Literature DB >> 28826801

Postplacental intrauterine device expulsion by 12 weeks: a prospective cohort study.

Lisa M Goldthwaite1, Jeanelle Sheeder2, Jennifer Hyer3, Kristina Tocce2, Stephanie B Teal2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An intrauterine device placed immediately following a delivery can serve as an effective and safe contraceptive strategy in the postpartum period. There is limited evidence that the levonorgestrel intrauterine system may have a higher rate of expulsion compared to the copper intrauterine device; however, rates of expulsion for these 2 intrauterine device types have not been compared directly.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare expulsion rates by 12 weeks' postpartum for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine device. STUDY
DESIGN: We enrolled women who received postplacental intrauterine devices at 2 urban hospitals. Eligible women were ≥18 years old, English- or Spanish-speaking, with singleton vaginal delivery at ≥35 weeks' gestation. Intrauterine devices were inserted within 10 minutes of placental delivery by trained providers using ring forceps or the operator's hand. Intrauterine device location was evaluated via abdominal ultrasound at 24-48 hours' postpartum, and via transvaginal ultrasound 6 and 12 weeks later, categorizing position of the intrauterine device at the fundus, below the fundus but above the internal os, any part of the intrauterine device below the internal os (partial expulsion), or no intrauterine device visualized. Outcomes included intrauterine device expulsion and method continuation. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with expulsion.
RESULTS: We enrolled 123 women ages 18-40 years. Of these, 68 (55%) initiated levonorgestrel intrauterine system and 55 (45%) initiated copper intrauterine device. Groups were similar except more copper intrauterine device users were Hispanic (66% vs 38%) and fewer were primiparous (16% vs 31%). Among the 96 (78%) with 12-week follow-up, expulsion was higher for levonorgestrel intrauterine system users (21/55 or 38%) than for copper intrauterine device users (8/41 or 20%) (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-6.55; P = .05). At 24 hours' postpartum, there was no significant difference in median distance from the intrauterine device to the fundus between intrauterine device types or between those who did or did not experience expulsion. Of expulsions, 86% occurred ≤6 weeks' postpartum. All complete expulsions were clinically identified, but of the partial expulsions, only 4/10 (40%) were clinically suspected prior to ultrasound. The only independent predictor of expulsion was intrauterine device type. Including reinsertions, intrauterine device use at 12 weeks was not significantly different for levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine device users (80% vs 93%; P = .14).
CONCLUSION: Women initiating postplacental levonorgestrel intrauterine system are more likely to experience complete expulsion than those initiating copper intrauterine device. Using sonographic criteria results in higher expulsion rates than previously reported. It is unclear if such high expulsion rates would be identified following standard clinical practice.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intrauterine device; postpartum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28826801     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Gurney; Sarita Sonalkar; Arden McAllister; Mary D Sammel; Courtney A Schreiber
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah H Averbach; Yokabed Ermias; Gary Jeng; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Naomi K Tepper; Tara C Jatlaoui
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  A Decision Analysis Model of 1-Year Effectiveness of Intended Postplacental Compared With Intended Delayed Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion.

Authors:  Sarita Sonalkar; Tegan Hunter; Elizabeth P Gurney; Arden McAllister; Courtney A Schreiber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Maura K Whiteman; Gary Jeng; Naomi K Tepper; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Post-placental Intrauterine Device Insertion Versus Delayed Intrauterine Device Insertion: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Nadia Khurshid; Shehnaz Taing; Ambreen Qureshi; Insha Jan Khanyari
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-02-08

6.  Could EAISI-trained providers provide better quality of IUD services? Results of a secondary data analysis of complications as a proxy indicator.

Authors:  Manish Gehani; Manoj Pal; Anupama Arya; Shobhana Singh; Kaushik S; Kathryn A O'Connell; Levent Cagatay; Sumon Sengupta; Sunita Singal
Journal:  Gates Open Res       Date:  2019-09-17

7.  Postplacental Insertion of Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Versus Copper Intrauterine Device: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Elsayed Elshamy; Ahmed Nofal; Dalia Ibrrahim
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-01-20

8.  Women's Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Birth Timing and Birth Stopping.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Michael S Rendall; Polina Zvavitch
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2021-08-01

9.  Provision of immediate postpartum intrauterine contraception after vaginal birth within a public maternity setting: Health services research evaluation.

Authors:  Michelle Cooper; Kevin McGeechan; Anna Glasier; Shiona Coutts; Frances McGuire; Jeni Harden; Nicola Boydell; Sharon T Cameron
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Considerations on a new, frameless copper-releasing intrauterine system for intracesarean insertion and its future clinical significance: A review.

Authors:  Hazal Kutlucan; Recep Onur Karabacak; Dirk Wildemeersch
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2020-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.