Literature DB >> 24002511

Response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Gunter von Minckwitz1, Jens Uwe Blohmer, Serban Dan Costa, Carsten Denkert, Holger Eidtmann, Wolfgang Eiermann, Bernd Gerber, Claus Hanusch, Jörn Hilfrich, Jens Huober, Christian Jackisch, Manfred Kaufmann, Sherko Kümmel, Stefan Paepke, Andreas Schneeweiss, Michael Untch, Dirk Michael Zahm, Keyur Mehta, Sibylle Loibl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 2,072 patients with two cycles of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) and randomly assigned early responders to four (n = 704) or six (n = 686) additional TAC cycles, and early nonresponders to four cycles of TAC (n = 321) or vinorelbine and capecitabine (NX; n = 301) before surgery.
RESULTS: DFS was longer in early responders receiving TAC × 8 than in those receiving TAC × 6 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97; P = .026), and in early nonresponders receiving TAC-NX than in those receiving TAC × 6 (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.82; P = .001). Exploratory analysis showed that DFS after response-guided chemotherapy (TAC × 8 or TAC-NX) was significantly longer (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.85; P < .003), as was OS (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99; P = .048), than on conventional chemotherapy (TAC × 6). DFS was longer after response-guided chemotherapy in all hormone receptor-positive tumors (luminal A HR = 0.55, luminal B [human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative] HR = 0.40, and luminal B [HER2 positive] HR = 0.56), but not in hormone receptor-negative tumors (HER2 positive [nonluminal] HR = 1.01 and triple negative HR = 0.87). Pathologic complete response did not predict these survival effects. pCR predicted an improved DFS in triple-negative (HR = 6.67), HER2-positive (nonluminal; HR 5.24), or luminal B (HER2-negative) tumors (HR = 3.74).
CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis suggests that response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy might improve survival and is most effective in hormone receptor-positive tumors. If confirmed, the response-guided approach could provide a clinically meaningful advantage for the neoadjuvant over the adjuvant approach in early breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24002511     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.0940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  110 in total

Review 1.  Management of locally advanced breast cancer-perspectives and future directions.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Elzbieta Senkus; Maria J Cardoso; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Established Concepts and Emerging Strategies.

Authors:  Tessa G Steenbruggen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Carolien H Smorenburg; Gabe S Sonke
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Image Registration for Microwave Tomography of the Breast Using Priors From Nonsimultaneous Previous Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Gregory Boverman; Cynthia E L Davis; Shireen D Geimer; Paul M Meaney
Journal:  IEEE J Electromagn RF Microw Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-27

Review 4.  Adding Adjuvant Systemic Treatment after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: Review of the Data.

Authors:  Shetal A Patel; Angela DeMichele
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline.

Authors:  S Gandhi; G G Fletcher; A Eisen; M Mates; O C Freedman; S F Dent; M E Trudeau
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Intratumoral Immunotherapy for Early-stage Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Wan Xing Hong; Sarah Haebe; Andrew S Lee; C Benedikt Westphalen; Jeffrey A Norton; Wen Jiang; Ronald Levy
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Biology and Management of Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-11

Review 8.  Ki67--no evidence for its use in node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Fabrice Andre; Monica Arnedos; Aicha Goubar; Amal Ghouadni; Suzette Delaloge
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Combined use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI for response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kenneth E Pengel; Bas B Koolen; Claudette E Loo; Wouter V Vogel; Jelle Wesseling; Esther H Lips; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Marie Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Impact of race, ethnicity, and BMI on achievement of pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a pooled analysis of four prospective Alliance clinical trials (A151426).

Authors:  Erica T Warner; Karla V Ballman; Carrie Strand; Judy C Boughey; Aman U Buzdar; Lisa A Carey; William M Sikov; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.