Literature DB >> 25658644

Noise evaluation of Compton camera imaging for proton therapy.

P G Ortega1, I Torres-Espallardo, F Cerutti, A Ferrari, J E Gillam, C Lacasta, G Llosá, J F Oliver, P R Sala, P Solevi, M Rafecas.   

Abstract

Compton Cameras emerged as an alternative for real-time dose monitoring techniques for Particle Therapy (PT), based on the detection of prompt-gammas. As a consequence of the Compton scattering process, the gamma origin point can be restricted onto the surface of a cone (Compton cone). Through image reconstruction techniques, the distribution of the gamma emitters can be estimated, using cone-surfaces backprojections of the Compton cones through the image space, along with more sophisticated statistical methods to improve the image quality. To calculate the Compton cone required for image reconstruction, either two interactions, the last being photoelectric absorption, or three scatter interactions are needed. Because of the high energy of the photons in PT the first option might not be adequate, as the photon is not absorbed in general. However, the second option is less efficient. That is the reason to resort to spectral reconstructions, where the incoming γ energy is considered as a variable in the reconstruction inverse problem. Jointly with prompt gamma, secondary neutrons and scattered photons, not strongly correlated with the dose map, can also reach the imaging detector and produce false events. These events deteriorate the image quality. Also, high intensity beams can produce particle accumulation in the camera, which lead to an increase of random coincidences, meaning events which gather measurements from different incoming particles. The noise scenario is expected to be different if double or triple events are used, and consequently, the reconstructed images can be affected differently by spurious data. The aim of the present work is to study the effect of false events in the reconstructed image, evaluating their impact in the determination of the beam particle ranges. A simulation study that includes misidentified events (neutrons and random coincidences) in the final image of a Compton Telescope for PT monitoring is presented. The complete chain of detection, from the beam particle entering a phantom to the event classification, is simulated using FLUKA. The range determination is later estimated from the reconstructed image obtained from a two and three-event algorithm based on Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization. The neutron background and random coincidences due to a therapeutic-like time structure are analyzed for mono-energetic proton beams. The time structure of the beam is included in the simulations, which will affect the rate of particles entering the detector.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25658644     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/5/1845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

Review 1.  In vivo range verification in particle therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Jerimy C Polf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Compton imaging for medical applications.

Authors:  Hideaki Tashima; Taiga Yamaya
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-07-22

3.  The effects of Compton camera data acquisition and readout timing on PG imaging for proton range verification.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Paul Maggi; Rajesh Panthi; Stephen Peterson; Dennis Mackin; Sam Beddar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-05

4.  3D prompt gamma imaging for proton beam range verification.

Authors:  E Draeger; D Mackin; S Peterson; H Chen; S Avery; S Beddar; J C Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Computational model for detector timing effects in Compton-camera based prompt-gamma imaging for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Paul Maggi; Steve Peterson; Rajesh Panthi; Dennis Mackin; Hao Yang; Zhong He; Sam Beddar; Jerimy Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Electron-tracking Compton camera imaging of technetium-95m.

Authors:  Yuichi Hatsukawa; Takehito Hayakawa; Kazuaki Tsukada; Kazuyuki Hashimoto; Tetsuya Sato; Masato Asai; Atsushi Toyoshima; Toru Tanimori; Shinya Sonoda; Shigeto Kabuki; Hiroyuki Kimura; Atsushi Takada; Tetsuya Mizumoto; Seiya Takaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Proton range verification with MACACO II Compton camera enhanced by a neural network for event selection.

Authors:  Enrique Muñoz; Ana Ros; Marina Borja-Lloret; John Barrio; Peter Dendooven; Josep F Oliver; Ikechi Ozoemelam; Jorge Roser; Gabriela Llosá
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Towards machine learning aided real-time range imaging in proton therapy.

Authors:  Jorge Lerendegui-Marco; Javier Balibrea-Correa; Víctor Babiano-Suárez; Ion Ladarescu; César Domingo-Pardo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Applications of Machine Learning to Improve the Clinical Viability of Compton Camera Based in vivo Range Verification in Proton Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Carlos A Barajas; Stephen W Peterson; Dennis S Mackin; Sam Beddar; Lei Ren; Matthias K Gobbert
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2022-04-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.