Literature DB >> 19333367

A global public database of disease vector and reservoir distributions.

Alexander Moffett1, Stavana Strutz, Nelson Guda, Camila González, Maria Cristina Ferro, Víctor Sánchez-Cordero, Sahotra Sarkar.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19333367      PMCID: PMC2656641          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis        ISSN: 1935-2727


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

The Disease Vector Database is a global, free, public, Web-accessible resource presenting data on the geographical distribution of infectious disease vectors and reservoirs. At present, the Database contains records for dengue and malaria vectors and Chagas disease and leishmaniasis vectors and reservoirs. Future versions of the Database will include parasite data. These data can be used for a variety of purposes including the construction of ecological niche models and disease risk maps. The Database permits downloading data in formats designed to facilitate such use, for instance, as input files for popular niche modeling software packages such as Maxent and GARP.

Background

Vector-borne infectious diseases adversely affect the health of large numbers of people globally. Effective response to these diseases requires representations of risk, which often take the form of risk maps [1]–[3], with geographic estimates of risk based on distributions of parasite, vector, and reservoir species in addition to human population, social organization, and behavior. The feasibility of constructing risk maps has increased substantially in recent years due to the widespread availability of digital environmental layers, geographic information system (GIS) platforms, and advances in ecological niche modeling, which makes it possible to produce maps even with very few parasite, reservoir, and vector presence records [3]. Niche models have been used to predict the geographic distributions of Chagas disease and leishmaniasis vectors and reservoirs and dengue and malaria vectors 3–5. The construction of risk maps and other forms of spatial risk assessment require the availability of georeferenced parasite, vector, and reservoir records. Several groups have suggested the creation of public repositories of such spatial data [6],[7]. We have created the Disease Vector Database (http://www.diseasevectors.org), a global, free, publicly accessible Web-based database for disease vector and reservoir data. Future versions of the Database will include parasite data. At present, the Database has occurrence records for vector and reservoir species for Chagas disease and leishmaniasis, and vector species for dengue and malaria (Table 1). Researchers from around the world may submit data for inclusion in the Database following a submission protocol similar to that of GenBank [8].
Table 1

Summary of the current contents of the Disease Vector Database.

DiseaseVectorsReservoirs
SpeciesRecordsMinimum/Maximum Records per SpeciesSpeciesRecordsMinimum/Maximum Records per Species
Chagas disease625671/159457,4923/1,353
Dengue372045/569
Leishmaniasis154151/10291,1034/1,024
Malaria935,4001/1,265

Existing Databases

There are some existing databases for disease vectors, mainly for malaria. However, compared to the effort being reported here, each of these databases has some limitations (though some provide useful additional data beyond the scope of the Database described here). In 1996, the Mapping Malaria Risk in Africa (MARA) collaboration (http://www.mara.org.za/) began to provide a repository of information on malaria-transmission intensities in Africa [9]. Though the focus of the collaboration was on parasite data rather than on vector data, it currently contains 2,535 georeferenced records of malaria vectors. However, the records cover only the six members of the Anopheles gambiae complex, and there is no information from continents other than Africa. Koum and colleagues (2005) [10] created a database of malaria vectors with georeferenced information sampled from 19 African locations. However, the focus was on establishing the proper ontology for such a database and not on public use. The Walter Reed Army Institute and the Smithsonian Institution's MosquitoMap Web site (http://www.mosquitomap.org/) contains distributional information on mosquito species.

Database Coverage

Chagas disease, dengue, leishmaniasis, and malaria were selected for initial inclusion in our Database because of the epidemiologic importance of vector and reservoir control for the prevention of their transmission and the availability of data. For the Database, the vectors and reservoirs implicated in the four diseases were identified from reviews. There were three sources for the data. First, a number of the data points (for instance, ∼10% of the reservoir data and ∼75% of the leishmaniasis vector data) came from field records of collaborators collected over several decades. This will eventually be the most important source of new data. Second, the ISI Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar were searched using “distribution” along with the genus and name of each species. References from the publications identified on the basis of this search were also consulted for additional data. Third, records from public databases such as MANIS (for mammal reservoir data; http://manisnet.org/), MARA, and MosquitoMap were included. A record is included in the Database only if it meets the following criteria: (a) it represents a confirmed or suspected disease vector or reservoir; (b) it includes the species of the vector or reservoir; (c) it can be georeferenced to at least the nearest arc-minute. When available, additional information is included for the following: abundance, collection method, collector contact information, country, date, location, provenance, region, and voucher location. Each record has a unique accession number; information is maintained on the dates of initial inclusion and last modification. Data on the origin of the information are also retained. Records referenced only by names of study sites or by points on published maps were included only if they could be adequately georeferenced. The spatial data associated with these records may be less accurate than those for records with published coordinates: The Database records such uncertainties so that users can decide whether records are sufficiently precise for their needs. Table 2 discusses advantages and disadvantages of the Database.
Table 2

Advantages and disadvantages of the Disease Vector Database.

AdvantagesDisadvantages
• Central source of data for a variety of diseases, with collaborators continually uploading new data.• Data may appear to be more precise than they actually are, with limitations not being explicitly realized.
• Provides georeferenced data that can be used for ecological niche modeling and to produce risk maps.• Data from different sources may have different levels of reliability with nothing to indicate the problem explicitly.
• Data can be easily visualized.• This Database does not contain disease incidence records or any information on human factors of disease risk.

Potential Uses

The Web site enables the submission of data from an unlimited number of collaborators, who are then listed on the Web page. Data from the Disease Vector Database can be used in a variety of ways to help us understand the geographic risk of disease. Restricting attention to publicly available data, maps of occurrence records from the Database can be used to identify areas that need attention. For instance, the neotropics south of México in Central America have not been adequately sampled for Chagas disease vectors and reservoirs (see Figure 1). Data on potential leishmaniasis reservoirs are lacking from areas outside North America; data on vectors are incomplete except in Latin America. As additional existing data are incorporated into the Database, the geographic limitations will become less severe. Nevertheless, it is likely that there will remain significant areas with no data because they have not been surveyed. Compared to malaria and dengue, strikingly little data are publicly available for Chagas disease and leishmaniasis.
Figure 1

The distribution of vector occurrence data currently contained in the Disease Vector Database.

Yellow, malaria vectors; green, dengue vectors; blue, Chagas reservoirs and vectors; red, leishmaniasis reservoirs and vectors.

The distribution of vector occurrence data currently contained in the Disease Vector Database.

Yellow, malaria vectors; green, dengue vectors; blue, Chagas reservoirs and vectors; red, leishmaniasis reservoirs and vectors. The other most obvious use of such data is for ecological niche modeling. For malaria, this Database has already been used to predict continent-wide distribution maps for ten malaria vector species in Africa, with these maps then being used to produce relative risk maps [3]. The long-term goal of the Disease Vector Database is to include many more diseases. Success of the project will depend on active collaboration of researchers from around the world. The fact that this Database could be constructed already shows the extent to which free datasharing is becoming the norm rather than the exception in epidemiology and ecology. Success in extending the Database will depend on a continuation of this trend, and this note is intended to encourage further collaboration.
  9 in total

1.  Design and implementation of a mosquito database through an entomological ontology.

Authors:  Guillaume Koum; Augustin Yekel; Bengyella Ndifon; Frédéric Simard
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  An atlas of malaria in Africa.

Authors:  D Le Sueur; F Binka; C Lengeler; D De Savigny; B Snow; T Teuscher; Y Toure
Journal:  Afr Health       Date:  1997-01

3.  Integrated disease mapping in a polyparasitic world.

Authors:  Simon Brooker; Jürg Utzinger
Journal:  Geospat Health       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.212

4.  Time-specific ecological niche modeling predicts spatial dynamics of vector insects and human dengue cases.

Authors:  A Townsend Peterson; Carmen Martínez-Campos; Yoshinori Nakazawa; Enrique Martínez-Meyer
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.184

Review 5.  Ecologic niche modeling and spatial patterns of disease transmission.

Authors:  A Townsend Peterson
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  GenBank.

Authors:  Dennis A Benson; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; David J Lipman; James Ostell; David L Wheeler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The malaria Atlas Project: developing global maps of malaria risk.

Authors:  Simon I Hay; Robert W Snow
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Need for improved methods to collect and present spatial epidemiologic data for vectorborne diseases.

Authors:  Lars Eisen; Rebecca J Eisen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Malaria in Africa: vector species' niche models and relative risk maps.

Authors:  Alexander Moffett; Nancy Shackelford; Sahotra Sarkar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  19 in total

1.  An integrated database on ticks and tick-borne zoonoses in the tropics and subtropics with special reference to developing and emerging countries.

Authors:  Umberto Vesco; Nataša Knap; Marcelo B Labruna; Tatjana Avšič-Županc; Agustín Estrada-Peña; Alberto A Guglielmone; Gervasio H Bechara; Arona Gueye; Andras Lakos; Anna Grindatto; Valeria Conte; Daniele De Meneghi
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 2.  Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas' Disease in the United States.

Authors:  Caryn Bern; Sonia Kjos; Michael J Yabsley; Susan P Montgomery
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Distribution of the main malaria vectors in Kenya.

Authors:  Robi M Okara; Marianne E Sinka; Noboru Minakawa; Charles M Mbogo; Simon I Hay; Robert W Snow
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 4.  Developing global maps of the dominant anopheles vectors of human malaria.

Authors:  Simon I Hay; Marianne E Sinka; Robi M Okara; Caroline W Kabaria; Philip M Mbithi; Carolynn C Tago; David Benz; Peter W Gething; Rosalind E Howes; Anand P Patil; William H Temperley; Michael J Bangs; Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap; Iqbal R F Elyazar; Ralph E Harbach; Janet Hemingway; Sylvie Manguin; Charles M Mbogo; Yasmin Rubio-Palis; H Charles J Godfray
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Chagas disease risk in Texas.

Authors:  Sahotra Sarkar; Stavana E Strutz; David M Frank; Chissa-Louise Rivaldi; Blake Sissel; Victor Sánchez-Cordero
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-10-05

6.  Web-based GIS: the vector-borne disease airline importation risk (VBD-AIR) tool.

Authors:  Zhuojie Huang; Anirrudha Das; Youliang Qiu; Andrew J Tatem
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.918

7.  Species distribution models and ecological suitability analysis for potential tick vectors of lyme disease in Mexico.

Authors:  Patricia Illoldi-Rangel; Chissa-Louise Rivaldi; Blake Sissel; Rebecca Trout Fryxell; Guadalupe Gordillo-Pérez; Angel Rodríguez-Moreno; Phillip Williamson; Griselda Montiel-Parra; Víctor Sánchez-Cordero; Sahotra Sarkar
Journal:  J Trop Med       Date:  2012-02-14

8.  Climate change and risk of leishmaniasis in north america: predictions from ecological niche models of vector and reservoir species.

Authors:  Camila González; Ophelia Wang; Stavana E Strutz; Constantino González-Salazar; Víctor Sánchez-Cordero; Sahotra Sarkar
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-01-19

9.  Epidemiology of malaria in endemic areas.

Authors:  Beatrice Autino; Alice Noris; Rosario Russo; Francesco Castelli
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.576

10.  The notes from nature tool for unlocking biodiversity records from museum records through citizen science.

Authors:  Andrew Hill; Robert Guralnick; Arfon Smith; Andrew Sallans; Michael Denslow; Joyce Gross; Zack Murrell; Peter Oboyski; Joan Ball; Andrea Thomer; Robert Prys-Jones; Javier de Torre; Patrick Kociolek; Lucy Fortson
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 1.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.