| Literature DB >> 33137868 |
Sofien Fekih1,2,3, Mohamed Sami Zguira1,4, Abdessalem Koubaa1,5, Imed Ghariani6, Hamdi Zguira1,4, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi7,8,9, Mohamed Jarraya3,10.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to explore whether a training program incorporating motor imagery could have an effect on physical performance outcomes in terms of agility, speed, and reaction time in a sample of tennis athletes who fasted during the month of Ramadan. Recruited subjects were 27 young male tennis players, randomly allocated to two groups: the imaging training group (n = 13) and a control group (n = 14). The study was designed as a randomized, controlled experimental study. The control group was engaged in watching videos concerning the history of the Olympic Games, whereas the motor imagery group followed a motor imagery-based training program. Physical performance outcomes were assessed during four sessions (one before Ramadan and three during Ramadan) by means of field tests. Our results revealed a drop in all performance outcomes measured in the middle and at the end of Ramadan for both groups (p < 0.01). The effect of the group × time interaction (p < 0.01) was reported for all physical performance outcomes measured for the two groups. This drop in performance was greater for the control group compared to the motor imagery group in the middle and at the end of Ramadan. This study showed that fasting during Ramadan reduced agility, speed, and reaction time performance for tennis players. A motor imagery-based training program could be an effective approach to reduce the effect of fasting during Ramadan and stabilize physical performance outcomes in terms of agility, speed, and reaction time for male tennis players.Entities:
Keywords: Ramadan fasting; agility; motor imagery-based training program; performance; reaction time; speed; sport psychology
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33137868 PMCID: PMC7692860 DOI: 10.3390/nu12113306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Descriptive statistics of the recruited sample.
| Variables | Imagery Training Group | Control Group |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
| Age (years) | 16.9 ± 0.64 | 16.7 ± 0.59 | 0.41 |
| Body mass (kg) | 67.5 ± 2.96 | 66.12 ± 6.83 | 0.50 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.02 ± 0.58 | 21.73 ± 0.87 | 0.31 |
| Height (m) | 1.75 ± 0.04 | 1.74 ± 0.06 | 0.70 |
| Number of years of training | 5.4 ± 1.2 | 5.7 ± 1.18 | 0.48 |
| MIQ-RS | |||
| VMI | 5.2 ± 0.5 | - | - |
| KMI | 5.4 ± 0.4 | - | - |
Note. SD = standard deviation; BMI = body mass index; MIQ-RS = The Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised Second edition version; VMI = visual motor imagery; KMI = kinesthetic motor imagery.
Figure 1Experimental protocol adopted in the present study. Note. IMG = imagery training group; CG = control group; MIQ-RS = The Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised Second edition version.
Averages (±SD) of daily calorie intake and percentages of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins recorded before and at the end of Ramadan.
| Variables | Before Ramadan | End of Ramadan |
|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
| Calorie intake (kcal/day) | 2956 ± 133.4 | 2947.0 ± 154.3 |
| Protein (%) | 18.7 ± 2.8 | 19.2 ± 2.2 |
| Lipids (%) | 31.2 ± 3.9 | 30.5 ± 4.1 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | 52.3 ± 5.1 | 52.1 ± 4.6 |
Note. SD = standard deviation.
Figure 2Reaction speed test following visual perception.
Averages (±SD) of body mass and body mass index (BMI) recorded before and during Ramadan.
| Parameters | Groups | Before Ramadan | Beginning of Ramadan | Middle of Ramadan | End of Ramadan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
| Body mass (kg) | Control group | 66.12 ± 6.83 | 65.67 ± 6.88 | 65.35 ± 6.86 * | 64.94 ± 6.89 * |
| Imagery training group | 67.52 ± 2.96 | 67.16 ± 2.85 | 66.82 ± 2.83 * | 66.45 ± 2.87 * | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | Control group | 21.73 ± 0.87 | 21.58 ± 0.94 | 21.47 ± 0.93 * | 21.33 ± 0.94 * |
| Imagery training group | 22.02 ± 0.58 | 21.91 ± 0.59 | 21.80 ± 0.57 * | 21.68 ± 0.57 * |
Note. SD = standard deviation; * Significantly different from before Ramadan at p < 0.001.
Figure 3Means and standard deviations of the MAT-Agility test scores, before, at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of Ramadan for the two groups (control group, CG, versus experimental group, imagery training group or IMG). CG = control group, IMG = imagery training group. ##, # Significantly different from the control group at p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively. ** Significantly different from before Ramadan at p < 0.001.
Figure 4Means and standard deviations of the ZIG-ZAG test scores, before, at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of Ramadan for the two groups (control group, CG, versus experimental group, imagery training group or IMG). CG = control group, IMG = imagery training group. ## Significantly different from the control group at p < 0.001. ** Significantly different from before Ramadan at p < 0.001.
Figure 5Means and standard deviations of the reaction time, before, at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of Ramadan for the two groups (control group, CG, versus experimental group, imagery training group or IMG). CG = control group, IMG = imagery training group. ## Significantly different from the control group at p < 0.001. **, * Significantly different from before Ramadan at p <0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively.