Literature DB >> 22133793

Corneal densitometry as an indicator of corneal health.

Ahmad Muneer Otri1, Usama Fares, Mouhamed A Al-Aqaba, Harminder S Dua.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish prospectively the normal values of corneal density of healthy subjects using the Pentacam Scheimpflug system (Oculus, Inc., Wetzlar, Germany) and to investigate alteration in corneal density during active and healed stages of bacterial keratitis.
DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: Sixty-four eyes of 40 healthy controls and 36 eyes of 35 patients with bacterial keratitis were studied.
METHODS: This study was conducted at the Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom. A Pentacam system was used to study corneal density. Corneal densitometry readings in subjects with bacterial keratitis were recorded during the active stage and 4 to 6 weeks after complete healing. Densitometry was recorded at the site of infection and at a point in clear cornea furthest away from the infectious infiltrate. Corneal thickness also was measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Densitometry values of normal cornea, at the site of corneal ulcer or abscess, and at a distant point of clear cornea during active and healed keratitis.
RESULTS: The mean densitometry value of normal corneas was 12.3 ± 2.4. In infectious keratitis, the densitometry values were greatest at the site of the active infection and significantly more than in controls. The densitometry values at the points of clear cornea furthest away from the site of infection also were significantly higher than in controls during active disease, but failed to return to normal values, despite complete resolution of infection. The density of the infiltrates was much higher than that of residual scars after healing of ulcers. No correlation was found between the pachymetry and the densitometry values.
CONCLUSIONS: Densitometry of active infectious corneal infiltrates is more than that resulting from the corneal scarring after healing. Persistent increase in density of clear cornea furthest away from the focus of corneal infection suggests that the host response extends beyond the immediate area of infection and indeed may occur through the entire cornea. These changes persist beyond 4 weeks of healing, which was the duration of follow-up of this study. Densitometry can be used as an objective measure of the corneal response to infection and to monitor response to therapy. Copyright Â
© 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22133793     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  42 in total

1.  Evaluation of topographic, tomographic, topometric, densitometric, and aberrometric features of cornea with pentacam HR system in subclinical keratoconus.

Authors:  Haci Hasan Ozkan; Mustafa Koc; Hasan Kiziltoprak; Kemal Tekin; Emre Aydemir
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Cytotoxic activity and degradation patterns of structural proteins by corneal isolates of Acanthamoeba spp.

Authors:  Viviane Peracini Sant'ana; Linda Christian Carrijo-Carvalho; Annette Silva Foronda; Ana Marisa Chudzinski-Tavassi; Denise de Freitas; Fábio Ramos Souza de Carvalho
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Corneal densitometry after photorefractive keratectomy, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, and small-incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  F Poyales; N Garzón; J Mendicute; I Illarramendi; P Caro; O Jáñez; F Argüeso; A López
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Assessment of corneal backward light scattering in the healthy cornea and factors affecting corneal transparency.

Authors:  Ali Bulent Cankaya; Kemal Tekin; Hasan Kiziltoprak; Sevilay Karahan; Pelin Yilmazbas
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Corneal Light Scatter After Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kristin E Hirabayashi; Winston Chamberlain; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Ariana Austin; Laurel Stell; Charles C Lin
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 6.  [Corneal densitometry : Value for keratoconus diagnostics].

Authors:  M Alnawaiseh; N Eter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Comparison of corneal haze and visual outcome in primary DSAEK versus DSAEK following failed DMEK.

Authors:  Francisco Arnalich-Montiel; José L Hernández-Verdejo; Noelia Oblanca; Francisco J Muñoz-Negrete; Maria P De Miguel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Corneal densitometry evaluation in archipelago keratitis.

Authors:  Faik Orucoglu; Serap Talaz; Ali Aksu; Orkun Muftuoglu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Association of Postfungal Keratitis Corneal Scar Features With Visual Acuity.

Authors:  Shivali A Menda; Manoranjan Das; Arun Panigrahi; N Venkatesh Prajna; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman; Stephen D McLeod; Jeremy D Keenan
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

10.  Influence of peripheral corneal relaxing incisions during cataract surgery for corneal astigmatism up to 2.5 dioptres on corneal densitometry.

Authors:  Ieva Zukaite; Kaveeta K Bedi; Shahnaz Ali; Mayank A Nanavaty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.