Nadia Khurshid 1 , Shehnaz Taing 2 , Ambreen Qureshi 2 , Insha Jan Khanyari 2 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Immediate post-placental IUD insertion is defined as IUD insertion within 10 min of the expulsion of the placenta. Although the expulsion rate in post-placental insertion is higher than interval insertion, the benefits of highly effective contraception immediately after delivery may outweigh the risks of expulsion. AIMS: To compare post-placental IUD (PPIUD) insertion with interval IUD insertion (IIUD) in terms of safety, effect on menstrual cycle, efficacy and satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After meeting all eligibility criteria, the patients were asked to choose between post-placental IUD insertion and interval/delayed IUD insertion. In PPIUD group, insertion was done within 10 min of expulsion of placenta by hand technique. Individuals in IIUD group were asked to return after 6 weeks for IUD insertion by withdrawal technique. Both the groups were followed at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months by history, physical examination, per speculum examination and ultrasonography. OBSERVATIONS: 238 patients were allocated to PPIUD group and 273 to IIUD group. In the PPIUD group, there was no bleeding/spotting demonstrable as it was masked by the lochia. Mild pain at insertion was seen in only 11 patients in the PPIUD group. Slight bleeding/spotting was seen in 7.8% patients in the IIUD group, while mild to moderate pain was seen in 39.9% patients. At 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year follow up with regard to patients complaining of pelvic pain/dysmenorrhea, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Our study found that irregular bleeding or spotting was more in interval insertion than in the post-placental group. The difference in the two groups was statistically significant at 6 weeks and 6 months, but was not significant at 1 year. There was no case of perforation in either group. Our study found a statistically significant difference in expulsion after post-placental compared to delayed insertion. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.006) for cumulative expulsion. However, for interval expulsion rate, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.6). In our study, continuation rates appear to be higher in the PPIUD group, but the difference is not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: PPIUD is a safe, easy and effective alternative to interval IUD insertion and qualifies to be popularized as a first-line contraceptive agent in eligible patients owing to its immediate and sustained contraceptive benefit, patient comfort, convenience and lower incidence of side effects. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2020.
ABSTRACT: Immediate post-placental IUD insertion is defined as IUD insertion within 10 min of the expulsion of the placenta. Although the expulsion rate in post-placental insertion is higher than interval insertion, the benefits of highly effective contraception immediately after delivery may outweigh the risks of expulsion. AIMS: To compare post-placental IUD (PPIUD) insertion with interval IUD insertion (IIUD) in terms of safety, effect on menstrual cycle, efficacy and satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After meeting all eligibility criteria, the patients were asked to choose between post-placental IUD insertion and interval/delayed IUD insertion. In PPIUD group, insertion was done within 10 min of expulsion of placenta by hand technique. Individuals in IIUD group were asked to return after 6 weeks for IUD insertion by withdrawal technique. Both the groups were followed at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months by history, physical examination, per speculum examination and ultrasonography. OBSERVATIONS: 238 patients were allocated to PPIUD group and 273 to IIUD group. In the PPIUD group, there was no bleeding/spotting demonstrable as it was masked by the lochia. Mild pain at insertion was seen in only 11 patients in the PPIUD group. Slight bleeding/spotting was seen in 7.8% patients in the IIUD group, while mild to moderate pain was seen in 39.9% patients. At 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year follow up with regard to patients complaining of pelvic pain/dysmenorrhea, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Our study found that irregular bleeding or spotting was more in interval insertion than in the post-placental group. The difference in the two groups was statistically significant at 6 weeks and 6 months, but was not significant at 1 year. There was no case of perforation in either group. Our study found a statistically significant difference in expulsion after post-placental compared to delayed insertion. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.006) for cumulative expulsion. However, for interval expulsion rate, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.6). In our study, continuation rates appear to be higher in the PPIUD group, but the difference is not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: PPIUD is a safe, easy and effective alternative to interval IUD insertion and qualifies to be popularized as a first-line contraceptive agent in eligible patients owing to its immediate and sustained contraceptive benefit, patient comfort, convenience and lower incidence of side effects. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2020.
Entities: Chemical
Keywords:
Contraception; Delayed IUCD; IUCD expulsion; Interval IUCD; Intrauterine contraceptive device; Post-placental
Year: 2020
PMID： 32255953 PMCID： PMC7109243 DOI： 10.1007/s13224-019-01299-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol India ISSN： 0975-6434