| Literature DB >> 32283708 |
Emilio Clarke-Crespo1,2, Claudia N Moreno-Arzate3, Carlos A López-González2.
Abstract
Ticks are vectors of a large number of pathogens of medical and veterinary importance, and in recent years, they have participated in the rise of multiple infectious outbreaks around the world. Studies have proposed that temperature and precipitation are the main variables that limit the geographical distribution of ticks. The analysis of environmental constraints with ecological niche modeling (ENM) techniques can improve our ability to identify suitable areas for emergence events. Algorithms used in this study showed different distributional patterns for each tick genera; the environmental suitability for Amblyomma includes warm and humid localities below 1000 m above the sea level, while Ixodes is mainly associated with ecosystems with high vegetation cover. Dermacentor and Rhipicephalus genus presented wider distribution patterns; the first includes species that are well adapted to resist desiccation, whereas the latter includes generalist species that are mostly associated with domestic hosts in Mexico. Ecological niche models have proven to be useful in estimating the geographic distribution of many taxa of ticks. Despite our limited knowledge of tick's diversity, ENM can improve our understanding of the dynamics of vector-borne diseases and can assist public health decision-making processes.Entities:
Keywords: Amblyomma; Dermacentor; Ixodes; Rhipicephalus; ecological niche modelling
Year: 2020 PMID: 32283708 PMCID: PMC7222792 DOI: 10.3390/ani10040649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Climatic and environmental variables used for the generation of ecological niche models of the four tick genera.
| Genera |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Annual mean temperature | • | |
| Mean diurnal range | • | • |
| Temperature Seasonality | • | |
| Max temperature of warmest month | • | |
| Min temperature of coldest month | • | |
| Mean temperature of wettest quarter | • | |
| Annual precipitation | • | • |
| Precipitation of driest month | • | • |
| Precipitation seasonality | • | • |
| Precipitation of wettest quarter | • | |
| Precipitation of the warmest quarter | • | |
| Type of soil | • | • |
| Type of land use and vegetation | • | • |
Figure 1Records used to estimate the ecological niche models for the four tick genera: Black circles indicate the presence of Rhipicephalus spp., red triangles indicate the presence of Ixodes spp., and green and blue boxes show the presence of Dermacentor spp. and Amblyomma spp., respectively.
Area under the curve index (AUC) values for each of the models generated by tick genus.
| Algorithm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIOCLIM | 0.706 | 0.664 | 0.669 | 0.772 |
| BRT | 0.905 | 0.872 | 0.892 | 0.921 |
| CART | 0.913 | 0.856 | 0.883 | 0.965 |
| MDA | 0.883 | 0.797 | 0.789 | 0.869 |
| GAM | 0.93 | 0.871 | 0.962 | 0.98 |
| GLM | 0.888 | 0.804 | 0.792 | 0.878 |
| MARS | 0.92 | 0.941 | 0.947 | 0.962 |
| MAXENT | 0.901 | 0.840 | 0.918 | 0.931 |
| RF | 0.999 | 0.996 | 0.994 | 0.999 |
BRT: Boosted Regression Trees, CART: Classification And Regression Tree, MDA: Mixture Discriminant Analysis, GAM: Generalized Additive Models, GLM: Generalized Linear Models; MARS: Multivariate adaptive regression spline, Maxent: Maximum entropy, RF: Random Forest
Figure 2Assembly that brings together the estimated potential distribution of the four tick genera considering the nine algorithms: The darkest areas indicate agreement of the prediction of habitat suitability for each tick genus. The values indicate the number of methods that coincided in determining a certain site as suitable for each genus of tick.