Literature DB >> 8844849

Ribosome-mediated translational pause and protein domain organization.

T A Thanaraj1, P Argos.   

Abstract

Because regions on the messenger ribonucleic acid differ in the rate at which they are translated by the ribosome and because proteins can fold cotranslationally on the ribosome, a question arises as to whether the kinetics of translation influence the folding events in the growing nascent polypeptide chain. Translationally slow regions were identified on mRNAs for a set of 37 multidomain proteins from Escherichia coli with known three-dimensional structures. The frequencies of individual codons in mRNAs of highly expressed genes from E. coli were taken as a measure of codon translation speed. Analysis of codon usage in slow regions showed a consistency with the experimentally determined translation rates of codons; abundant codons that are translated with faster speeds compared with their synonymous codons were found to be avoided; rare codons that are translated at an unexpectedly higher rate were also found to be avoided in slow regions. The statistical significance of the occurrence of such slow regions on mRNA spans corresponding to the oligopeptide domain termini and linking regions on the encoded proteins was assessed. The amino acid type and the solvent accessibility of the residues coded by such slow regions were also examined. The results indicated that protein domain boundaries that mark higher-order structural organization are largely coded by translationally slow regions on the RNA and are composed of such amino acids that are stickier to the ribosome channel through which the synthesized polypeptide chain emerges into the cytoplasm. The translationally slow nucleotide regions on mRNA possess the potential to form hairpin secondary structures and such structures could further slow the movement of ribosome. The results point to an intriguing correlation between protein synthesis machinery and in vivo protein folding. Examination of available mutagenic data indicated that the effects of some of the reported mutations were consistent with our hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8844849      PMCID: PMC2143486          DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560050814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  103 in total

Review 1.  Programmed translational frameshifting.

Authors:  P J Farabaugh
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1996-03

2.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 3.  Translational initiation in prokaryotes.

Authors:  L Gold; D Pribnow; T Schneider; S Shinedling; B S Singer; G Stormo
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 15.500

4.  Codon usage and transfer RNA contents: organism-specific codon-choice patterns in reference to the isoacceptor contents.

Authors:  T Ikemura; H Ozeki
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1983

5.  The codon preference plot: graphic analysis of protein coding sequences and prediction of gene expression.

Authors:  M Gribskov; J Devereux; R R Burgess
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-01-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity.

Authors:  M Gouy; C Gautier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Contextual constraints on synonymous codon choice.

Authors:  D J Lipman; W J Wilbur
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-01-25       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Codon preference and its use in identifying protein coding regions in long DNA sequences.

Authors:  R Staden; A D McLachlan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-01-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Different exported proteins in E. coli show differences in the temporal mode of processing in vivo.

Authors:  L G Josefsson; L L Randall
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system.

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1981-09-25       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  104 in total

1.  Expression of the Staphylococcus hyicus lipase in Lactococcus lactis.

Authors:  S Drouault; G Corthier; S D Ehrlich; P Renault
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Large-scale analysis of conserved rare codon clusters suggests an involvement in co-translational molecular recognition events.

Authors:  Matthieu Chartier; Francis Gaudreault; Rafael Najmanovich
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Effect of codon message on xylanase thermal activity.

Authors:  Liangwei Liu; Linmin Wang; Zhang Zhang; Suya Wang; Hongge Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Detecting positive and purifying selection at synonymous sites in yeast and worm.

Authors:  Tong Zhou; Wanjun Gu; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Whisper mutations: cryptic messages within the genetic code.

Authors:  R Fåhraeus; M Marin; V Olivares-Illana
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Predicted highly expressed genes in archaeal genomes.

Authors:  Samuel Karlin; Jan Mrázek; Jiong Ma; Luciano Brocchieri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Ribosome kinetics and aa-tRNA competition determine rate and fidelity of peptide synthesis.

Authors:  Aaron Fluitt; Elsje Pienaar; Hendrik Viljoen
Journal:  Comput Biol Chem       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Translationally optimal codons associate with structurally sensitive sites in proteins.

Authors:  Tong Zhou; Mason Weems; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 9.  You're one in a googol: optimizing genes for protein expression.

Authors:  Mark Welch; Alan Villalobos; Claes Gustafsson; Jeremy Minshull
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Antagonistic signals within the COX2 mRNA coding sequence control its translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Williams; Thomas D Fox
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.