Literature DB >> 11881912

Prognostic significance of tumor cell proliferation analyzed in fine needle aspirates from primary breast cancer.

A M Billgren1, E Tani, A Liedberg, L Skoog, L E Rutqvist.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the role of proliferating fraction (PF) measured with Ki-67/MIB-1 antibody in a large series of preoperative fine-needle aspirate (FNA) biopsies as a prognosticator of disease recurrence. The study comprised 732 patients who all had a conclusive cytological diagnosis of breast cancer. The follow-up time ranged from 1.2 to 10.2 years with a median of 5.7 years. In multivariate analysis Ki-67/MIB-1 value was a strong (p < 0.001) significant, prognosticator of disease recurrence free interval (DRFI) independent of lymph node status, progesterone receptor content, and tumor size. In the subgroup analysis of 430 node-negative patients the distant recurrence-free rate after 5 years was 94.4% in patients with Ki-67/MIB-1 value < 15% compared to 88.7% in patients with Ki-67/MIB-1 value > or = 15% (p = 0.03). Test of the interaction between tumor size and the value of PF revealed a p-value of 0.06. If the patients, in addition, had a tumor size >20 mm the distant recurrence-free rate after 5 years was 93.2% if Ki-67/MIB-1 < 15% compared to 80.7% in patients with Ki-67/MIB-1 value > or = 15%. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). For patients with tumors <20mm Ki-67/MIB-1 value did not add any prognostic information. In the subgroup of 302 node-positive patients the distant recurrence-free rate after 5 years was 86.0% in patients with Ki-67/MIB-1 value < 15% compared to 70.6% in patients with Ki-67/MIB-1 value > or = 15% (p < 0.01). We conclude that PF assessed by Ki-67/MIB-1 antibodies in preoperative FNA biopsies has a significant prognostic value independent of lymph node status, PgR status and tumor size. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating PF, which can contribute prognostic information when analyzed in preoperative smears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11881912     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013899614656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  5 in total

1.  [A plea for cytopathology].

Authors:  P Dalquen
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  The use of digital images improves reproducibility of the ki-67 labeling index as a proliferation marker in breast cancer.

Authors:  András Vörös; Erika Csörgő; Bence Kővári; Péter Lázár; Gyöngyi Kelemen; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 3.  Ki-67: level of evidence and methodological considerations for its role in the clinical management of breast cancer: analytical and critical review.

Authors:  Elisabeth Luporsi; Fabrice André; Frédérique Spyratos; Pierre-Marie Martin; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Laurent Arnould; Anne Gompel; Caroline Egele; Bruno Poulet; Krishna B Clough; Hubert Crouet; Alain Fourquet; Jean-Pierre Lefranc; Carole Mathelin; Nicolas Rouyer; Daniel Serin; Marc Spielmann; Margaret Haugh; Marie-Pierre Chenard; Etienne Brain; Patricia de Cremoux; Jean-Pierre Bellocq
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Clinical and Cyto-Morphological Characterization of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Chayanika Kala; Mohd Athar; Sanjay Kala; Lubna Khan; Ramendra K Jauhari; Amitabh Satsangi
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12,155 patients.

Authors:  E de Azambuja; F Cardoso; G de Castro; M Colozza; M S Mano; V Durbecq; C Sotiriou; D Larsimont; M J Piccart-Gebhart; M Paesmans
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.