| Literature DB >> 19333367 |
Alexander Moffett1, Stavana Strutz, Nelson Guda, Camila González, Maria Cristina Ferro, Víctor Sánchez-Cordero, Sahotra Sarkar.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19333367 PMCID: PMC2656641 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000378
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Summary of the current contents of the Disease Vector Database.
| Disease | Vectors | Reservoirs | ||||
| Species | Records | Minimum/Maximum Records per Species | Species | Records | Minimum/Maximum Records per Species | |
| Chagas disease | 62 | 567 | 1/159 | 45 | 7,492 | 3/1,353 |
| Dengue | 3 | 720 | 45/569 | — | — | — |
| Leishmaniasis | 15 | 415 | 1/102 | 9 | 1,103 | 4/1,024 |
| Malaria | 93 | 5,400 | 1/1,265 | — | — | — |
Advantages and disadvantages of the Disease Vector Database.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
| • Central source of data for a variety of diseases, with collaborators continually uploading new data. | • Data may appear to be more precise than they actually are, with limitations not being explicitly realized. |
| • Provides georeferenced data that can be used for ecological niche modeling and to produce risk maps. | • Data from different sources may have different levels of reliability with nothing to indicate the problem explicitly. |
| • Data can be easily visualized. | • This Database does not contain disease incidence records or any information on human factors of disease risk. |
Figure 1The distribution of vector occurrence data currently contained in the Disease Vector Database.
Yellow, malaria vectors; green, dengue vectors; blue, Chagas reservoirs and vectors; red, leishmaniasis reservoirs and vectors.