| Literature DB >> 26452429 |
Michael S Block1, Robert W Emery2.
Abstract
The purpose of the present report is to contrast and compare 2 methods of dental implant placement. One method uses computed tomography data for computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to generate static guides for implant placement. The second method is a dynamic navigation system that uses a stereo vision computer triangulation setup to guide implant placement. A review of the published data was performed to provide evidence-based material to compare each method. Finally, the indications for each type of method are discussed.Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26452429 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg ISSN: 0278-2391 Impact factor: 1.895