Debra Haire-Joshu1, Alexandra B Morshed, Allison Phad, Shelly Johnston, Rachel G Tabak. 1. Center for Diabetes Translation Research (Drs Haire-Joshu and Tabak and Mss Phad and Johnston), Center for Obesity Prevention and Policy Research (Dr Haire-Joshu), and Prevention Research Center (Drs Morshed and Tabak), the Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review was to use RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) to assess the extent to which weight gain prevention studies targeting young adults reported on elements of external validity. DESIGN: Systematic review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles of interest included a lifestyle/behavioral intervention targeting weight gain prevention. Eligibility criteria included the following: study design of randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized control trials, or natural experiments; average participant age between 18 and 35 years; study duration of at least 12 months; and published in English between January 2008 and May 2018. Studies had to report weight or body mass index as a measured outcome and were excluded if they were paired with smoking cessation programs, were conducted in specific groups (ie, pregnant women, breast cancer survivors), or were follow-ups to weight loss studies. STUDY SELECTION: After removing duplicates, the search yielded 11426 articles. Titles and abstracts were screened by 1 reviewer; 144 articles were assessed in a full-text review by 2 reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Nine studies (13 articles) were included in the review. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Reported elements of the RE-AIM framework. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies met the selection criteria. All studies lacked full reporting on external validity elements. Of the total of 60 RE-AIM reporting criteria, 8 were reported by all 9 studies, 26 criteria were reported by fewer than 4 studies, and 22 criteria were not reported by any of the studies. DISCUSSION: There remains inadequate reporting of elements of external validity and generalizability in weight gain prevention studies. This is a significant scientific constraint that limits the information required to disseminate and implement prevention of weight gain interventions for population impact. Standardized reporting may be needed to ensure results that demonstrate not only internal validity but also external validity and generalizability are needed to promote public health impact.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review was to use RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) to assess the extent to which weight gain prevention studies targeting young adults reported on elements of external validity. DESIGN: Systematic review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles of interest included a lifestyle/behavioral intervention targeting weight gain prevention. Eligibility criteria included the following: study design of randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized control trials, or natural experiments; average participant age between 18 and 35 years; study duration of at least 12 months; and published in English between January 2008 and May 2018. Studies had to report weight or body mass index as a measured outcome and were excluded if they were paired with smoking cessation programs, were conducted in specific groups (ie, pregnant women, breast cancer survivors), or were follow-ups to weight loss studies. STUDY SELECTION: After removing duplicates, the search yielded 11426 articles. Titles and abstracts were screened by 1 reviewer; 144 articles were assessed in a full-text review by 2 reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Nine studies (13 articles) were included in the review. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Reported elements of the RE-AIM framework. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies met the selection criteria. All studies lacked full reporting on external validity elements. Of the total of 60 RE-AIM reporting criteria, 8 were reported by all 9 studies, 26 criteria were reported by fewer than 4 studies, and 22 criteria were not reported by any of the studies. DISCUSSION: There remains inadequate reporting of elements of external validity and generalizability in weight gain prevention studies. This is a significant scientific constraint that limits the information required to disseminate and implement prevention of weight gain interventions for population impact. Standardized reporting may be needed to ensure results that demonstrate not only internal validity but also external validity and generalizability are needed to promote public health impact.
Authors: Isabelle Boutron; Douglas G Altman; David Moher; Kenneth F Schulz; Philippe Ravaud Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Kendra K Kattelmann; Adrienne A White; Geoffrey W Greene; Carol Byrd-Bredbenner; Sharon L Hoerr; Tanya M Horacek; Tandalayo Kidd; Sarah Colby; Beatrice W Phillips; Mallory M Koenings; Onikia N Brown; Melissa Olfert; Karla P Shelnutt; Jesse Stabile Morrell Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: C E Lewis; D R Jacobs; H McCreath; C I Kiefe; P J Schreiner; D E Smith; O D Williams Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2000-06-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Rena R Wing; Deborah F Tate; Mark A Espeland; Cora E Lewis; Jessica Gokee LaRose; Amy A Gorin; Judy Bahnson; Letitia H Perdue; Karen E Hatley; Erica Ferguson; Katelyn R Garcia; Wei Lang Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Russell E Glasgow; Samantha M Harden; Bridget Gaglio; Borsika Rabin; Matthew Lee Smith; Gwenndolyn C Porter; Marcia G Ory; Paul A Estabrooks Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2019-03-29
Authors: Juliano Schwartz; Paul Oh; Shannon S D Bredin; Ryan E Rhodes; Maira B Perotto; Alejandro Gaytán-González; Darren E R Warburton Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-10-08 Impact factor: 4.964