A systemic feature of eukaryotic cells is the spatial organization of functional components through compartmentalization. Developing protocells with compartmentalized synthetic organelles is, therefore, a critical milestone toward emulating one of the core characteristics of cellular life. Here we demonstrate the bottom-up, multistep, noncovalent, assembly of rudimentary subcompartmentalized protocells through the spontaneous encapsulation of semipermeable, polymersome proto-organelles inside cell-sized coacervates. The coacervate microdroplets are membranized using tailor-made terpolymers, to complete the hierarchical self-assembly of protocells, a system that mimics both the condensed cytosol and the structure of a cell membrane. In this way, the spatial organization of enzymes can be finely tuned, leading to an enhancement of functionality. Moreover, incompatible components can be sequestered in the same microenvironments without detrimental effect. The robust stability of the subcompartmentalized coacervate protocells in biocompatible milieu, such as in PBS or cell culture media, makes it a versatile platform to be extended toward studies in vitro, and perhaps, in vivo.
A systemic feature of eukaryotic cells is the spatial organization of functional components through compartmentalization. Developing protocells with compartmentalized synthetic organelles is, therefore, a critical milestone toward emulating one of the core characteristics of cellular life. Here we demonstrate the bottom-up, multistep, noncovalent, assembly of rudimentary subcompartmentalized protocells through the spontaneous encapsulation of semipermeable, polymersome proto-organelles inside cell-sized coacervates. The coacervate microdroplets are membranized using tailor-made terpolymers, to complete the hierarchical self-assembly of protocells, a system that mimics both the condensed cytosol and the structure of a cell membrane. In this way, the spatial organization of enzymes can be finely tuned, leading to an enhancement of functionality. Moreover, incompatible components can be sequestered in the same microenvironments without detrimental effect. The robust stability of the subcompartmentalized coacervate protocells in biocompatible milieu, such as in PBS or cell culture media, makes it a versatile platform to be extended toward studies in vitro, and perhaps, in vivo.
Compartmentalization
is key for the emergence of eukaryotic life,
facilitating stepwise enhancements in complexity toward increasingly
functional forms of hierarchically structured matter.[1,2] With growing interest in the development of synthetic cell-like
architectures (protocells), various forms of micro- and nanostructures
that mimic essential cellular properties and processes have been presented.[3−5] To date, protocell research has largely focused on the development
of discrete chemical platforms such as membrane-free protocells (coacervates,[6−11] hydrogel particles,[12,13] or aqueous two-phase systems[14,15]) and membrane-bound protocells (liposomes,[16] proteinosomes,[8] colloidosomes,[5,17] polymeric nanoparticles,[18] or polymersomes[19,20]). These first-generation protocells have been implemented to advance
fundamental understanding into the physicochemical hallmarks of living
systems.[21] With an emphasis on the engineering
of hybrid systems, next-generation protocells seek to take this a
step further, increasing structural and functional complexity by implementing
multicompartmentalization.[22−28] Exemplifying this, bottom-up engineering of cell-mimetic liposomes
(loaded with enzymes)[29] have been subcompartmentalized
within polymeric particles, displaying temperature-dependent localization.[30] Top-down approaches have also been adopted,
bridging the divide between natural and synthetic systems by incorporating
biological organelles within protocells[31] and, conversely, amalgamating synthetic organelles with cells, imparting
new functionality.[32−36] The hierarchical assembly of subcompartmentalized systems is a key
milestone in the development of protocells—a process that showcases
the multistep, noncovalent assembly of complex materials that resemble
lifelike systems.[37] Here, we present a
multicompartmentalized, coacervate-based protocell capable of spontaneously
assimilating new functional elements, in a process akin to protocellular
endosymbiosis. This hybrid system integrates distinct attributes of
eukaryotic cells: where crowdedness, hierarchical structure, spatial
organization of enzymes, and compatibility with cellular media are
realized combined to establish a truly groundbreaking synthetic cell
platform. In living systems, the semipermeable nature of both internal
organelles and outer cell membrane allows the exchange of chemical
information on the intracellular and extracellular level, owing to
the ubiquitous lipid bilayer. Seeking to emulate this in the next
generation of protocells, this hierarchical platform provides an important
advance toward mimicking the systemic complexity observed in eukaryotic
cells.This route toward the hierarchical assembly of such a
subcompartmentalized
protocell harnesses the potential of coacervates to spontaneously
enrich their function via sequestration of polymersomal organelles.
In this case, polymersomes comprising poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(caprolactone-gradient-trimethylene
carbonate) (PEG–PCLgTMC) block copolymers are implemented,
which possess a semipermeable membrane and can be readily loaded with
enzymatic cargo. For example, PEG–PCLgTMC polymersomes, loaded
with an antioxidant enzyme, have been utilized as synthetic organelles
after incorporation into living cells.[32] Here we demonstrate the spontaneous recruitment of such synthetic
(proto-) organelles by coacervate microdroplets, shuttling various
functional cargoes inside the protocell. The ability of coacervates
to sequester functional subcomponents is an important aspect of their
protocellular behavior;[15,31] however, the lack of
structural stability imbued by a membrane undermines this advantageous
property. Recently, we presented a strategy for the membranization
of complex coacervate microdroplets using a bespoke terpolymer (based
upon PEG–PCLgTMC) that interacts electrostatically with amylose-based
coacervates.[38] Membranized coacervates
have prolonged stability under aqueous buffer conditions, as well
as a semipermeable exterior that allows transmembrane diffusion of
small molecule substrates.[39] Chemical homology
between the external membrane and inner proto-organelles (embedded
in the cytosol-mimetic coacervate) makes this an exciting system for
the exploration of more complex cell-mimetic behaviors (as depicted
in Scheme ). This
hierarchical protocell affords us control over the spatial organization
of enzymes and their reactions, facilitating the study of two main
functional consequences of compartmentalization: the creation of favorable
microenvironments and the ability to segregate incompatible components.
Having observed the sequestration of functional (enzyme-loaded) polymersomal
proto-organelles into coacervates, we then studied the effect of a
spatially organized cascade reaction using the glucose oxidase (GOx)/horseradish
peroxidase (HRP) cascade. Thereafter, we established the ability to
segregate incompatible digestive enzymes (in this case proteinase
K) into proto-lysosomes, where susceptible macromolecular species
are protected from degradation. Lastly, the stability of this subcompartmentalized
protocellular system was demonstrated in a coculture experiment, attempting
to bridge the conceptual interface between living and nonliving architectures.
The conceptual relationship between biological and protocellular architectures
was showcased in a synthetic coculture experiment, constituting a
significant advancement at the chemical biology interface. Overall,
this hierarchical system represents a significant step forward for
the field of multicompartmentalized synthetic cells, where it not
only incorporates both cytosol-mimetic and membrane-bound features
but also exists as a fully open and addressable system—with
aqueous stability and semipermeability facilitating chemical communication
with the outside environment.
Scheme 1
Formation of a Hierarchical Protocell
Through the spontaneous sequestration
of polymersomal proto-organelles by a coacervate microdroplet (A); subsequent membranization with a synthetic terpolymer
(B) provides stability to the overall construct, which
was evaluated to demonstrate the advantageous properties of a spatially
organized, subcompartmentalized system (C) that mimics
the advanced properties of a eukaryotic cell.
Formation of a Hierarchical Protocell
Through the spontaneous sequestration
of polymersomal proto-organelles by a coacervate microdroplet (A); subsequent membranization with a synthetic terpolymer
(B) provides stability to the overall construct, which
was evaluated to demonstrate the advantageous properties of a spatially
organized, subcompartmentalized system (C) that mimics
the advanced properties of a eukaryotic cell.
Results
and Discussion
In general, the sequestration of cargo by
coacervates is dependent
on physicochemical complementarity (based on electrostatic, hydrophobic,
and steric factors), whereby bulky, uncharged hydrophilic or unfavorably
charged components are excluded.[40] For
example, we have recently observed that electrostatically driven sequestration
occurs, where negatively charged proteins preferentially partition
within coacervates through interaction with positively charged amylose,
which is present in stoichiometric excess in the coacervate phase.[38] This was enhanced by increasing the negative
surface charge of proteins through succinylation, increasing their
encapsulation efficiency to ∼90% in the case of bovine serum
albumin (BSA). The capacity for electrostatically driven sequestration
of components into coacervates provides a pathway for the uptake of
polymersomal proto-organelles. The formation of functional proto-organelles
was achieved by encapsulating proteins inside PEG–PCLgTMC polymersomes
via the direct hydration method (Scheme A), where the encapsulating proteins in PBS
are added quickly to a solution of block copolymer in low molecular
weight PEG.[32] Nonencapsulated proteins
were removed using extensive dialysis. Polymersome purification was
validated using a combination of size exclusion chromatography and
UV (SEC-UV), which showed no trace of unencapsulated proteins (Figure S3A). These functional nanostructures
were determined to be approximately 160 nm in diameter, using cryotransmission
electron microscopy (Figure S3B). The sequestration
efficiency (i.e., the amount of material sequestered by the coacervate
under the conditions used) of polymersomes loaded with neutral fluorescent
protein (sfGFP) was low (2.9 ± 0.2%, Figure S4A), presumably due to the hydrophilic nature of surface PEG
chains despite the slight negative zeta-potential of −7 ±
2 mV (Figure S5A). In order to drive integration
of polymersomes, without altering the chemical nature of the compartment
directly, it was possible to modulate charge characteristics through
the encapsulation of charged cargo. Following the general principles
of Coulombic potential, it was expected that the incorporation of
negatively charged (succinylated) proteins in the polymersome core
would result in an increase in the potential at the surface (radius
ca. 80 nm, Figure S6).Indeed, the
zeta-potential of polymersomes loaded with succinylated
cargo (in this case FITC-BSA) became more negative (−22 ±
4 mV, Figure S5A) and resulted in a marked
increase of the sequestration efficiency up to 8.9 ± 0.4% (Figure S4B). In order to confirm that the structure
of cargo-loaded polymersome is as expected (unequivocally showing
that proteins were loaded in the core rather than at the corona),
a combination of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation and multiangle
light scattering (AF4-MALS) was used. Light scattering analysis of
polymersomes with encapsulated succinylated proteins clearly showed
a reduction in the radius of gyration (Rg) values when compared with empty polymersomes, indicating the presence
of proteins within the inner cavity (Figure S5B). In this way, succinylated cargo can enhance sequestration of polymersomal
proto-organelles by coacervates, driving functional assimilation in
such a hierarchical system.To recap, the formation of subcompartmentalized
protocells was
achieved using negatively charged polymersomes (loaded with succinylated
protein cargo) that were spontaneously sequestered by the coacervates
(Scheme B), followed
by addition of membranizing terpolymer once the freely coalescing
coacervate microdroplets were cell-sized (ca. 20 μm, Scheme C). The structural
integrity imparted to the coacervate by the terpolymer membrane provides
a stable protocell interface that maintains its discrete structure
even after gentle centrifugation (Figure S7). Without membranization, coacervate microdroplets rapidly coalesced
to form an unstructured condensed phase (Figure S8). We demonstrated the capacity of this system to control
spatial organization of macromolecular cargo (located within proto-organelles)
by using three separate populations of polymersomes, containing different
fluorescent proteins, sequestered into coacervate microdroplets (Figure ). The uptake of
polymersomes by coacervates did not undermine their structural integrity,
as confocal images showed distinct, punctuated structures, indicative
of intact nanoparticles that have retained their cargo within discrete
subcompartments. Importantly, we observed a homogeneous distribution
of these proto-organelles without undesirable aggregation, modeling
the organization of organelles within the cell (Figure S9).
Figure 1
Hierarchical protocell sequestering three distinct subpopulations
of polymersomal proto-organelles loaded with fluorescently labeled
proteins. (A) Confocal micrograph of multicompartmentalized protocell
(containing FITC-, RITC-, and Cy5-labeled succinylated bovine serum
albumin (BSA) in separate vesicles) encapsulated within membranized
coacervate protocells—depicted in (B), which is not drawn to
scale.
Hierarchical protocell sequestering three distinct subpopulations
of polymersomal proto-organelles loaded with fluorescently labeled
proteins. (A) Confocal micrograph of multicompartmentalized protocell
(containing FITC-, RITC-, and Cy5-labeled succinylated bovine serum
albumin (BSA) in separate vesicles) encapsulated within membranized
coacervate protocells—depicted in (B), which is not drawn to
scale.One of the hallmarks of compartmentalization
is the propensity
of condensed functional components to enhance internal processing
of molecular signals in communication cascades or metabolic cycles.
To realize this functional benefit of spatial organization using the
subcompartmentalized copolymer/coacervate protocell model, the well-studied
enzymatic cascade of glucose oxidase (GOx) and horseradish peroxidase
(HRP) was chosen.[41−46] As GOx consumes glucose, it produces gluconolactone and hydrogen
peroxide, the latter of which is thereafter used by HRP in the oxidation
of pro-fluorescent amplex red (10-acetyl-3,7-dihydroxyphenoxazine)
to resorufin (Figure A). All of the proteins were succinylated, and, in each experimental
scenario, the encapsulated and coencapsulated concentrations of proteins
were matched so that results were directly comparable (Table S3). The zeta-potentials of different polymersomes,
containing either succinylated GOx, succinylated HRP, or both succinylated
GOx and HRP, were comparable (Table S2),
leading to similar degrees of sequestration into the coacervate. Two
main conclusions can be drawn from the results of these enzymatic
assays (Figure B, Figure S10). First, the kinetic advantages of
coencapsulation (Figure B, black trace) over separate enzyme encapsulation (red trace) were
clearly observed. In the case of separately encapsulated GOx and HRP,
the intermediate substrate (H2O2) produced by
GOx faces diffusometric barriers before it can be converted by HRP.[32] Conversely, in the coencapsulated system, H2O2 can diffuse directly to HRP before escaping
the proto-organelle, thereby increasing the overall turnover rate.
Second, the cascade still functions despite physical separation of
the catalytic components, which highlights the ability of such proto-organelles
to communicate in a cytosol-like environment. This is a direct consequence
of the semipermeable nature of both the protocell terpolymer membrane
and the membrane of the polymersomes (that are chemically homologous).
Regarding functional activation, due to colocalization or substrate
channeling, this is an active subject of ongoing research debate and
one that requires further, dedicated study.[47−50] However, these studies are often
performed in open systems that do not take into account the effect
of compartmentalization and how this affects substrate, intermediate,
and product diffusion.[51] Here, our system
provides a platform for the further investigation of these phenomena,
by spatially confining (different) enzymes within polymersomal proto-organelles,
encapsulated in the condensed cytosol-like coacervate core of the
protocells.
Figure 2
Coencapsulation of enzymes in the multicompartment protocell leads
to an enhancement in the overall rate of reaction. (A) The enzyme
cascade utilized. Glucose is oxidized by glucose oxidase to form gluconolactone
and H2O2, which then diffuses to horseradish
peroxidase, catalyzing the formation of fluorescent resorufin from
amplex red. (B) Overall enzymatic rates of reaction as determined
by bulk resorufin fluorescence in a plate reader. Coencapsulation
of enzymes in polymersomes results in a rate increase compared to
separately encapsulated enzymes. (C) Confocal images showing resorufin
production over time inside a protocell containing coencapsulated
GOx/HRP polymersomes (scale bars = 5 μm).
Coencapsulation of enzymes in the multicompartment protocell leads
to an enhancement in the overall rate of reaction. (A) The enzyme
cascade utilized. Glucose is oxidized by glucose oxidase to form gluconolactone
and H2O2, which then diffuses to horseradish
peroxidase, catalyzing the formation of fluorescent resorufin from
amplex red. (B) Overall enzymatic rates of reaction as determined
by bulk resorufin fluorescence in a plate reader. Coencapsulation
of enzymes in polymersomes results in a rate increase compared to
separately encapsulated enzymes. (C) Confocal images showing resorufin
production over time inside a protocell containing coencapsulated
GOx/HRP polymersomes (scale bars = 5 μm).Another consequence of spatial organization in the cell is
to separate
and stabilize discrete processes so that, for example, digestive enzymes
are confined to the lysosomal system and are not permitted to interfere
with the complex chemistry occurring in the rest of the cell.[52] This is facilitated by the size of digestive
enzymes, which are unable to permeate the lipid bilayer, a key characteristic
mirrored by the copolymeric membranes surrounding the coacervate and
the polymersomal proto-organelles. In order to study this, the accessibility
of proteinase K (ProtK), a powerful proteolytic enzyme, was restricted
through confinement in polymersomal proto-lysosomes that prevented
digestion of a pro-fluorescent substrate (BSA-FITC). Through labeling
BSA with a large excesses of fluorescein (FITC), which self-quenched
on the surface, a pro-fluorescent protease substrate was prepared
that released highly fluorescent polypeptide fragments upon proteolytic
degradation by ProtK (Figure A). The protocellular membrane was able to shield internally
sequestered FITC-BSA from degradation by external ProtK enzymes.
Figure 3
Spatial
organization and isolation of macromolecules leads to control
over their degradation. (A) Overlabeling of BSA with FITC leads to
self-quenching, until ProtK digestion. (B) Bulk fluorescence emission
spectroscopy of self-assembled systems. When free in solution, this
model reaction progresses rapidly (black curve); however, BSA-FITC
can be protected from degradation via both encapsulation in coacervate
protocells (red curve) and subcompartmentalization of ProtK in polymersomes
(blue curve). Please note: at 50 s, the protease K solution was added
to the FITC-BSA protocell experiment (red), and this accounts for
the high error observed. (C) Confocal micrograph demonstrating coencapsulation
of both FITC-BSA substrate (false colored blue) with RITC-labeled
ProtK polymersomes (false colored yellow) within coacervate protocells
(scale bars = 20 μm).
Spatial
organization and isolation of macromolecules leads to control
over their degradation. (A) Overlabeling of BSA with FITC leads to
self-quenching, until ProtK digestion. (B) Bulk fluorescence emission
spectroscopy of self-assembled systems. When free in solution, this
model reaction progresses rapidly (black curve); however, BSA-FITC
can be protected from degradation via both encapsulation in coacervate
protocells (red curve) and subcompartmentalization of ProtK in polymersomes
(blue curve). Please note: at 50 s, the protease K solution was added
to the FITC-BSA protocell experiment (red), and this accounts for
the high error observed. (C) Confocal micrograph demonstrating coencapsulation
of both FITC-BSA substrate (false colored blue) with RITC-labeled
ProtK polymersomes (false colored yellow) within coacervate protocells
(scale bars = 20 μm).Furthermore, through subcompartmentalization in polymersomal
proto-lysosomes,
ProtK could be integrated within the protocell with no detectable
degradation of the coacervate-sequestered FITC-BSA (Figure B). This coexistence of substrate
and proto-lysosome within the protocell was confirmed using confocal
microscopy (Figure C), which shows superposition of homogeneous fluorescence from the
substrate and, highly punctuated, fluorescence from the ProtK-loaded
polymersomes. Such control over the spatial organization and localization
of incompatible components behind semipermeable membranes is akin
to the protection of proteins from the digestive environment within
the lysosome, paving the way for incorporation of highly functional,
yet potentially incompatible microenvironments within the next generation
of protocells.The physical interface between proto- and living
cells is an exciting
frontier, where we can explore the boundaries of biomimetic functionality
in synthetic systems. However, the limited stability of existing protocellular
constructs, reflected by the use of nonbiological medium during their
fabrication, has meant this interface between living systems and synthetic
protocells is largely unexplored. Typically, complex coacervates are
prone to disassembly under high salt concentrations due to their electrostatic
nature.[53,54] In contrast, our subcompartmentalized coacervate
protocells display stability in high salt, physiologically relevant
milieu such as vascular cell basal medium (VCBM) (Figure ). Even after 24 h of incubation,
protocells retained structural integrity, highlighting the robust
nature of this platform for the future exploration of protocellular
interactions with living cells (Figure S11). With the capacity to generate protocellular architectures that
now mimic core features of the cell, such as spatial organization
and subcompartmentalization, which are stable in physiological conditions,
the opportunities to take this forward in complexity are tantalizing.
Figure 4
Confocal
microscopy image of coacervate protocells stained with
Nile red (A) formed in VCBM and (B) after 24 h of dialysis (scale
bars = 20 μm).
Confocal
microscopy image of coacervate protocells stained with
Nile red (A) formed in VCBM and (B) after 24 h of dialysis (scale
bars = 20 μm).
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the ability
to generate subcompartmentalized
protocells, through multistep, noncovalent assembly, whereby proto-organelles
are spontaneously captured by coacervate microdroplets prior to membranization—inspired
by the structure of eukaryotic cells. Such hierarchical protocells
are able to control the spatial organization of macromolecular cargo,
localized within polymersomal organelles. In this way, spontaneous
uptake of loaded polymersomes can imbue function into coacervate-based
protocells. Using this novel system, we showcase both activation of
cascade processes and segregation of incompatible enzymes (mimicking
localization of proteases to lysosomal organelles). Finally, we highlight
the stability and versatility of this subcompartmentalized protocell
in physiologically relevant media, proof-of-principle for the potential
of this platform at the chemical biology interface.
Authors: Suzanne M Kuiper; Madhavan Nallani; Dennis M Vriezema; Jeroen J L M Cornelissen; Jan C M van Hest; Roeland J M Nolte; Alan E Rowan Journal: Org Biomol Chem Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Stijn F M van Dongen; Madhavan Nallani; Jeroen J L M Cornelissen; Roeland J M Nolte; Jan C M van Hest Journal: Chemistry Date: 2009 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Sheref S Mansy; Jason P Schrum; Mathangi Krishnamurthy; Sylvia Tobé; Douglas A Treco; Jack W Szostak Journal: Nature Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Eva Magdalena Estirado; Alexander F Mason; Miguel Ángel Alemán García; Jan C M van Hest; Luc Brunsveld Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Wiggert J Altenburg; N Amy Yewdall; Daan F M Vervoort; Marleen H M E van Stevendaal; Alexander F Mason; Jan C M van Hest Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Lucila Navarro; Andreas F Thünemann; Tadahiro Yokosawa; Erdmann Spiecker; Daniel Klinger Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 16.823