Literature DB >> 32320971

Computational model for detector timing effects in Compton-camera based prompt-gamma imaging for proton radiotherapy.

Paul Maggi1, Steve Peterson2, Rajesh Panthi3, Dennis Mackin3, Hao Yang4, Zhong He4,5, Sam Beddar3, Jerimy Polf1,6.   

Abstract

This paper describes a realistic simulation of a Compton-camera (CC) based prompt-gamma (PG) imaging system for proton range verification for a range of clinical dose rates, and its comparison to PG measured data with a pre-clinical CC. We used a Monte Carlo plus Detector Effects (MCDE) model to simulate the production of prompt gamma-rays (PG) and their energy depositions in the CC. With Monte Carlo, we simulated PG emission resulting from irradiation of a high density polyethylene phantom with a 150 MeV proton pencil beam at dose rates of 5.0 × 108, 2.6 × 109, and 4.6 × 109 p+ s-1. Realistic detector timing effects (e.g. delayed triggering time, event-coincidence, dead time, etc,) were added in post-processing to allow for flexible count rate variations. We acquired PG emission measurements with our pre-clinical CC during irradiation with a clinical 150 MeV proton pencil beam at the same dose rates. For simulations and measurements, three primary changes could be seen in the PG emission data as the dose rate increased: (1) reduction in the total number of detected events due to increased dead-time percentage; (2) increase in false-coincidence events (i.e. multiple PGs interacting, rather than a single PG scatter); and (3) loss of distinct PG emission peaks in the energy spectrum. We used the MCDE model to estimate the quality of our measured PG data, primarily with regards to true and false double-scatters and triple-scatters recorded by the CC. The simulation results showed that of the recorded double-scatter PG interactions 22%, 57%, and 70% were false double-scatters and for triple-scatter interactions 3%, 21%, and 35% were false events at 5.0 × 108, 2.6 × 109, and 4.6 × 109 p+ s-1, respectively. These false scatter events represent noise in the data, and the high percentage of these events in the data represents a major limitation in our ability to produce usable PG images with our prototype CC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32320971      PMCID: PMC8808425          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab8bf0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  13 in total

1.  Imaging of prompt gamma rays emitted during delivery of clinical proton beams with a Compton camera: feasibility studies for range verification.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Stephen Avery; Dennis S Mackin; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Towards direct reconstruction from a gamma camera based on Compton scattering.

Authors:  M J Cree; P J Bones
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  GATE V6: a major enhancement of the GATE simulation platform enabling modelling of CT and radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Jan; D Benoit; E Becheva; T Carlier; F Cassol; P Descourt; T Frisson; L Grevillot; L Guigues; L Maigne; C Morel; Y Perrot; N Rehfeld; D Sarrut; D R Schaart; S Stute; U Pietrzyk; D Visvikis; N Zahra; I Buvat
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Feasibility Studies of a New Event Selection Method to Improve Spatial Resolution of Compton Imaging for Medical Applications.

Authors:  E Draeger; S Peterson; D Mackin; H Chen; S Beddar; J C Polf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-10

5.  Noise evaluation of Compton camera imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  P G Ortega; I Torres-Espallardo; F Cerutti; A Ferrari; J E Gillam; C Lacasta; G Llosá; J F Oliver; P R Sala; P Solevi; M Rafecas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Performance of MACACO Compton telescope for ion-beam therapy monitoring: first test with proton beams.

Authors:  Paola Solevi; Enrique Muñoz; Carles Solaz; Marco Trovato; Peter Dendooven; John E Gillam; Carlos Lacasta; Josep F Oliver; Magdalena Rafecas; Irene Torres-Espallardo; Gabriela Llosá
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  3D prompt gamma imaging for proton beam range verification.

Authors:  E Draeger; D Mackin; S Peterson; H Chen; S Avery; S Beddar; J C Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Evaluation of a stochastic reconstruction algorithm for use in Compton camera imaging and beam range verification from secondary gamma emission during proton therapy.

Authors:  Dennis Mackin; Steve Peterson; Sam Beddar; Jerimy Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Compton-based prompt gamma imaging using ordered origin ensemble algorithm with resolution recovery in proton therapy.

Authors:  Zhiyang Yao; Yongshun Xiao; Zhiqiang Chen; Bo Wang; Qinhan Hou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Compton Camera and Prompt Gamma Ray Timing: Two Methods for In Vivo Range Assessment in Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Fernando Hueso-González; Fine Fiedler; Christian Golnik; Thomas Kormoll; Guntram Pausch; Johannes Petzoldt; Katja E Römer; Wolfgang Enghardt
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  3 in total

1.  The effects of Compton camera data acquisition and readout timing on PG imaging for proton range verification.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Paul Maggi; Rajesh Panthi; Stephen Peterson; Dennis Mackin; Sam Beddar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-05

2.  Secondary Particle Interactions in a Compton Camera Designed for in vivo Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Rajesh Panthi; Paul Maggi; Stephen Peterson; Dennis Mackin; Jerimy Polf; Sam Beddar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-12

3.  Applications of Machine Learning to Improve the Clinical Viability of Compton Camera Based in vivo Range Verification in Proton Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Carlos A Barajas; Stephen W Peterson; Dennis S Mackin; Sam Beddar; Lei Ren; Matthias K Gobbert
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2022-04-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.