Literature DB >> 26452429

Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance.

Michael S Block1, Robert W Emery2.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present report is to contrast and compare 2 methods of dental implant placement. One method uses computed tomography data for computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to generate static guides for implant placement. The second method is a dynamic navigation system that uses a stereo vision computer triangulation setup to guide implant placement. A review of the published data was performed to provide evidence-based material to compare each method. Finally, the indications for each type of method are discussed.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26452429     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  21 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adrià Jorba-García; Albert González-Barnadas; Octavi Camps-Font; Rui Figueiredo; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  [Research advances in the use of digital surgical guides in implantology].

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Wang; Ai-Peng Liu; Wen-Zheng Deng
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

3.  [Precise investigation of digital guide plates applied to implant surgery of anterior teeth].

Authors:  Fang-Zhi Lou; Mao-Rui Zhang; Peng-Cheng Rao; Shi-Hong Luo; Meng-Ying Tang; Jin-Gang Xiao
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-04-01

4.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of novel digital workflow and dynamic navigation for single-implant immediate loading in aesthetic zone: 1-year prospective case series.

Authors:  Alessandro Pozzi; Lorenzo Arcuri; Paolo Carosi; Alessandra Nardi; Joseph Kan
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.021

5.  Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation in Implant Placement with a Fully Digital Approach: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Cornelia Edelmann; Martin Wetzel; Anne Knipper; Ralph G Luthardt; Sigmar Schnutenhaus
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Augmented reality for dental implantology: a pilot clinical report of two cases.

Authors:  Gerardo Pellegrino; Carlo Mangano; Roberto Mangano; Agnese Ferri; Valerio Taraschi; Claudio Marchetti
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 7.  Innovative Trends in Implant Dentistry Training and Education: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ana Santos Ferro; Ken Nicholson; Sreenivas Koka
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  The Workflow of a New Dynamic Navigation System for the Insertion of Dental Implants in the Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaws: Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Armando Lopes; Miguel de Araújo Nobre; Diogo Santos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Indications for 3-D diagnostics and navigation in dental implantology with the focus on radiation exposure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Burkhard Kunzendorf; Hendrik Naujokat; Jörg Wiltfang
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-05-27

10.  A Novel Guided Zygomatic and Pterygoid Implant Surgery System: A Human Cadaver Study on Accuracy.

Authors:  Francesco Grecchi; Luigi V Stefanelli; Fabrizio Grivetto; Emma Grecchi; Rami Siev; Ziv Mazor; Massimo Del Fabbro; Nicola Pranno; Alessio Franchina; Vittorio Di Lucia; Francesca De Angelis; Funda Goker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.