Literature DB >> 32313011

Perturbing proteomes at single residue resolution using base editing.

Philippe C Després1,2,3,4, Alexandre K Dubé1,2,3,4,5, Motoaki Seki6, Nozomu Yachie7,8,9, Christian R Landry10,11,12,13,14.   

Abstract

Base editors derived from CRISPR-Cas9 systems and DNA editing enzymes offer an unprecedented opportunity for the precise modification of genes, but have yet to be used at a genome-scale throughput. Here, we test the ability of the Target-AID base editor to systematically modify genes genome-wide by targeting yeast essential genes. We mutate around 17,000 individual sites in parallel across more than 1500 genes. We identify over 700 sites at which mutations have a significant impact on fitness. Using previously determined and preferred Target-AID mutational outcomes, we find that gRNAs with significant effects on fitness are enriched in variants predicted to be deleterious based on residue conservation and predicted protein destabilization. We identify key features influencing effective gRNAs in the context of base editing. Our results show that base editing is a powerful tool to identify key amino acid residues at the scale of proteomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32313011      PMCID: PMC7170841          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15796-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  53 in total

1.  Genome-scale engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with single-nucleotide precision.

Authors:  Zehua Bao; Mohammad HamediRad; Pu Xue; Han Xiao; Ipek Tasan; Ran Chao; Jing Liang; Huimin Zhao
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells.

Authors:  Ophir Shalem; Neville E Sanjana; Ella Hartenian; Xi Shi; David A Scott; Tarjei Mikkelson; Dirk Heckl; Benjamin L Ebert; David E Root; John G Doench; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Quantitative Missense Variant Effect Prediction Using Large-Scale Mutagenesis Data.

Authors:  Vanessa E Gray; Ronald J Hause; Jens Luebeck; Jay Shendure; Douglas M Fowler
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 10.304

4.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis.

Authors:  E A Winzeler; D D Shoemaker; A Astromoff; H Liang; K Anderson; B Andre; R Bangham; R Benito; J D Boeke; H Bussey; A M Chu; C Connelly; K Davis; F Dietrich; S W Dow; M El Bakkoury; F Foury; S H Friend; E Gentalen; G Giaever; J H Hegemann; T Jones; M Laub; H Liao; N Liebundguth; D J Lockhart; A Lucau-Danila; M Lussier; N M'Rabet; P Menard; M Mittmann; C Pai; C Rebischung; J L Revuelta; L Riles; C J Roberts; P Ross-MacDonald; B Scherens; M Snyder; S Sookhai-Mahadeo; R K Storms; S Véronneau; M Voet; G Volckaert; T R Ward; R Wysocki; G S Yen; K Yu; K Zimmermann; P Philippsen; M Johnston; R W Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes.

Authors:  Jeffry D Sander; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression.

Authors:  Lei S Qi; Matthew H Larson; Luke A Gilbert; Jennifer A Doudna; Jonathan S Weissman; Adam P Arkin; Wendell A Lim
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.

Authors:  Guri Giaever; Angela M Chu; Li Ni; Carla Connelly; Linda Riles; Steeve Véronneau; Sally Dow; Ankuta Lucau-Danila; Keith Anderson; Bruno André; Adam P Arkin; Anna Astromoff; Mohamed El-Bakkoury; Rhonda Bangham; Rocio Benito; Sophie Brachat; Stefano Campanaro; Matt Curtiss; Karen Davis; Adam Deutschbauer; Karl-Dieter Entian; Patrick Flaherty; Francoise Foury; David J Garfinkel; Mark Gerstein; Deanna Gotte; Ulrich Güldener; Johannes H Hegemann; Svenja Hempel; Zelek Herman; Daniel F Jaramillo; Diane E Kelly; Steven L Kelly; Peter Kötter; Darlene LaBonte; David C Lamb; Ning Lan; Hong Liang; Hong Liao; Lucy Liu; Chuanyun Luo; Marc Lussier; Rong Mao; Patrice Menard; Siew Loon Ooi; Jose L Revuelta; Christopher J Roberts; Matthias Rose; Petra Ross-Macdonald; Bart Scherens; Greg Schimmack; Brenda Shafer; Daniel D Shoemaker; Sharon Sookhai-Mahadeo; Reginald K Storms; Jeffrey N Strathern; Giorgio Valle; Marleen Voet; Guido Volckaert; Ching-yun Wang; Teresa R Ward; Julie Wilhelmy; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Yonghong Yang; Grace Yen; Elaine Youngman; Kexin Yu; Howard Bussey; Jef D Boeke; Michael Snyder; Peter Philippsen; Ronald W Davis; Mark Johnston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Functional Genetic Variants Revealed by Massively Parallel Precise Genome Editing.

Authors:  Eilon Sharon; Shi-An A Chen; Neil M Khosla; Justin D Smith; Jonathan K Pritchard; Hunter B Fraser
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science.

Authors:  Douglas M Fowler; Stanley Fields
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Quantitative CRISPR interference screens in yeast identify chemical-genetic interactions and new rules for guide RNA design.

Authors:  Justin D Smith; Sundari Suresh; Ulrich Schlecht; Manhong Wu; Omar Wagih; Gary Peltz; Ronald W Davis; Lars M Steinmetz; Leopold Parts; Robert P St Onge
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors.

Authors:  Andrew V Anzalone; Luke W Koblan; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  High-Throughput Gene Mutagenesis Screening Using Base Editing.

Authors:  Philippe C Després; Alexandre K Dubé; Nozomu Yachie; Christian R Landry
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 3.  Recent advances in construction and regulation of yeast cell factories.

Authors:  Xue Jiao; Yuehao Gu; Pingping Zhou; Hongwei Yu; Lidan Ye
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Base editor scanning charts the DNMT3A activity landscape.

Authors:  Nicholas Z Lue; Emma M Garcia; Kevin C Ngan; Ceejay Lee; John G Doench; Brian B Liau
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 16.174

5.  Determinants of Base Editing Outcomes from Target Library Analysis and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Mandana Arbab; Max W Shen; Beverly Mok; Christopher Wilson; Żaneta Matuszek; Christopher A Cassa; David R Liu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Functional interrogation of DNA damage response variants with base editing screens.

Authors:  Raquel Cuella-Martin; Samuel B Hayward; Xiao Fan; Xiao Chen; Jen-Wei Huang; Angelo Taglialatela; Giuseppe Leuzzi; Junfei Zhao; Raul Rabadan; Chao Lu; Yufeng Shen; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair.

Authors:  Tarun S Nambiar; Lou Baudrier; Pierre Billon; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  CRISPR base editor screens identify variant function at scale.

Authors:  Phoebe C R Parrish; Alice H Berger
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 19.328

Review 9.  Base editing: advances and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Porto; Alexis C Komor; Ian M Slaymaker; Gene W Yeo
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 112.288

10.  Stress tolerance enhancement via SPT15 base editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Yuping Lin; Yanfang Liu; Yufeng Guo; Fengli Wu; Yuanyuan Zhang; Xianni Qi; Zhen Wang; Qinhong Wang
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.