Literature DB >> 32253214

Oral Fosfomycin Treatment for Enterococcal Urinary Tract Infections in a Dynamic In Vitro Model.

Iain J Abbott1,2, Elke van Gorp2, Aart van der Meijden2, Rixt A Wijma2,3, Joseph Meletiadis4, Jason A Roberts5,6,7,8, Johan W Mouton2, Anton Y Peleg9,10.   

Abstract

There are limited treatment options for enterococcal urinary tract infections, especially vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Oral fosfomycin is a potential option, although limited data are available guiding dosing and susceptibility. We undertook pharmacodynamic profiling of fosfomycin against E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates using a dynamic in vitro bladder infection model. Eighty-four isolates underwent fosfomycin agar dilution susceptibility testing (E. faecalis MIC50/90 32/64 μg/ml; E. faecium MIC50/90 64/128 μg/ml). Sixteen isolates (including E. faecalis ATCC 29212 and E. faecium ATCC 35667) were chosen to reflect the MIC range and tested in the bladder infection model with synthetic human urine (SHU). Under drug-free conditions, E. faecium demonstrated greater growth restriction in SHU compared to E. faecalis (E. faecium maximal growth 5.8 ± 0.6 log10 CFU/ml; E. faecalis 8.0 ± 1.0 log10 CFU/ml). Isolates were exposed to high and low fosfomycin urinary concentrations after a single dose, and after two doses given over two days with low urinary concentration exposure. Simulated concentrations closely matched the target (bias 2.3%). E. faecalis isolates required greater fosfomycin exposure for 3 log10 kill from the starting inoculum compared with E. faecium The ƒAUC0-72/MIC and ƒ%T > MIC0-72 for E. faecalis were 672 and 70%, compared to 216 and 51% for E. faecium, respectively. There was no rise in fosfomycin MIC postexposure. Two doses of fosfomycin with low urinary concentrations resulted in equivalent growth inhibition to a single dose with high urinary concentrations. With this urinary exposure, fosfomycin was effective in promoting suppression of regrowth (>3 log10 kill) in the majority of isolates.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterococcus; fosfomycin; in vitro modelling; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; synthetic human urine; urinary tract infection; vancomycin resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32253214      PMCID: PMC7269476          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00342-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  55 in total

Review 1.  Global epidemiology of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Zafer Tandogdu; Florian M E Wagenlehner
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.915

2.  A simple dilution analog computer for simulation of drug distribution processes.

Authors:  E L Rowe; W Morozowich
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 3.  Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options.

Authors:  Ana L Flores-Mireles; Jennifer N Walker; Michael Caparon; Scott J Hultgren
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 4.  Combatting resistant enterococcal infections: a pharmacotherapy review.

Authors:  Nicholas J Mercuro; Susan L Davis; Marcus J Zervos; Erica S Herc
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.889

5.  In-vitro activity of nitrofurantoin in enterococcus urinary tract infection.

Authors:  T Butt; M J Leghari; A Mahmood
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.781

6.  Experience with fosfomycin for treatment of urinary tract infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Neuner; Jennifer Sekeres; Gerri S Hall; David van Duin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Determination of the Dynamically Linked Indices of Fosfomycin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Hollow Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  Arnold Louie; Michael Maynard; Brandon Duncanson; Jocelyn Nole; Michael Vicchiarelli; G L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Phase I Study To Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Dosing Regimens of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Healthy Adult Participants.

Authors:  Eric Wenzler; Susan C Bleasdale; Monica Sikka; Kristen L Bunnell; Matthew Finnemeyer; Susan L Rosenkranz; Larry H Danziger; Keith A Rodvold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Oral Fosfomycin Efficacy with Variable Urinary Exposures following Single and Multiple Doses against Enterobacterales: the Importance of Heteroresistance for Growth Outcome.

Authors:  Iain J Abbott; Elke van Gorp; Rixt A Wijma; Joseph Meletiadis; Jason A Roberts; Johan W Mouton; Anton Y Peleg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Epistasis between antibiotic tolerance, persistence, and resistance mutations.

Authors:  Irit Levin-Reisman; Asher Brauner; Irine Ronin; Nathalie Q Balaban
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dose Optimization of Combined Linezolid and Fosfomycin against Enterococcus by Using an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model.

Authors:  Jun Mao; Ting Li; Na Zhang; Shuaishuai Wang; Yaowen Li; Yu Peng; Huiping Liu; Guang Yang; Yisong Yan; Lifang Jiang; Yanyan Liu; Jiabin Li; Xiaohui Huang
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-12-01

2.  Pharmacodynamics of Linezolid Plus Fosfomycin Against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  Shuaishuai Wang; Huiping Liu; Jun Mao; Yu Peng; Yisong Yan; Yaowen Li; Na Zhang; Lifang Jiang; Yanyan Liu; Jiabin Li; Xiaohui Huang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 3.  The Role of PK/PD Analysis in the Development and Evaluation of Antimicrobials.

Authors:  Alicia Rodríguez-Gascón; María Ángeles Solinís; Arantxa Isla
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.321

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.