Literature DB >> 29891606

Phase I Study To Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Dosing Regimens of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Healthy Adult Participants.

Eric Wenzler1, Susan C Bleasdale2, Monica Sikka2, Kristen L Bunnell1, Matthew Finnemeyer3, Susan L Rosenkranz3, Larry H Danziger1,2, Keith A Rodvold4,2.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of two repeated dosing regimens of oral fosfomycin tromethamine were evaluated in 18 healthy adult subjects. Subjects received 3 g every other day (QOD) for 3 doses and then every day (QD) for 7 doses, or vice versa, in a phase I, randomized, open-label, two-period-crossover study. Serial blood (n = 11) and urine (n = 4 collection intervals) samples were collected before and up to 24 h after dosing on days 1 and 5, along with predose concentrations on days 3 and 7. PK parameters were similar between days 1 and 5 within and between dosing regimens. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) PK parameters for fosfomycin in plasma on day 5 during the respective QOD and QD dosing regimens were as follows: maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) = 24.4 ± 6.2 versus 23.8 ± 5.6 μg/ml, time to Cmax (Tmax) = 2.2 ± 0.7 versus 2.0 ± 0.4 h, apparent volume of distribution (V/F) = 141 ± 67.9 versus 147 ± 67.6 liters, apparent clearance (CL/F) = 21.4 ± 8.0 versus 20.4 ± 5.3 liters/h, renal clearance (CLR) = 7.5 ± 4.1 versus 7.3 ± 3.5 liters/h, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) = 151.6 ± 35.6 versus 156.6 ± 42.5 μg · h/ml, and elimination half-life (t1/2) = 4.5 ± 1.1 versus 5.0 ± 1.7 h. Urine concentrations peaked at approximately 600 μg/ml through the 0- to 8-h urine collection intervals but displayed significant interindividual variability. Roughly 35 to 40% of the 3-g dose was excreted in the urine by 24 h postdose. No new safety concerns were identified during this study. The proportion of diarrhea-free days during the study was significantly lower with the QD regimen than with the QOD regimen (61% versus 77%; P < 0.0001). Further studies to establish the clinical benefit/risk ratio for repeated dosing regimens of oral fosfomycin tromethamine are warranted. (This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02570074.).
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antimicrobial safety; fosfomycin; pharmacokinetics; safety; tolerability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29891606      PMCID: PMC6105781          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00464-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  19 in total

Review 1.  International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Kalpana Gupta; Thomas M Hooton; Kurt G Naber; Björn Wullt; Richard Colgan; Loren G Miller; Gregory J Moran; Lindsay E Nicolle; Raul Raz; Anthony J Schaeffer; David E Soper
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Fosfomycin in the treatment of extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli-related lower urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Husnu Pullukcu; Meltem Tasbakan; Oguz Resat Sipahi; Tansu Yamazhan; Sohret Aydemir; Sercan Ulusoy
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 3.  Fosfomycin versus other antibiotics for the treatment of cystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Evridiki K Vouloumanou; Antonios G Togias; Maria Karadima; Anastasios M Kapaskelis; Petros I Rafailidis; Stavros Athanasiou
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 4.  Fosfomycin.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Evridiki K Vouloumanou; George Samonis; Konstantinos Z Vardakas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  High interindividual variability in urinary fosfomycin concentrations in healthy female volunteers.

Authors:  R A Wijma; B C P Koch; T van Gelder; J W Mouton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Monuril in lower uncomplicated urinary tract infections in adults.

Authors:  M Moroni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Degree of absorption, pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin trometamol and duration of urinary antibacterial activity.

Authors:  T Bergan
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Comparative study of fosfomycin activity in Mueller-Hinton media and in tissues.

Authors:  G A Dette; H Knothe; B Schönenbach; G Plage
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Trometamol-fosfomycin (Monuril) bioavailability and food-drug interaction.

Authors:  E Bergogne-Bérézin; C Muller-Serieys; M L Joly-Guillou; N Dronne
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Evaluation of three-dose fosfomycin tromethamine in the treatment of patients with urinary tract infections: an uncontrolled, open-label, multicentre study.

Authors:  Lu-Dong Qiao; Bo Zheng; Shan Chen; Yong Yang; Kai Zhang; Hong-Feng Guo; Bo Yang; Yuan-Jie Niu; Yi Wang; Ben-Kang Shi; Wei-Min Yang; Xiao-Kun Zhao; Xiao-Feng Gao; Ming Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  7 in total

1.  Ex Vivo Urinary Bactericidal Activity and Urinary Pharmacodynamics of Fosfomycin after Two Repeated Dosing Regimens of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Healthy Adult Subjects.

Authors:  E Wenzler; K M Meyer; S C Bleasdale; M Sikka; R E Mendes; K L Bunnell; M Finnemeyer; S L Rosenkranz; L H Danziger; K A Rodvold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Oral Fosfomycin Treatment for Enterococcal Urinary Tract Infections in a Dynamic In Vitro Model.

Authors:  Iain J Abbott; Elke van Gorp; Aart van der Meijden; Rixt A Wijma; Joseph Meletiadis; Jason A Roberts; Johan W Mouton; Anton Y Peleg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Unexpected Activity of Oral Fosfomycin against Resistant Strains of Escherichia coli in Murine Pyelonephritis.

Authors:  Annabelle Pourbaix; François Guérin; Charles Burdet; Laurent Massias; Françoise Chau; Vincent Cattoir; Bruno Fantin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Fosfomycin vs Ertapenem for Outpatient Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Noah Wald-Dickler; Todd C Lee; Soodtida Tangpraphaphorn; Susan M Butler-Wu; Nina Wang; Tyler Degener; Carolyn Kan; Matthew C Phillips; Edward Cho; Catherine Canamar; Paul Holtom; Brad Spellberg
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 5.  Differences in Fosfomycin Resistance Mechanisms between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales.

Authors:  Dina Zheng; Phillip J Bergen; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Elizabeth B Hirsch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.938

6.  Oral Fosfomycin Efficacy with Variable Urinary Exposures following Single and Multiple Doses against Enterobacterales: the Importance of Heteroresistance for Growth Outcome.

Authors:  Iain J Abbott; Elke van Gorp; Rixt A Wijma; Joseph Meletiadis; Jason A Roberts; Johan W Mouton; Anton Y Peleg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Oral fosfomycin activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae in a dynamic bladder infection in vitro model.

Authors:  Iain J Abbott; Elke van Gorp; Kelly L Wyres; Steven C Wallis; Jason A Roberts; Joseph Meletiadis; Anton Y Peleg
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.758

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.