Literature DB >> 32312145

Accuracy and repeatability of smartphone sensors for measuring shank-to-vertical angle.

Brandon T Nguyen1, Nick A Baicoianu1, Darrin B Howell1, Keshia M Peters1, Katherine M Steele1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessments of human movement are clinically important. However, accurate measurements are often unavailable due to the need for expensive equipment or intensive processing. For orthotists and therapists, shank-to-vertical angle is one critical measure used to assess gait and guide prescriptions. Smartphone-based sensors may provide a widely available platform to expand access to this measurement.
OBJECTIVES: Assess accuracy and repeatability of smartphone-based measurement of shank-to-vertical angle compared to marker-based 3D motion analysis. STUDY
DESIGN: Repeated-measures.
METHODS: Four licensed clinicians (two physical therapists and two orthotists) measured shank-to-vertical angle during gait with a smartphone attached to the anterior or lateral shank surface of unimpaired adults. We compared the shank-to-vertical angle calculated from the smartphone's inertial measurement unit to marker-based measurements. Each clinician completed three sessions/day on two days with each participant to assess repeatability.
RESULTS: Average absolute differences in shank-to-vertical angle measured with a smartphone versus marker-based 3D motion analysis during gait were 0.67 ± 0.25° and 4.89 ± 0.72°, with anterior or lateral smartphone positions, respectively. The inter- and intra-day repeatability of shank-to-vertical angle were within 2° for both smartphone positions.
CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone sensors can be used to measure shank-to-vertical angle with high accuracy and repeatability during unimpaired gait, providing a widely available tool for quantitative gait assessments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Smartphone sensors demonstrated high accuracy and repeatability for monitoring shank-to-vertical angle during gait. Measurement of shank-to-vertical angle from the front of the shank was more accurate than the side of the shank. Smartphones may expand access to quantitative assessments of gait.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthotics; clinical gait analysis; gait; gait analysis; inertial measurement unit; smartphone; wearable technology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32312145      PMCID: PMC8900712          DOI: 10.1177/0309364620911314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  45 in total

1.  Precision of shoulder anatomical landmark calibration by two approaches: a CAST-like protocol and a new anatomical palpator method.

Authors:  P Salvia; S Van Sint Jan; A Crouan; L Vanderkerken; F Moiseev; V Sholukha; C Mahieu; O Snoeck; M Rooze
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 2.  The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer L McGinley; Richard Baker; Rory Wolfe; Meg E Morris
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Reliability and concurrent validity of knee angle measurement: smart phone app versus universal goniometer used by experienced and novice clinicians.

Authors:  Steven Milanese; Susan Gordon; Petra Buettner; Carol Flavell; Sally Ruston; Damien Coe; William O'Sullivan; Steven McCormack
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-06-04

4.  Reliability and concurrent validity of a Smartphone, bubble inclinometer and motion analysis system for measurement of hip joint range of motion.

Authors:  Paula C Charlton; Benjamin F Mentiplay; Yong-Hao Pua; Ross A Clark
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.319

5.  Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait.

Authors:  M P Kadaba; H K Ramakrishnan; M E Wootten; J Gainey; G Gorton; G V Cochran
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Reliability of four models for clinical gait analysis.

Authors:  Hans Kainz; David Graham; Julie Edwards; Henry P J Walsh; Sheanna Maine; Roslyn N Boyd; David G Lloyd; Luca Modenese; Christopher P Carty
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Toward Accurate Clinical Spasticity Assessment: Validation of Movement Speed and Joint Angle Assessments Using Smartphones and Camera Tracking.

Authors:  Megan Banky; Ross A Clark; Benjamin F Mentiplay; John H Olver; Michelle B Kahn; Gavin Williams
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Concurrent validity and reliability of an iPhone app for the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion and inter-limb asymmetries.

Authors:  Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández; Natalia Romero-Franco; Pedro Jiménez-Reyes
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 3.337

9.  Statistical Parametric Mapping to Identify Differences between Consensus-Based Joint Patterns during Gait in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Angela Nieuwenhuys; Eirini Papageorgiou; Kaat Desloovere; Guy Molenaers; Tinne De Laet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Large-scale physical activity data reveal worldwide activity inequality.

Authors:  Tim Althoff; Rok Sosič; Jennifer L Hicks; Abby C King; Scott L Delp; Jure Leskovec
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  Smartphone Inclinometry Is a Valid and Reliable Tool for Measuring Frontal Plane Tibial Alignment in Healthy and Osteoarthritic Knees.

Authors:  Calvin T F Tse; Jesse M Charlton; Jennifer Lam; Joanne Ho; Jessica Bears; Amanda Serek; Michael A Hunt
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2021-07-01

2.  Assessment of the Shank-to-Vertical Angle While Changing Heel Heights Using a Single Inertial Measurement Unit in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Wearing an Ankle-Foot-Orthosis.

Authors:  Lysanne A F de Jong; Yvette L Kerkum; Tom de Groot; Marije Vos-van der Hulst; Ilse J W van Nes; Noel L W Keijsers
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.