Literature DB >> 21775614

Muscle fatigue affects mental simulation of action.

Laurent Demougeot1, Charalambos Papaxanthis.   

Abstract

Several studies suggest that when subjects mentally rehearse or execute a familiar action, they engage similar neural and cognitive operations. Here, we examined whether muscle fatigue could influence mental movements. Participants mentally and actually performed a sequence of vertical arm movements (rotation around the shoulder joint) before and after a fatiguing exercise involving the right arm. We found similar durations for actual and mental movements before fatigue, but significant temporal discrepancies after fatigue. Specifically, mental simulation was accelerated immediately after fatigue, while the opposite was observed for actual execution. Furthermore, actual movements showed faster adaptation (i.e., return to prefatigue values) than mental movements. The EMG analysis showed that postfatigue participants programmed larger, compared to prefatigue, neural drives. Therefore, immediately after fatigue, the forward model received dramatically greater efferent copies and predicted faster, compared to prefatigue, arm movements. During actual movements, the discrepancy between estimated (forward model output) and actual state (sensory feedback) of the arm guided motor adaptation; i.e., durations returned rapidly to prefatigue values. Since during mental movements there is no sensory information and state estimation derives from the forward model alone, mental durations remained faster after fatigue and their adaptation was longer than those of actual movements. This effect was specific to the fatigued arm because actual and mental movements of the left nonfatigued arm were unaffected. The current results underline the interdependence of motor and cognitive states and suggest that mental actions integrate the current state of the motor system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21775614      PMCID: PMC6622640          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6032-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  20 in total

1.  Imagined actions in multiple sclerosis patients: evidence of decline in motor cognitive prediction.

Authors:  Andrea Tacchino; Marco Bove; Ludovico Pedullà; Mario Alberto Battaglia; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Giampaolo Brichetto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Manipulating visual-motor experience to probe for observation-induced after-effects in adaptation learning.

Authors:  Shannon B Lim; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Throwing in the dark: improved prediction of action outcomes following motor training without vision of the action.

Authors:  Desmond Mulligan; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-11-12

Review 4.  Impact of neurologic deficits on motor imagery: a systematic review of clinical evaluations.

Authors:  Franck Di Rienzo; Christian Collet; Nady Hoyek; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Franck Di Rienzo; Tadhg Macintyre; Aidan Moran; Christian Collet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Mental representation of arm motion dynamics in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Lionel Crognier; Xanthi Skoura; Annie Vinter; Charalambos Papaxanthis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Selective effect of physical fatigue on motor imagery accuracy.

Authors:  Franck Di Rienzo; Christian Collet; Nady Hoyek; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interhemispheric inhibition during mental actions of different complexity.

Authors:  Nicolas Gueugneau; Marco Bove; Laura Avanzino; Agnès Jacquin; Thierry Pozzo; Charalambos Papaxanthis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The relation between geometry and time in mental actions.

Authors:  Charalambos Papaxanthis; Christos Paizis; Olivier White; Thierry Pozzo; Natale Stucchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How we remember what we can do.

Authors:  Gunnar Declerck
Journal:  Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol       Date:  2015-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.