Literature DB >> 35715653

Computed tomographic evaluation of the acetabulum for age estimation in an Indian population using principal component analysis and regression models.

Varsha Warrier1, Rutwik Shedge2, Pawan Kumar Garg3, Shilpi Gupta Dixit4, Kewal Krishan5, Tanuj Kanchan6.   

Abstract

The acetabulum presents as a well-preserved evidence, resistant to taphonomic degradation changes and can thus aid in the age estimation process. A CT-based examination of the acetabulum can further help simplify the process of age estimation by overcoming the time-consuming process of maceration and by doing away with the interference resulting from tissue remnants. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of the acetabulum for age estimation in an Indian population through a CT-based examination, using principal component analysis and regression models. CT images of 400 individuals aged 10 years and above were evaluated according to the features defined in the San-Millán-Rissech method of age estimation. Five of the seven morphological features defined by San-Millán-Rissech were appreciable on CT scans, and, to enable further statistical analysis, a cumulative score was computed using these five features. A significant correlation of 0.835 and 0.830 for the right and left acetabulum, respectively, was obtained between computed cumulative scores and chronological age of individuals. No significant sex differences were observed in the scoring of different age-related morphological changes. Regression models were generated using individual features and cumulative scores. Regression models derived using the cumulative score yielded inaccuracy values of 9.67 years for the right acetabulum and 9.15 years for the left acetabulum. Inaccuracy and bias values were computed for each individual feature, as well as for each decade, using mean point ages established within the original study. Amongst the various features, acetabular rim porosity was seen to have the lowest values of inaccuracy (11.50 years) and bias (2.32 years) and activity on outer edge of acetabular fossa the highest (inaccuracy and bias values of 22.36 years and 21.50 years, respectively). Taking into consideration this differential contribution towards age estimation, weighted coefficients and mean point ages for different morphological features were determined using principal component analysis. Subsequently, summary age models were generated from the obtained weighted coefficients and mean age values. Summary age models derived in the present study yield lower estimates of inaccuracy of 7.60 years for the right acetabulum and 7.82 years for the left acetabulum. While regression models derived in the present study allow for age estimation using even a single appreciable feature, summary age models take into account the contribution of each feature and generate more accurate estimates of age. Both statistical computations yield reduced error rates and thus can render greater applicability to the acetabulum in forensic age estimation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabulum; Age estimation; Computed tomography; Forensic anthropology; Human identification; Linear regression models; Principal component analysis; Summary age models

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35715653     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-022-02856-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.791


  31 in total

1.  Age estimation from the auricular surface of the ilium: a revised method.

Authors:  J L Buckberry; A T Chamberlain
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Using the acetabulum to estimate age at death of adult males.

Authors:  Carme Rissech; George F Estabrook; Eugenia Cunha; Assumpció Malgosa
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  A test of the revised auricular surface aging method on a modern European population.

Authors:  Konstantinos Moraitis; Eleni Zorba; Constantine Eliopoulos; Sherry C Fox
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 1.832

4.  A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample.

Authors:  Carme Rissech; Jeremy Wilson; Allysha Powanda Winburn; Daniel Turbón; Dawnie Steadman
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Bone age estimation with the Greulich-Pyle atlas using 3T MR images of hand and wrist.

Authors:  Thomas Widek; Pia Genet; Thomas Ehammer; Thorsten Schwark; Martin Urschler; Eva Scheurer
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  The iliac crest in forensic age diagnostics: evaluation of the apophyseal ossification in conventional radiography.

Authors:  Daniel Wittschieber; Volker Vieth; Christoph Domnick; Heidi Pfeiffer; Andreas Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Age estimation based on pelvic ossification using regression models from conventional radiography.

Authors:  Kui Zhang; Xiao-Ai Dong; Fei Fan; Zhen-Hua Deng
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  A Comparison of Different Age Estimation Methods of the Adult Pelvis.

Authors:  Molly Miranker
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 1.832

9.  Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: a new method for the determination of adult skeletal age at death.

Authors:  C O Lovejoy; R S Meindl; T R Pryzbeck; R P Mensforth
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Degenerative variance on age-related traits from pelvic bone articulations and its implication for age estimation.

Authors:  Vanessa Campanacho; Andrew T Chamberlain; Pia Nystrom; Eugénia Cunha
Journal:  Anthropol Anz       Date:  2020-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.