Literature DB >> 21688942

Crossmodal semantic priming by naturalistic sounds and spoken words enhances visual sensitivity.

Yi-Chuan Chen1, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

We propose a multisensory framework based on Glaser and Glaser's (1989) general reading-naming interference model to account for the semantic priming effect by naturalistic sounds and spoken words on visual picture sensitivity. Four experiments were designed to investigate two key issues: First, can auditory stimuli enhance visual sensitivity when the sound leads the picture as well as when they are presented simultaneously? And, second, do naturalistic sounds (e.g., a dog's "woofing") and spoken words (e.g., /dɔg/) elicit similar semantic priming effects? Here, we estimated participants' sensitivity and response criterion using signal detection theory in a picture detection task. The results demonstrate that naturalistic sounds enhanced visual sensitivity when the onset of the sounds led that of the picture by 346 ms (but not when the sounds led the pictures by 173 ms, nor when they were presented simultaneously, Experiments 1-3A). At the same SOA, however, spoken words did not induce semantic priming effects on visual detection sensitivity (Experiments 3B and 4A). When using a dual picture detection/identification task, both kinds of auditory stimulus induced a similar semantic priming effect (Experiment 4B). Therefore, we suggest that there needs to be sufficient processing time for the auditory stimulus to access its associated meaning to modulate visual perception. Besides, the interactions between pictures and the two types of sounds depend not only on their processing route to access semantic representations, but also on the response to be made to fulfill the requirements of the task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21688942     DOI: 10.1037/a0024329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  27 in total

1.  Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test.

Authors:  Cesare V Parise; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Audio-visual object search is changed by bilingual experience.

Authors:  Sarah Chabal; Scott R Schroeder; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Semantic incongruity influences response caution in audio-visual integration.

Authors:  Benjamin Steinweg; Fred W Mast
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Multisensory constraints on awareness.

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Yi-Chuan Chen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The organization of words and environmental sounds in memory.

Authors:  Kristi Hendrickson; Matthew Walenski; Margaret Friend; Tracy Love
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Localizing semantic interference from distractor sounds in picture naming: A dual-task study.

Authors:  Andreas Mädebach; Marie-Luise Kieseler; Jörg D Jescheniak
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

8.  The organization of words and environmental sounds in the second year: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Kristi Hendrickson; Tracy Love; Matthew Walenski; Margaret Friend
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2018-10-08

9.  Validity of an eyetracking method for capturing auditory-visual cross-format semantic priming.

Authors:  Javad Anjum; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  Listening to speech and non-speech sounds activates phonological and semantic knowledge differently.

Authors:  James Bartolotti; Scott R Schroeder; Sayuri Hayakawa; Sirada Rochanavibhata; Peiyao Chen; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.