Literature DB >> 32355619

The Utility of Cervical Spine Bracing As a Postoperative Adjunct to Multilevel Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

Ian F Caplan1, Saurabh Sinha1, Benjamin Osiemo2,3, Scott D McClintock3, James M Schuster1, Harvey Smith4, Gregory Glauser1, Nikhil Sharma1, Ali K Ozturk1, Zarina S Ali1, Neil R Malhotra1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of cervical bracing/collar subsequent to anterior cervical spine discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is variable. Outcomes data regarding bracing after ACDF are limited. Here, we study the impact of bracing on short-term outcomes related to safety, quality of care, and direct costs in multilevel ACDF.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort analyses of all consecutive patients undergoing multilevel ACDF with or without bracing from 2013 to 2017 was undertaken (n = 616). Patient demographics and comorbidities were analyzed. Tests of independence and logistic regressions were used to assess differences in length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition (home, assisted rehabilitation facility [ARF], or skilled nursing facility [SNF]), quality-adjusted life year (QALY), direct cost, readmission within 30 days, and emergency room (ER) visits within 30 days.
RESULTS: Amongst the study population, 553 were braced and 63 were not braced. There was no difference in comorbidities (P > .05) such as obesity, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and problem list number. A significant difference in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was found, with more ASA 2 patients in the braced cohort and more ASA 3 patients in the unbraced cohort (P = .007). LOS was extended for the unbraced group (median 156.9 ± 211.4 versus 86.67 ± 130.6 h, P = .003), and ER visits within 30 days were 0.21 times less likely in the braced group (P = .006). There was no difference in readmission (P = .181), QALY gain (P = .968), and direct costs (P = .689).
CONCLUSION: Bracing following multilevel cervical fixation does not alter short-term postoperative course or reduce the risk for early adverse outcomes in a significant manner. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF); cervical fixation; multilevel bracing

Year:  2020        PMID: 32355619      PMCID: PMC7188086          DOI: 10.14444/7022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  46 in total

1.  Initial intervertebral stability after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating.

Authors:  David Mourning; Charles A Reitman; Michael H Heggeness; Stephen I Esses; John A Hipp
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Bracing of the trunk and neck has a differential effect on head control during gait.

Authors:  S Morrison; D M Russell; K Kelleran; M L Walker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft.

Authors:  Michael G Kaiser; Regis W Haid; Brian R Subach; Bryan Barnes; Gerald E Rodts
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Trends in resource utilization and rate of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion throughout the United States from 2006 to 2013.

Authors:  Comron Saifi; Arielle W Fein; Alejandro Cazzulino; Ronald A Lehman; Frank M Phillips; Howard S An; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Efficacy, safety, and economics of bracing after spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mary P Zhu; Lindsay A Tetreault; Fatimah Sorefan-Mangou; Philip Garwood; Jefferson R Wilson
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  A Randomized Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Zero-Profile and Traditional Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery for Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Shenghua He; Hualong Feng; Zhiming Lan; Juyi Lai; Zhitao Sun; Yeguang Wang; Jian Wang; Zhiqiang Ren; Feiqiang Huang; Fuguang Xu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Artificial disk replacement combined with midlevel ACDF versus multilevel fusion for cervical disk disease involving 3 levels.

Authors:  Liangqi Kang; Dasheng Lin; Zhenqi Ding; Bowei Liang; Kejian Lian
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  The effectiveness of various cervical orthoses. An in vivo comparison of the mechanical stability provided by several widely used models.

Authors:  A J Sandler; J Dvorak; T Humke; D Grob; W Daniels
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Choice of plate may affect outcomes for single versus multilevel ACDF: results of a prospective randomized single-blind trial.

Authors:  Pierce D Nunley; Ajay Jawahar; Eubulus J Kerr; David A Cavanaugh; Christopher Howard; Stephen M Brandao
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Is Cervical Bracing Necessary After One- and Two-Level Instrumented Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Samuel C Overley; Robert K Merrill; Evan O Baird; Joshua J Meaike; Samuel K Cho; Andrew C Hecht; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Short-Term Impact of Bracing in Multi-Level Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Ryan Dimentberg; Saurabh Sinha; Gregory Glauser; Ian F Caplan; James M Schuster; Scott D McClintock; Jang W Yoon; Paul J Marcotte; Zarina S Ali; Neil R Malhotra
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

Review 2.  Biomaterials for Interbody Fusion in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Zhonghan Wang; Yang Wang; Zuhao Li; Bo Chao; Shixian Liu; Wangwang Luo; Jianhang Jiao; Minfei Wu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.