Literature DB >> 32267728

Determining patient abdomen thickness from a single digital radiograph with a computational model: clinical results from a proof of concept study.

Mark Worrall1, Sarah Vinnicombe2,3, David Sutton1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A computational model has been created to estimate the abdominal thickness of a patient following an X-ray examination; its intended application is assisting with patient dose audit of paediatric X-ray examinations. This work evaluates the accuracy of the computational model in a clinical setting for adult patients undergoing anteroposterior (AP) abdomen X-ray examinations.
METHODS: The model estimates patient thickness using the radiographic image, the exposure factors with which the image was acquired, a priori knowledge of the characteristics of the X-ray unit and detector and the results of extensive Monte Carlo simulation of patient examinations. For 20 patients undergoing AP abdominal X-ray examinations, the model was used to estimate the patient thickness; these estimates were compared against a direct measurement made at the time of the examination.
RESULTS: Estimates of patient thickness made using the model were on average within ±5.8% of the measured thickness.
CONCLUSION: The model can be used to accurately estimate the thickness of a patient undergoing an AP abdominal X-ray examination where the patient's size falls within the range of the size of patients used to create the computational model. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This work demonstrates that it is possible to accurately estimate the AP abdominal thickness of an adult patient using the digital X-ray image and a computational model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32267728      PMCID: PMC7336075          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  8 in total

1.  Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version.

Authors:  I Kawrakow
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index.

Authors:  D Gallagher; S B Heymsfield; M Heo; S A Jebb; P R Murgatroyd; Y Sakamoto
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units.

Authors:  D W Rogers; B A Faddegon; G X Ding; C M Ma; J We; T R Mackie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  VALIDATION OF A BEAMNRC MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF A BROAD BEAM DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY UNIT.

Authors:  Mark Worrall; David G Sutton
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging.

Authors:  E Vañó; D L Miller; C J Martin; M M Rehani; K Kang; M Rosenstein; P Ortiz-López; S Mattsson; R Padovani; A Rogers
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2017-10

6.  Determining paediatric patient thickness from a single digital radiograph-a proof of principle.

Authors:  Mark Worrall; Sarah Vinnicombe; David G Sutton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Overweight and obesity trends from 1974 to 2003 in English children: what is the role of socioeconomic factors?

Authors:  E Stamatakis; P Primatesta; S Chinn; R Rona; E Falascheti
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.