Literature DB >> 3226152

Assessment of biological age by principal component analysis.

E Nakamura1, K Miyao, T Ozeki.   

Abstract

A method of assessing biological age by the application of principal component analysis is reported. Healthy individuals (462) randomly selected from about 6000 men who had taken a 2-day health examination were studied. Out of the 30 physiological variables examined in routine check-ups, 11 variables were selected as suitable for the assessment of biological age based on the results of factor analysis and the physiological meaning of each test. This variable set was then submitted to principal component analysis, and the 1st principal component obtained from this analysis was used as an equation for assessing one's biological age. However, the biological age calculated from this equation is expressed as a score, so the estimated score was transformed to years (biological age) using the T-score idea. The biological age estimated by this method is practically useful and theoretically valid in contrast with the multiple regression model, because this approach eliminates and overcomes the following 2 big problems of the multiple regression model: (1) the distortion of the individual biological age at the regression edges; and (2) a theoretical contradiction in that a perfect model will merely be predicting the subject's chronological age, not his biological age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3226152     DOI: 10.1016/0047-6374(88)90109-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev        ISSN: 0047-6374            Impact factor:   5.432


  16 in total

1.  Select aging biomarkers based on telomere length and chronological age to build a biological age equation.

Authors:  Wei-Guang Zhang; Shu-Ying Zhu; Xiao-Juan Bai; De-Long Zhao; Shi-Min Jian; Juan Li; Zuo-Xiang Li; Bo Fu; Guang-Yan Cai; Xue-Feng Sun; Xiang-Mei Chen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2014-06

2.  Model Construction for Biological Age Based on a Cross-Sectional Study of a Healthy Chinese Han population.

Authors:  W Zhang; L Jia; G Cai; F Shao; H Lin; Z Liu; F Liu; D Zhao; Z Li; X Bai; Z Feng; X Sun; X Chen
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Effects of habitual physical exercise on physiological age in men aged 20-85 years as estimated using principal component analysis.

Authors:  E Nakamura; T Moritani; A Kanetaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

4.  Modeling the rate of senescence: can estimated biological age predict mortality more accurately than chronological age?

Authors:  Morgan E Levine
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Inferring Multidimensional Rates of Aging from Cross-Sectional Data.

Authors:  Emma Pierson; Pang Wei Koh; Tatsunori Hashimoto; Daphne Koller; Jure Leskovec; Nicholas Eriksson; Percy Liang
Journal:  Proc Mach Learn Res       Date:  2019-04

6.  Biological age versus physical fitness age.

Authors:  E Nakamura; T Moritani; A Kanetaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

Review 7.  Measuring biological age using omics data.

Authors:  Jarod Rutledge; Hamilton Oh; Tony Wyss-Coray
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Computed tomographic evaluation of the acetabulum for age estimation in an Indian population using principal component analysis and regression models.

Authors:  Varsha Warrier; Rutwik Shedge; Pawan Kumar Garg; Shilpi Gupta Dixit; Kewal Krishan; Tanuj Kanchan
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 2.791

9.  Biological age versus physical fitness age in women.

Authors:  E Nakamura; T Moritani; A Kanetaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

10.  Feature Selection Algorithms Enhance the Accuracy of Frailty Indexes as Measures of Biological Age.

Authors:  Sangkyu Kim; Jessica Fuselier; David A Welsh; Katie E Cherry; Leann Myers; S Michal Jazwinski
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 6.053

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.