation was initiated by the addition of amylose functionalized
with a cationic quaternary amine (Q-Am). Droplet coalescence was arrested
by the introduction of a synthetic block terpolymer designed with
a careful balance between electrostatic, hydrophilic, and hydrophobic
interactions (Figure b).[20] The terpolymer consists of a poly(ethylene
glycol) (PEG) peripheral chain that prevents the incorporation of
the terpolymer inside the coacervate droplet, a poly((ε-caprolactone)-gradient-(trimethylene carbonate)) (PCLgTMC) hydrophobic
core to ensure the rearrangement of the terpolymer around the protocell,
and a peripheral poly(glutamic acid) (PGlu) anionic chain that anchors
the terpolymer to the coacervate core through long-range electrostatic
interactions.[20,21]
Figure 1
Depiction of protocell loading and formation.
(a) Supramolecular
nanoscaffold, CM-Am, and Q-Am are mixed to form coacervate microdroplets
through multivalent electrostatic interactions. (b) Chemical structure
of the stabilizing terpolymer, that when added to the protocells,
avoids protocell coalescence and serves as a semipermeable membrane.
(c) Schematic representation of the supramolecular DNA nanoscaffold
inside the coacervate protocells. (d) Overview of the potential of
the nanoscaffold-loaded protocell to act as a DNA localization hub
and to feature programmed interprotocell communication.
Depiction of protocell loading and formation.
(a) Supramolecular
nanoscaffold, CM-Am, and Q-Am are mixed to form coacervate microdroplets
through multivalent electrostatic interactions. (b) Chemical structure
of the stabilizing terpolymer, that when added to the protocells,
avoids protocell coalescence and serves as a semipermeable membrane.
(c) Schematic representation of the supramolecular DNA nanoscaffold
inside the coacervate protocells. (d) Overview of the potential of
the nanoscaffold-loaded protocell to act as a DNA localization hub
and to feature programmed interprotocell communication.The supramolecular nanoscaffold implemented in this study
consists
of previously reported amphiphilic monomers made of bis-pyridine-based C3-symmetrical discotic molecules decorated with
single-stranded DNA strands (Figure a). The DNA-decorated monomers self-assemble into columnar
stacks, displaying multiple colocalized copies of single-stranded
DNA in a quasi-1D fashion, capable of further interactions with other
complementary strands via DNA duplex formation.[25,26] Nanoscaffolds were strongly sequestered within coacervate protocells
with an incorporation efficiency >99%, as determined by confocal
microscopy[16] (Figure b). The columnar stacks remained assembled
upon incorporation,
confirmed by bulk fluorescence spectroscopy (Figure S1) and a lack of punctae formation when only fluorescently
labeled single-stranded DNA was encapsulated (Figure b). Control experiments revealed that sequestration
of the nanoscaffold was driven by the phosphate backbone of covalently
attached DNA strands, confirmed by the lackluster uptake of fluorescent
dyes by themselves and DNA free, dye-labeled discotics (Figure S2). As these assemblies are approximately
100 nm long,[32] they appeared as diffraction-limited
punctae. Importantly, the relatively large size of the nanoscaffolds
prevent them from crossing the terpolymer membrane (Figure S3), which ensures that specific DNA sequences are
unique to a protocell at formation. Furthermore, the dynamic nature
of these assemblies is retained upon incorporation within the coacervate
core. Time-lapse fluorescence images (Supplementary Video 1) revealed movement of the fluorescent dots, demonstrating
that the nanoscaffold is not immobilized within the protocells and
that the coacervate core simulates the fluidity and dynamic behavior
desired for a biomimetic system. Supramolecular assembly dynamics
are also retained. Increasing concentrations of DNA-functionalized
monomers without Cy3-label cause a distinct increase in the emission
of Cy3-labeled monomers, as fluorophores are on average further apart
and thus experience lower degrees of self-quenching (Figure c). These results show that
the assembly of this complex multicomponent system is driven by orthogonal
supramolecular interactions, thus providing a robust platform within
which to perform DNA-based operations.
Figure 2
(a) Molecular structure
of the DNA-decorated discotic monomer that
self-assembles into columnar stacks in water, resulting in DNA-decorated
supramolecular nanoscaffolds. (b) The negatively charged nature of
DNA drives strong sequestration into coacervate protocells. Whereas
ssDNA freely diffuses throughout the coacervate (top), the supramolecular
nanoscaffolds force the localization of DNA templates into distinct
punctae (bottom). Top and bottom scale bars represent 10 and 5 μm,
respectively. (c) Dilution and subsequent dequenching of the Cy3-labeled
supramolecular nanoscaffold with nonlabeled DNA-decorated monomers
(white side chains) demonstrate retention of supramolecular dynamics
within the coacervate. Bar graphs represent the mean Cy3 fluorescence
of each coacervate. Scale bars represent 20 μm.
(a) Molecular structure
of the DNA-decorated discotic monomer that
self-assembles into columnar stacks in water, resulting in DNA-decorated
supramolecular nanoscaffolds. (b) The negatively charged nature of
DNA drives strong sequestration into coacervate protocells. Whereas
ssDNA freely diffuses throughout the coacervate (top), the supramolecular
nanoscaffolds force the localization of DNA templates into distinct
punctae (bottom). Top and bottom scale bars represent 10 and 5 μm,
respectively. (c) Dilution and subsequent dequenching of the Cy3-labeled
supramolecular nanoscaffold with nonlabeled DNA-decorated monomers
(white side chains) demonstrate retention of supramolecular dynamics
within the coacervate. Bar graphs represent the mean Cy3 fluorescence
of each coacervate. Scale bars represent 20 μm.The specific and reversible recruitment of spatially confined
biomolecules
in the coacervate protocell is the first step in recapitulating biomimetic
signal transduction in a synthetic setting. Here, the display of high
fidelity single-stranded DNA recognition sites by the supramolecular
nanoscaffold opens new possibilities for the straightforward implementation
of robust DNA-duplex based operations. Protocell-specific responses
to external, DNA-based signals are enabled by the ability of single-stranded
DNA to freely diffuse through the semipermeable membrane to find persistent,
localized arrays of nanoscaffold-bound DNA. To ensure coacervate formation
under the required salt conditions for hybridization (5 mM MgCl2), the ratio of oppositely charged amylose derivatives was
kept equivalent (1:1 mass ratio of Q-Am:CM-Am) (Figure S4). We then designed a reporting system that could
rapidly indicate the assembly states of DNA signals within the coacervate
protocells. This system (Figure ) comprises a supramolecular nanoscaffold (DNA nanoscaffold 1) that facilitates the colocalization of a complementary
reporter DNA strand (Cy5-Reporter) in response to variable incoming
signal DNA strands (Fuel and Antifuel). First, the Cy3-labeled DNA
nanoscaffold 1 alone (at 40 nM) exhibited the characteristic
fluorescent punctae when imaging with the Cy3 channel. Subsequent
addition of Cy5-Reporter (5 nM) resulted in the concomitant colocalization
of both dyes over 25 min, confirming DNA-duplex formation on the nanoscaffold
(Figures a, S5). Control experiments with a mismatching supramolecular
nanoscaffold together with Cy5-Reporter (Figure
S6) did not feature any Cy3/Cy5 colocalization. Cy5-Reporter
can be displaced from nanoscaffold 1 via so-called toehold
DNA strand displacement with the addition of an external stimulus
(Fuel strand, 100 nM) that features a higher affinity to nanoscaffold 1 (Figure b). The release of Cy5-Reporter leads to its homogeneous distribution
throughout the coacervate protocell, approximately 30 min after the
addition of the fuel strand. This reorganization of Cy5-Reporter within
the protocell core also results in a 10-fold increase in the average
intensity of the Cy5 channel (Figure S5) due to fluorescence dequenching when released from the supramolecular
nanoscaffold. A concomitant increase in the Cy3 channel fluorescence
intensity from the nanoscaffold is also observed. This behavior was
not an artifact of heterogeneous local concentrations of reactants,
as the same reorganization was observed when Cy5-Reporter was preincubated
with nanoscaffold 1 for 2 h prior to Fuel strand addition
to ensure complete hybridization (Figure S7).
Figure 3
Schematic and accompanying single plane confocal images of nanoscaffold-mediated
DNA location control. (a) Addition of complementary Cy5-Reporter strand
to the exterior of protocells results in colocalization on the supramolecular
nanoscaffold. (b) The spatial organization of Cy5-Reporter strand
can be controlled by the addition of a Fuel displacer strand, releasing
the Cy5-Reporter from the supramolecular nanoscaffold. (c) This process
can be reverted by the addition of an Antifuel strand, which binds
the Fuel strand and allows the Cy5-Reporter to return to the supramolecular
nanoscaffold. Scale bars represent 10 μm.
Schematic and accompanying single plane confocal images of nanoscaffold-mediated
DNA location control. (a) Addition of complementary Cy5-Reporter strand
to the exterior of protocells results in colocalization on the supramolecular
nanoscaffold. (b) The spatial organization of Cy5-Reporter strand
can be controlled by the addition of a Fuel displacer strand, releasing
the Cy5-Reporter from the supramolecular nanoscaffold. (c) This process
can be reverted by the addition of an Antifuel strand, which binds
the Fuel strand and allows the Cy5-Reporter to return to the supramolecular
nanoscaffold. Scale bars represent 10 μm.The programmable nature of DNA allows to reverse this spatial reorganization
in a sequence-specific manner. To relocalize Cy5-Reporter on nanoscaffold 1, the Fuel strand needs to first be displaced. This was accomplished
by an Antifuel strand that outcompetes nanoscaffold 1 for the Fuel strand, resulting in a clearly observable change in
the distribution of Cy5-Reporter from homogeneous back to punctate,
colocalized structures (Figures c, S5c, Supplementary Video 2). These experiments highlight the ability
of this supramolecular system to receive external chemical signals
and transduce them into reversible outputs, namely the protocell-wide
spatial organization of macromolecules.The ability to control
the spatial organization of functional molecules
coupled with a semipermeable membrane make this system an ideal candidate
for cell–cell communication. This was demonstrated by the addition
of a second population of coacervate protocells loaded with an analogous,
FAM-labeled nanoscaffold 2 that can capture any Cy5-Reporter
that is released from a separate population containing nanoscaffold 1. The system is designed so that the diffusing Cy5-Reporter
features a higher affinity for nanoscaffold 2 than for 1. The translocation of Cy5-Reporter between neighboring coacervate
populations upon the addition of Fuel strands is observable by the
colocalization of Cy5/FAM in the nanoscaffold 2 population
of protocells (Figures , S8a, Supplementary Video 3). While there is a slow background translocation of
Cy5-Reporter, the addition of Fuel clearly accelerates this process
(Figure S8b). Successful transmission of
an information-rich signal between synthetic cells is facilitated
by the semipermeable interface, which both effectively limits content
mixing, creating discrete populations, while permitting free translocation
of small DNA signaling strands.
Figure 4
(a) Communication of a DNA signal between
coacervate protocells
loaded with supramolecular nanoscaffolds 1 and 2. (b) Confocal microscopy images showing the Cy3, FAM, and
Cy5 channels. The Cy3 channel shows the DNA colocalized arrays of
nanoscaffold 1, while the FAM channel shows the equivalent
for nanoscaffold 2. The colocalization of Cy5 dyes in
the nanoscaffold 2 protocell and the reversion to a homogeneous
Cy5 distribution in nanoscaffold 1 protocells after Fuel
strand addition indicate successful communication between protocells.
Scale bar represents 15 μm. (c) Quantification of Cy5 fluorescence
within both populations over time.
(a) Communication of a DNA signal between
coacervate protocells
loaded with supramolecular nanoscaffolds 1 and 2. (b) Confocal microscopy images showing the Cy3, FAM, and
Cy5 channels. The Cy3 channel shows the DNA colocalized arrays of
nanoscaffold 1, while the FAM channel shows the equivalent
for nanoscaffold 2. The colocalization of Cy5 dyes in
the nanoscaffold 2 protocell and the reversion to a homogeneous
Cy5 distribution in nanoscaffold 1 protocells after Fuel
strand addition indicate successful communication between protocells.
Scale bar represents 15 μm. (c) Quantification of Cy5 fluorescence
within both populations over time.Here, we demonstrated the hierarchical assembly of a synthetic
cell platform capable of localized signal transduction. The electrostatically
driven incorporation of supramolecular localization hubs has provided
the individual protocells with information-rich signatures, enabling
the binding and up-concentration of DNA-based signaling molecules
at specific loci. Combined with the semipermeable terpolymer membrane,
these protocells can receive and transduce external signals, effecting
changes in local spatial organization and the transmission of a DNA-based
reporter. This control over the positioning of information-rich molecules
in bottom-up synthetic cells has important ramifications for the next
generation of synthetic cells, enabling a range of biologically relevant
responses to external DNA signals or for the modulation of internal
structure or assembly of enzyme cascades. These responses have the
potential to initiate a range of downstream processes, creating more
complex, quorum-based biomimetic behaviors.
Authors: Ruud J R W Peters; Maïté Marguet; Sébastien Marais; Marco W Fraaije; Jan C M van Hest; Sébastien Lecommandoux Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Marlies Nijemeisland; Loai K E A Abdelmohsen; Wilhelm T S Huck; Daniela A Wilson; Jan C M van Hest Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 14.553
Authors: Alexander F Mason; N Amy Yewdall; Pascal L W Welzen; Jingxin Shao; Marleen van Stevendaal; Jan C M van Hest; David S Williams; Loai K E A Abdelmohsen Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 14.553
Authors: N Amy Yewdall; Bastiaan C Buddingh; Wiggert J Altenburg; Suzanne B P E Timmermans; Daan F M Vervoort; Loai K E A Abdelmohsen; Alexander F Mason; Jan C M van Hest Journal: Chembiochem Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Yuval Elani; Tatiana Trantidou; Douglas Wylie; Linda Dekker; Karen Polizzi; Robert V Law; Oscar Ces Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Simon Rothenbühler; Adrian Gonzalez; Ioan Iacovache; Simon M Langenegger; Benoît Zuber; Robert Häner Journal: Org Biomol Chem Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 3.890
Authors: Tsuyoshi Mashima; Marleen H M E van Stevendaal; Femke R A Cornelissens; Alexander F Mason; Bas J H M Rosier; Wiggert J Altenburg; Koji Oohora; Shota Hirayama; Takashi Hayashi; Jan C M van Hest; Luc Brunsveld Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2022-02-26 Impact factor: 16.823