| Literature DB >> 32283820 |
Sofien Fekih1,2,3, Mohamed Sami Zguira1,4, Abdessalem Koubaa1,5, Liwa Masmoudi3, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi6,7,8, Mohamed Jarraya3,9.
Abstract
The objective of the present study is to analyze the effects of motor mental imagery training on tennis service performance among tennis athletes who fast during Ramadan. Participants were 38 young male tennis players, randomly divided into two groups: Imaging Training (IMG, n = 18) and control group (CG, n = 20). The CG has watched videos on the history of the Olympic Games, while IMG has followed a training program in motor imagery. The performance of the tennis service was obtained by the product between accuracy and speed of typing (accuracy x average speed of all shots (km/h)). The effect of group / time interaction (p < 0.01) was identified for all performance indicators (accuracy, running speed and performance (speed x precision)), with improvement only in IMG (p = 0.01). The results showed that motor imagery training could be an effective strategy for mitigating/counteracting the negative effects of Ramadan on the tennis service performance.Entities:
Keywords: Ramadan fasting; intermittent fasting; motor mental imagery training; service performance; sport psychology; tennis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32283820 PMCID: PMC7231086 DOI: 10.3390/nu12041035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Mean and standard deviation of descriptive research variables.
| Variables | IMG | CG |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
|
| 16.9 ± 0.6 | 16.7 ± 0.8 | 0.34 |
|
| 67.4 ± 5.9 | 66.2 ± 9.3 | 0.32 |
|
| 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 0.36 |
|
| 5.4 ± 1.3 | 5.7 ± 1.2 | 0.28 |
|
| |||
|
| 5.4 ± 0.6 | 5.4 ± 0.8 | 0.36 |
|
| 5.3 ± 0.7 | 5.3 ± 0.6 | 0.38 |
Note. SD = standard deviation; MIQ-RS = Movement Imagery Questionnaire; VIM = visual motor imagery; KMI = kinesthetic motor imagery; IMG = imagery training group; CG = control group.
Averages (±SD) of daily calorie intake and percentages of carbohydrates, fats and proteins recorded before and during the month of Ramadan.
| Variables | Bef-R | Ramadan |
|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
|
| 3147 ± 141.3 | 3133 ± 182.2 |
|
| 50.4 ± 5.6 | 50.1 ± 3.8 |
|
| 32.1 ± 5.8 | 30.6 ± 3.8 |
|
| 19.9 ± 2.6 | 20.2 ± 3.8 |
Note. SD = standard deviation; Bef-R = before Ramadan.
Figure 1Experimental protocol adopted in the present study. Note. IMG = imagery training group; CG = control group; MIQ-RS = Motion Imagery Questionnaire.
Figure 2Service Performance Test (court scores).
Averages (±SD) of body mass and BMI recorded before and during Ramadan.
| Parameters | Groups | Bef-R | Beginning-R | Mid-R | End-R | Ramadan × Group Interaction | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F(3.108) |
| |||||||
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||||
|
|
| 66.2 ± 9.3 | 65.9 ± 8.7 | 64.2 ± 7.9 # | 63.8 ± 9.1 # | 5.99 | 0.017 | 0.08 |
|
| 67.4 ± 5.9 | 67.2 ± 5.2 | 65.3 ± 4.9 # | 65.1 ± 5.3 # | ||||
|
|
| 21.4 ± 4.7 | 21.3 ± 4.3 | 20.7 ± 3.9 # | 20.6 ± 4.6 # | 5.44 | 0.023 | 0.08 |
|
| 21.5 ± 3.6 | 21.4 ± 3.1 | 20.8 ± 3.3 # | 20.8 ± 3.0 # | ||||
Note. SD = standard deviation; IMG = imagery training group; CG = control group; BMI = body mass index; # Significantly different from Bef-R at p < 0.05.
Figure 3Mean and standard deviation of service accuracy, Before, During and at the end of Ramadan for both groups (CG vs. IMG). **, *** Significantly different from Contr-G at p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively. ## Significantly different from Bef-R at p < 0.001 respectively.
Figure 4Mean and standard deviation of the ball stroke speed, before, during and at the end of Ramadan for both groups (CG vs. IMG). # Significantly different from Bef-R at p < 0.001.
Figure 5Mean and standard deviation of service performance, before, during and at the end of Ramadan for CG vs. IMG. *, ** Significantly different from Contr-G at p < 0.01, p < 0.001 respectively; # significantly different from Bef-R at p < 0.001.