BACKGROUND: Clinical practice in postoperative bracing after posterior lumbar spine fusion (PLF) is inconsistent between providers. This paper attempts to assess the effect of bracing on short-term outcomes related to safety, quality of care, and direct costs. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients undergoing multilevel PLF with or without bracing (2013-2017) was undertaken (n = 980). Patient demographics and comorbidities were analyzed. Outcomes assessed included length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), surgical-site infection (SSI), total cost, readmission within 30 days, and emergency department (ED) evaluation within 30 days. RESULTS: Amongst the study population, 936 were braced and 44 were not braced. There was no difference between the braced and unbraced cohorts regarding LOS (P = .106), discharge disposition (P = .898), 30-day readmission (P = .434), and 30-day ED evaluation (P = 1.000). There was also no difference in total cost (P = .230) or QALY gain (P = .740). The results indicate a significantly lower likelihood of SSI in the braced population (1.50% versus 6.82%, odds ratio = 0.208, 95% confidence interval = 0.057-0.751, P = .037). There was no difference in relevant comorbidities (P = .259-1.000), although the braced cohort was older than the unbraced cohort (63 versus 56 y, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Bracing following multilevel posterior lumbar fixation does not alter short-term postoperative course or reduce the risk for early adverse events. Cost analysis show no difference in direct costs between the 2 treatment approaches. Short-term data suggest that removal of bracing from the postoperative regimen for PLF will not result in increased adverse outcomes. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice in postoperative bracing after posterior lumbar spine fusion (PLF) is inconsistent between providers. This paper attempts to assess the effect of bracing on short-term outcomes related to safety, quality of care, and direct costs. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients undergoing multilevel PLF with or without bracing (2013-2017) was undertaken (n = 980). Patient demographics and comorbidities were analyzed. Outcomes assessed included length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), surgical-site infection (SSI), total cost, readmission within 30 days, and emergency department (ED) evaluation within 30 days. RESULTS: Amongst the study population, 936 were braced and 44 were not braced. There was no difference between the braced and unbraced cohorts regarding LOS (P = .106), discharge disposition (P = .898), 30-day readmission (P = .434), and 30-day ED evaluation (P = 1.000). There was also no difference in total cost (P = .230) or QALY gain (P = .740). The results indicate a significantly lower likelihood of SSI in the braced population (1.50% versus 6.82%, odds ratio = 0.208, 95% confidence interval = 0.057-0.751, P = .037). There was no difference in relevant comorbidities (P = .259-1.000), although the braced cohort was older than the unbraced cohort (63 versus 56 y, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Bracing following multilevel posterior lumbar fixation does not alter short-term postoperative course or reduce the risk for early adverse events. Cost analysis show no difference in direct costs between the 2 treatment approaches. Short-term data suggest that removal of bracing from the postoperative regimen for PLF will not result in increased adverse outcomes. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Authors: Dennis S Meredith; Christopher K Kepler; Russel C Huang; Barry D Brause; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2011-12-10 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Joseph Featherall; Jacob A Miller; E Emily Bennett; Daniel Lubelski; Hannah Wang; Tagreed Khalaf; Ajit A Krishnaney Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Joseph S Butler; Scott C Wagner; Patrick B Morrissey; Ian D Kaye; Arjun S Sebastian; Gregory D Schroeder; Kristen Radcliff; Alexander R Vaccaro Journal: Clin Spine Surg Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Saurabh Sinha; Ian Caplan; James Schuster; Matthew Piazza; Gregory Glauser; Nikhil Sharma; William Charles Welch; Benjamin Osiemo; Scott Mcclintock; Ali Kemal Ozturk; Neil Rainer Malhotra Journal: Asian J Neurosurg Date: 2020-05-29
Authors: Keith S Kaye; Kristine Schmit; Carl Pieper; Richard Sloane; Kathleen F Caughlan; Daniel J Sexton; Kenneth E Schmader Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-02-24 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Jesse E Bible; Debdut Biswas; Peter G Whang; Andrew K Simpson; Glenn R Rechtine; Jonathan N Grauer Journal: Spine J Date: 2008-09-14 Impact factor: 4.166