Literature DB >> 17046378

Comparison of efficacy and complications of IUD insertion in immediate postplacental/early postpartum period with interval period: 1 year follow-up.

Kafiye Eroğlu1, Gülcihan Akkuzu, Gülşen Vural, Berna Dilbaz, Ayşe Akin, Lale Taşkin, Ali Haberal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare immediate postplacental (IPP) and early postpartum (EP) intrauterine device (IUD) insertions with interval (INT) IUD insertions with respect to efficacy and complications.
METHODS: The study group consisted of 268 women in whom the following TCu 380A IUD insertions were performed: 84 IPP (less than 10 min), 46 EP (10 min to 72 h) and 138 INT (more than 6 weeks). The women were followed up 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after insertion. Complications and pregnancies encountered at the end of 1 year following IPP, EP and INT insertions were compared. The chi-square test and Fisher's Exact Test were used for the evaluation of the data.
RESULTS: Complications developed in 40.4% of the women in the IPP group, in 74.4% of the women in the EP group and in 19.2% of the women in the INT group (p<.001). Although no statistically significant difference was found between the groups for uterine perforation and infection (p>.001), there was a statistically significant difference between the groups in the incidence of complete and partial expulsion according to the time of IUD insertion. The overall cumulative pregnancy rate and frequency of pregnancy were found to be higher (p>.05 for both), which are both insignificant for the EP group (2 of 43 women), as compared with the INT (4 of 130 women) and IPP groups (2 of 84 women), and pregnancy rates at 1 year for all groups was 3.1% (8 of 257 women).
CONCLUSION: IPP and EP insertion of the TCu 380A IUD is an effective and convenient procedure, and expulsion rates in these groups are higher than in the INT group. Further studies are necessary to determine the cause of the higher expulsion rates and to find ways to reduce such rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17046378     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  26 in total

1.  Association of the Position of the Copper T 380A as Determined by the Ultrasonography Following its Insertion in the Immediate Postpartum Period with the Subsequent Complications: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Swati Gupta; Shashiprateek Malik; Renuka Sinha; Saritha Shyamsunder; M K Mittal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-04-23

2.  Clinical Outcome of Postplacental Copper T 380A Insertion in Women Delivering by Caesarean Section.

Authors:  Sunita Singal; Rekha Bharti; Rupali Dewan; Anjali Dabral; Achla Batra; Manjula Sharma; Pratima Mittal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

3.  Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Gurney; Sarita Sonalkar; Arden McAllister; Mary D Sammel; Courtney A Schreiber
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Beatrice A Chen; Matthew F Reeves; Jennifer L Hayes; Heather L Hohmann; Lisa K Perriera; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device.

Authors:  Bliss Kaneshiro; Tod Aeby
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

6.  Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Initiation With a 2- to 3-Week Compared With a 6-Week Postpartum Visit.

Authors:  Melissa J Chen; Melody Y Hou; Jennifer K Hsia; Catherine D Cansino; Juliana Melo; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah H Averbach; Yokabed Ermias; Gary Jeng; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Naomi K Tepper; Tara C Jatlaoui
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  A Decision Analysis Model of 1-Year Effectiveness of Intended Postplacental Compared With Intended Delayed Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion.

Authors:  Sarita Sonalkar; Tegan Hunter; Elizabeth P Gurney; Arden McAllister; Courtney A Schreiber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Maura K Whiteman; Gary Jeng; Naomi K Tepper; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: Safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability.

Authors:  Megan N Beatty; Paul D Blumenthal
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.