Literature DB >> 31907184

Oral Fosfomycin Efficacy with Variable Urinary Exposures following Single and Multiple Doses against Enterobacterales: the Importance of Heteroresistance for Growth Outcome.

Iain J Abbott1,2, Elke van Gorp2, Rixt A Wijma2,3, Joseph Meletiadis4, Jason A Roberts5,6,7,8, Johan W Mouton2, Anton Y Peleg9,10.   

Abstract

Oral fosfomycin trometamol is licensed as a single oral dose for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections, with activity against multidrug-resistant uropathogens. The impact of interindividual variability in urinary concentrations on antimicrobial efficacy, and any benefit of giving multiple doses, is uncertain. We therefore performed pharmacodynamic profiling of oral fosfomycin, using a dynamic bladder infection in vitro model, to assess high and low urinary exposures following a single oral dose and three repeat doses given every 72 h, 48 h, and 24 h against 16 clinical isolates with various MICs of fosfomycin (8 Escherichia coli, 4 Enterobacter cloacae, and 4 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates). Baseline fosfomycin high-level-resistant (HLR) subpopulations were detected prior to drug exposure in half of the isolates (2 E. coli, 2 E. cloacae, and 4 K. pneumoniae isolates; proportion, 1 × 10-5 to 5 × 10-4% of the total population). Fosfomycin exposures were accurately reproduced compared to mathematical modeling (linear regression slope, 1.1; R 2, 0.99), with a bias of 3.8% ± 5.7%. All 5/5 isolates with MICs of ≤1 μg/ml had no HLR and were killed, whereas 8/11 isolates with higher MICs regrew regardless of exposure to high or low urinary concentrations. A disk diffusion zone of <24 mm was a better predictor for baseline HLR and regrowth. Administering 3 doses with average exposures provided very limited additional kill. These results suggest that baseline heteroresistance is important for treatment response, while increased drug exposure and administering multiple doses may not be better than standard single-dose fosfomycin therapy.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PK/PD; antimicrobial resistance; fosfomycin; in vitro model; urinary tract infection

Year:  2020        PMID: 31907184      PMCID: PMC7038273          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01982-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  52 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Single-Dose Intravenous (ZTI-01) and Oral Fosfomycin in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  E Wenzler; E J Ellis-Grosse; K A Rodvold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Relationship between Fosfomycin Exposure and Amplification of Escherichia coli Subpopulations with Reduced Susceptibility in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  Brian VanScoy; Jennifer McCauley; Sujata M Bhavnani; Evelyn J Ellis-Grosse; Paul G Ambrose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  The revival of fosfomycin.

Authors:  Argyris S Michalopoulos; Ioannis G Livaditis; Vassilios Gougoutas
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Role of inoculum and mutant frequency on fosfomycin MIC discrepancies by agar dilution and broth microdilution methods in Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M Ballestero-Téllez; F Docobo-Pérez; J M Rodríguez-Martínez; M C Conejo; M S Ramos-Guelfo; J Blázquez; J Rodríguez-Baño; A Pascual
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 5.  Resistance to fosfomycin: Mechanisms, Frequency and Clinical Consequences.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Florentia Athanasaki; Georgios L Voulgaris; Nikolaos A Triarides; Konstantinos Z Vardakas
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 5.283

6.  Fosfomycin efficacy and emergence of resistance among Enterobacteriaceae in an in vitro dynamic bladder infection model.

Authors:  Iain J Abbott; Joseph Meletiadis; Imane Belghanch; Rixt A Wijma; Lamprini Kanioura; Jason A Roberts; Anton Y Peleg; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 7.  Fosfomycin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing, Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Antonia C Kastoris; Anastasios M Kapaskelis; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 25.071

8.  Fosfomycin distribution in the lower urinary tract after administration of fosfomycin trometamol salt.

Authors:  F Scaglione; F Cicchetti; G Demartini; M Arcidiacono
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Res       Date:  1994

9.  Oral fosfomycin for the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis.

Authors:  Ilias Karaiskos; Lambrini Galani; Vissaria Sakka; Aikaterini Gkoufa; Odysseas Sopilidis; Dimitrios Chalikopoulos; Gerasimos Alivizatos; Eleni Giamarellou
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 10.  Oral and intravenous fosfomycin in complicated urinary tract infections.

Authors:  I López-Montesinos; J P Horcajada
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.553

View more
  5 in total

1.  Activity of fosfomycin and amikacin against fosfomycin-heteroresistant Escherichia coli strains in a hollow-fiber infection model.

Authors:  I Portillo-Calderón; M Ortiz-Padilla; B de Gregorio-Iaria; V Merino-Bohorquez; J Blázquez; J Rodríguez-Baño; J M Rodríguez-Martínez; A Pascual; F Docobo-Pérez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Oral Fosfomycin Treatment for Enterococcal Urinary Tract Infections in a Dynamic In Vitro Model.

Authors:  Iain J Abbott; Elke van Gorp; Aart van der Meijden; Rixt A Wijma; Joseph Meletiadis; Jason A Roberts; Johan W Mouton; Anton Y Peleg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Antimicrobial Treatment Options for Difficult-to-Treat Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Cystitis, Pyelonephritis, and Prostatitis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Andrew Chou; Elwyn Welch; Andrew Hunter; Barbara W Trautner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 11.431

4.  Fosfomycin susceptibility of uropathogens at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital.

Authors:  Lesego M Mothibi; Norma N Bosman; Trusha Nana
Journal:  S Afr J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-26

Review 5.  Treatment options for K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii co-resistant to carbapenems, aminoglycosides, polymyxins and tigecycline: an approach based on the mechanisms of resistance to carbapenems.

Authors:  Stamatis Karakonstantis; Evangelos I Kritsotakis; Achilleas Gikas
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.553

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.