| Literature DB >> 32238920 |
Hirofumi Mukai1, Takeshi Yamaguchi2, Masato Takahashi3, Yasuo Hozumi4, Tomomi Fujisawa5, Shozo Ohsumi6, Hiromitsu Akabane7, Reiki Nishimura8, Tsutomu Takashima9, Youngjin Park10, Yasuaki Sagara11, Tatsuya Toyama12, Shigeru Imoto13, Toshiro Mizuno14, Satoshi Yamashita15, Satoshi Fujii16, Yukari Uemura17.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of a therapeutic strategy that switches chemotherapy, based on Ki-67 tumour expression after initial therapy, relative to that of standard chemotherapy, has not been evaluated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32238920 PMCID: PMC7283228 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0815-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Fig. 1CONSORT diagram for this study.
PTX, paclitaxel; EC, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide; T, trastuzumab.
Baseline characteristics of the study population.
| Total ( | Control arm ( | Ki-67 response-guided arm ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | |||||||
| Age, years | Median (range) | 57.3 (25–75) | 56.7 (25–72) | 58.3 (31–75) | 0.115 | ||||
| Pretreatment Ki-67 index* | Mean (SD) | 51.8 (17.8) | 49.9 (16.6) | 53.6 (18.8) | 0.150 | ||||
| Tumour size by palpation, (cm) | Mean (SD) | 4.2 (2.8) | 3.8 (1.6) | 4.5 (3.5) | 0.0752 | ||||
| Clinical tumour stage† | cT1 | 16 | 8.0 | 11 | 11.0 | 5 | 5.0 | 0.403 | |
| cT2 | 145 | 72.5 | 70 | 70.0 | 75 | 75.0 | |||
| cT3 | 26 | 13.0 | 12 | 12.0 | 14 | 14.0 | |||
| cT4 | 10 | 5.0 | 6 | 6.0 | 4 | 4.0 | |||
| NA | 3 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 2.0 | |||
| Clinical nodal status† | cN0 | 73 | 36.5 | 32 | 32.0 | 41 | 41.0 | 0.124 | |
| cN1 | 99 | 49.5 | 55 | 55.0 | 44 | 44.0 | |||
| cN2 | 16 | 8.0 | 5 | 5.0 | 11 | 11.0 | |||
| cN3 | 12 | 6.0 | 8 | 8.0 | 4 | 4.0 | |||
| Clinical stage† | I | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.481 | |
| IIA | 80 | 40.0 | 37 | 37.0 | 43 | 43.0 | |||
| IIB | 68 | 34.0 | 37 | 37.0 | 31 | 31.0 | |||
| IIIA | 32 | 16.0 | 14 | 14.0 | 18 | 18.0 | |||
| IIIB | 7 | 3.5 | 3 | 3.0 | 4 | 4.0 | |||
| IIIC | 13 | 6.5 | 9 | 9.0 | 4 | 4.0 | |||
| Histology | Ductal invasive | 185 | 92.5 | 92 | 92.0 | 93 | 93.0 | 0.845 | |
| Lobular invasive | 7 | 3.5 | 3 | 3.0 | 4 | 4.0 | |||
| Other | 8 | 4.0 | 5 | 5.0 | 3 | 3.0 | |||
| Hormone status†,‡ | Receptor | ER−/PgR− | 91 | 45.5 | 45 | 45.0 | 46 | 46.0 | 1.000 |
| ER−/PgR+ | 5 | 2.5 | 3 | 3.0 | 2 | 2.0 | |||
| ER+/PgR− | 37 | 18.5 | 18 | 18.0 | 19 | 19.0 | |||
| ER+/PgR+ | 67 | 33.5 | 34 | 34.0 | 33 | 33.0 | |||
SD standard deviation, NA not available.
*Central assessment.
†TNM classification (7th edition).
‡Local assessment.
**Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, T test for continuous variables.
Fig. 2Distribution of the Ki-67 index.
At pretreatment (a) and interim assessment (b). The change in the distribution of the Ki-67 reduction rate from before treatment to interim Ki-67 assessment (c). SD, standard deviation.
Pathological complete response rate in each arm among Ki-67 early non-responders and responders.
| Total | pCR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | 95% CI | ||||
| Control arm ( | Ki-67 early non-responder* | 59 | 26 | 44.1 | 31.4–56.7 |
| Ki-67 early responder | 21 | 10 | 47.6 | 26.3–69.0 | |
| Ki-67 response-guided arm ( | Ki-67 early non-responder† | 55 | 13 | 23.6 | 12.4–34.9 |
| Ki-67 early responder‡ | 20 | 8 | 40.0 | 18.5–61.5 | |
pCR pathological complete response, CI confidence interval.
Pathological response was not available in *one patient, †two patients and ‡one patient.
Fig. 3Relationship between Ki-67 reduction rate and pCR rate in each arm.
The number above each bar denotes “the number of patients with pCR/all patients”.
Comparison of Ki-67 and tumour size in pCR and non-pCR patients.
| Patients with pCR | Patients with non-pCR | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | (Q1, median, Q3) | Mean | SD | (Q1, median, Q3) | ||||
| Interim Ki-67 index | 58 | 18.8 | 16.9 | (10.0, 19.7, 30.0) | 94 | 22.6 | 16.8 | (5.3, 14.3, 25.6) | 0.064‡ |
| Ki-67 reduction rate (%) | 57 | 64.6 | 28.2 | (31.2, 59.8, 76.5) | 94 | 49.6 | 40.3 | (47.2, 71.1, 83.3) | 0.0058‡ |
| Interim tumour size (cm)* | 52 | 2.2 | 1.3 | (1.5, 2.0, 3.0) | 80 | 2.9 | 1.7 | (1.9, 2.5, 3.6) | 0.015† |
| Tumour size reduction rate (%) | 50 | 45.1 | 26.2 | (33.3, 40.0, 54.0) | 79 | 30.9 | 25.3 | (12.5, 28.6, 42.9) | 0.0027† |
pCR pathological complete response, SD standard deviation, Q1 1st quartile, Q3 3rd quartile.
*Determined by palpation. †Wilcoxon test. ‡T test.