| Literature DB >> 32273559 |
Wouter Van Genechten1,2,3, Liesbeth Demuyser1,2, Peter Dedecker4, Patrick Van Dijck5,6.
Abstract
Fluorescent proteins with varying colors are indispensable tools for the life sciences research community. These fluorophores are often developed for use in mammalian systems, with incremental enhancements or new versions published frequently. However, the successful application of these labels in other organisms in the tree of life, such as the fungus Candida albicans, can be difficult to achieve due to the difficulty in engineering constructs for good expression in these organisms. In this contribution, we present a palette of Candida-optimized fluorescent proteins ranging from cyan to red and assess their application potential. We also compare a range of reported expression optimization techniques, and find that none of these strategies is generally applicable, and that even very closely related proteins require the application of different strategies to achieve good expression. In addition to reporting new fluorescent protein variants for applications in Candida albicans, our work highlights the ongoing challenges in optimizing protein expression in heterologous systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32273559 PMCID: PMC7145796 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63308-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Fluorescence intensity measurements using a BD influx flow cytometer on C. albicans strains expressing different codon optimized versions of fluorescent proteins. Cells were grown overnight on low fluorescent medium, before bringing to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.2 in fresh Low Fluorescent medium and grown to the exponential phase (4–5 hrs) before measurement. Data shown is corrected for wild type autofluorescence and normalized to the brightest codon variant. A) γmGFP B) mScarlet-I C) mTurquoise2 D) ffDronpa E) YemVenus. Asterisks denote significance level with **** corresponding to p < 0,0001 and ** corresponding to p < 0,01 when comparing with the brightest codon variant.
Figure 2Images were taken with a Fluoview 1000 confocal microscope, using the appropriate excitation and emission filters for each fluorescent protein. Cells were grown overnight on low fluorescent medium, before bringing to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.2 in fresh Low Fluorescent medium and grown to the exponential phase (4–5 hrs) before measurement. For each codon variant one representative strain is represented. Laser intensity is kept constant between codon variants of the same fluorescent protein and also between γmGFP and ffDronpa.
Figure 3Fluorescence intensity measurements using a BD influx flow cytometer on C. albicans strains endogenously expressing (A) CFP or mTurquoise2 attached to Tpk1 and (C) mCherry or mScarlet-I attached to Tub1. Cells were grown overnight on low fluorescent medium and brought to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.2 in fresh Low Fluorescent medium. Strains were allowed to grow to the exponential phase (4–5 hrs) at 30 °C or 37 °C, before measurement. Data shown is corrected for wild type autofluorescence. Asterisks denote significance level with ***corresponding to p < 0,001. B and D are confocal images taken with a Fluoview 1000 confocal microscope, using the appropriate excitation and emission filters for each fluorescent protein. Shown are representative images of Tpk1 – CFP and Tpk1 – mTurquoise2 (mT2) in panel B and representative images of Tub1 – mCherry and Tub1 – mScarlet-I in panel D.
Figure 4Scatter plot of the fluorescence intensity as measured using FACS versus (A) the folding energy of the structure from the full length (▲) and first 250nt (●) of the mRNA sequence as calculated using RNAfold. Colors denote different fluorescent proteins with orange for YemVenus, blue for mTurquoise2, Light green for ffDronpa and dark green for γmGFP.