Literature DB >> 24931762

The effect of motor imagery with specific implement in expert badminton player.

Z Wang1, S Wang2, F-Y Shi3, Y Guan3, Y Wu4, L-L Zhang5, C Shen5, Y-W Zeng5, D-H Wang5, J Zhang6.   

Abstract

Motor skill can be improved with mental simulation. Implements are widely used in daily life and in various sports. However, it is unclear whether the utilization of implements enhances the effect of mental simulation. The present study was designed to investigate the different effects of motor imagery in athletes and novices when they handled a specific implement. We hypothesize that athletes have better motor imagery ability than novices when they hold a specific implement for the sport. This is manifested as higher motor cortical excitability in athletes than novices during motor imagery with the specific implement. Sixteen expert badminton players and 16 novices were compared when they held a specific implement such as a badminton racket and a non-specific implement such as a a plastic bar. Motor imagery ability was measured with a self-evaluation questionnaire. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to test the motor cortical excitability during motor imagery. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and extensor carpi radialis muscles were recorded. Athletes reported better motor imagery than novices when they held a specific implement. Athletes exhibited more MEP facilitation than novices in the FDI muscle with the specific implement applied during motor imagery. The MEP facilitation is correlated with motor imagery ability in athletes. We conclude that the effects of motor imagery with a specific implement are enhanced in athletes compared to novices and the difference between two groups is caused by long-term physical training of athletes with the specific implement.
Copyright © 2014 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  implement; motor imagery; motor-evoked potential; training; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24931762     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  15 in total

1.  The effect of somatosensory input on motor imagery depends upon motor imagery capability.

Authors:  Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Takahiro Yamagishi; Hiroki Nakata; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-12

2.  Morphological and Functional Differences between Athletes and Novices in Cortical Neuronal Networks.

Authors:  Xiao-Ying Tan; Yan-Ling Pi; Jue Wang; Xue-Pei Li; Lan-Lan Zhang; Wen Dai; Hua Zhu; Zhen Ni; Jian Zhang; Yin Wu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  EEG Spectral Generators Involved in Motor Imagery: A swLORETA Study.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Cebolla; Ernesto Palmero-Soler; Axelle Leroy; Guy Cheron
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-12

4.  Familiarity with a Tool Influences Peripersonal Space and Primary Motor Cortex Excitability of Muscles Involved in Haptic Contact.

Authors:  M Biggio; A Bisio; L Avanzino; P Ruggeri; M Bove
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-09-15

5.  Implementation of Motor Imagery during Specific Aerobic Training Session in Young Tennis Players.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Franck Di Rienzo; Vincent Pialoux; Germain Simon; Sarah Skinner; Isabelle Rogowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Long-Lasting Cortical Reorganization as the Result of Motor Imagery of Throwing a Ball in a Virtual Tennis Court.

Authors:  Ana M Cebolla; Mathieu Petieau; Carlos Cevallos; Axelle Leroy; Bernard Dan; Guy Cheron
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 7.  Online and Offline Performance Gains Following Motor Imagery Practice: A Comprehensive Review of Behavioral and Neuroimaging Studies.

Authors:  Franck Di Rienzo; Ursula Debarnot; Sébastien Daligault; Elodie Saruco; Claude Delpuech; Julien Doyon; Christian Collet; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The Study of Object-Oriented Motor Imagery Based on EEG Suppression.

Authors:  Lili Li; Jing Wang; Guanghua Xu; Min Li; Jun Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Motor experience with a sport-specific implement affects motor imagery.

Authors:  Lanlan Zhang; Yanling Pi; Hua Zhu; Cheng Shen; Jian Zhang; Yin Wu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Effects of Motor Mental Imagery Training on Tennis Service Performance during the Ramadan Fasting: a Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sofien Fekih; Mohamed Sami Zguira; Abdessalem Koubaa; Liwa Masmoudi; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Mohamed Jarraya
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.