Literature DB >> 32314891

[Precise investigation of digital guide plates applied to implant surgery of anterior teeth].

Fang-Zhi Lou1, Mao-Rui Zhang1, Peng-Cheng Rao2, Shi-Hong Luo1, Meng-Ying Tang1, Jin-Gang Xiao3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the precision of digital guide plates applied to the implant surgery of anterior teeth.
METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled to receive implant restoration treatment in anterior teeth were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups (n=25, each group): those who were given routine implant restoration treatment (control group, 45 implants) and those who received implant restoration treatment using a digital guide plate (test group, 51 implants). After implantation, planned and placed implants were superimposed using digital software, and deviations (corona, apex, depth, degree) were analyzed. Esthetic parameters were assessed at 1 week (baseline), 6 month, and 1 year post final restoration. Pink esthetic (PES) and white esthetic (WES) scores were respectively used to evaluate the soft tissue and restoration esthetic outcome.
RESULTS: The deviation parameters in the test group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). PES and WES values recorded for the control group at 1 week, 6 month, and 1 year post final restoration were significantly lower than those in the test group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The digital guide plate can improve the accuracy of the three-dimensional position of implants in the maxillary esthetic zone. As such, this device may play an important role in obtaining the ideal aesthetic effects of maxillary anterior teeth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior teeth; digital guide plate; implant restoration; pink esthetic score; precision; white esthetic score

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32314891      PMCID: PMC7184289          DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2020.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi        ISSN: 1000-1182


  22 in total

Review 1.  Implant plastic surgery: a review and rationale.

Authors:  Christopher E Kazor; Khalaf Al-Shammari; David P Sarment; Carl E Misch; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Flapless and traditional dental implant surgery: an open, retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Paul Rousseau
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 3.  Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance.

Authors:  Michael S Block; Robert W Emery
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score.

Authors:  Rudolf Fürhauser; Dionisie Florescu; Thomas Benesch; Robert Haas; Georg Mailath; Georg Watzek
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Reliability of a CAD/CAM Surgical Guide for Implant Placement: An In Vitro Comparison of Surgeons' Experience Levels and Implant Sites.

Authors:  Su-Jung Park; Richard Leesungbok; Taixing Cui; Suk Won Lee; Su-Jin Ahn
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

Review 6.  [Accuracy of computer-guided implant placement and influencing factors].

Authors:  Li Jinmeng; Ou Guomin
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-02-01

7.  Labial bone thickness in area of anterior maxillary implants associated with crestal labial soft tissue thickness.

Authors:  Bach T Le; Ali Borzabadi-Farahani
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.454

8.  Analysis of soft tissue display during enjoyment smiling: part 1--Caucasians.

Authors:  Xiulian Hu; Susanne Nahles; Carolyn A Nelson; Ye Lin; Katja Nelson
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sarra E Cushen; Ilser Turkyilmaz
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.

Authors:  Oguz Ozan; Ilser Turkyilmaz; Ahmet Ersan Ersoy; Edwin A McGlumphy; Stephen F Rosenstiel
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.