Literature DB >> 18189448

Accurate vocal compensation for sound intensity loss with increasing distance in natural environments.

Pavel Zahorik1, Jonathan W Kelly.   

Abstract

Human abilities to adjust vocal output to compensate for intensity losses due to sound propagation over distance were investigated. Ten normally hearing adult participants were able to compensate for propagation losses ranging from -1.8 to -6.4 dBdoubling source distance over a range of distances from 1 to 8 m. The compensation was performed to within 1.2 dB of accuracy on average across all participants, distances, and propagation loss conditions with no practice or explicit training. These results suggest that natural vocal communication processes of humans may incorporate tacit knowledge of physical sound propagation properties more sophisticated than previously supposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18189448      PMCID: PMC3412342          DOI: 10.1121/1.2784148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Two memories for geographical slant: separation and interdependence of action and awareness.

Authors:  S H Creem; D R Proffitt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1998-03

2.  Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird, Taeniopygia guttata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Inhibiting the Lombard effect.

Authors:  H L Pick; G M Siegel; P W Fox; S R Garber; J K Kearney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory feedback in the regulation of voice.

Authors:  G M Siegel; H L Pick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of distance on vocal intensity.

Authors:  D D Michael; G M Siegel; H L Pick
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-10

6.  Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey.

Authors:  J M Sinnott; W C Stebbins; D B Moody
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Directivity of the human vocal source in the horizontal plane.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River Beluga.

Authors:  P M Scheifele; S Andrew; R A Cooper; M Darre; F E Musiek; L Max
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Regulation of parkinsonian speech volume: the effect of interlocuter distance.

Authors:  A K Ho; R Iansek; J L Bradshaw
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Effects of perceived listeners on speakers' vocal intensity.

Authors:  E C Healey; R Jones; R Berky
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.009

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Vowel and Sibilant Production in Noise: Effects of Noise Frequency and Phonological Similarity.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  Intensity-invariant coding in the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Sensorimotor Transformations Underlying Variability in Song Intensity during Drosophila Courtship.

Authors:  Philip Coen; Marjorie Xie; Jan Clemens; Mala Murthy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Brian C J Moore; Pavel Zahorik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Speech recognition in natural background noise.

Authors:  Julien Meyer; Laure Dentel; Fanny Meunier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.