Ryuichi Nishii1, Tsuneo Saga2, Hitomi Sudo3, Takashi Togawa4, Junpei Kuyama5, Toshiaki Tani6, Takamasa Maeda6, Masato Kobayashi7, Toshihiko Iizasa5, Masato Shingyoji5, Makiko Itami5, Kazunori Kawamura8, Hiroki Hashimoto8, Kana Yamazaki3, Kentaro Tamura3, Tatsuya Higashi3. 1. Department of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan. nishii.ryuichi@qst.go.jp. 2. Department of Advanced Medical Imaging Research, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 ShogoinKawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. 3. Department of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital for JFCR, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. 5. Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho Chuo-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan. 6. Radiological Technology Section, QST Hospital, Quantum Medical Science Directorate, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan. 7. School of Health Sciences, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa, 920-0942, Japan. 8. Department of Advanced Nuclear Medicine Sciences, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of [11C]4DST uptake in patients with lung nodules, including benign and malignant tumors, and to assess the correlation between [11C]4DST uptake and proliferative activity of tumors in comparison with [18F]FDG uptake. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (22 males and 4 females, mean age of 65.5-year-old) were analyzed in this prospective study. Patients underwent [11C]4DST and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging on the same day. Diagnosis of each lung nodule was confirmed by histopathological examination of tissue specimens at surgery, or during clinical follow-up after the PET/CT studies. To assess the utility of the semi-quantitative evaluation method, the SUVmax was calculated of [11C]4DST and [18F]FDG uptake by the lesion. Proliferative activities of each tumor as indicated by the immunohistochemical Ki-67 index was also estimated using surgical specimens of patients. Then the relationship between the SUVmax of both PET/CT and the Ki-67 index was examined. Furthermore, the relationship between the uptake of [11C]4DST or [18F]FDG and the histopathological findings, the clinical stage, and the clinical outcome of patients were also assessed. RESULTS: There was a positive linear relationship between the SUVmax of [11C]4DST images and the Ki-67 index (Correlation coefficients = 0.68). The SUVmax of [11C]4DST in the 26 lung nodules were 1.65 ± 0.40 for benign lesions, 3.09 ± 0.83 for adenocarcinomas (P < 0.001 between benign and adenocarcinoma), and 2.92 ± 0.58 for SqCCs (P < 0.001 between benign and SqCC). Whereas, the SUVmax of [18F]FDG were 2.38 ± 2.27 for benign lesions, 6.63 ± 4.24 for adenocarcinomas (n.s.), and 7.52 ± 2.84 for SqCCs (n.s.). The relationship between TNM tumor stage and the SUVmax of [11C]4DST were 2.54 ± 0.37 for T1, 3.48 ± 0.57 for T2, and 4.17 ± 0.72 for T3 (P < 0.005 between T1 and T2, and P < 0.001 between T1 and T3). In comparison with the TNM pathological stage, SUVmax of [11C]4DST were 2.63 ± 0.49 for stage I, 3.36 ± 0.23 for stage II, 3.40 ± 1.12 for stage III, and 4.65 for stage IV (P < 0.05 between stages I and II). In comparison of the clinical outcome, the SUVmax of [11C]4DST were 2.72 ± 0.56 for the no recurrence (No Rec.) group, 3.10 ± 0.33 for the recurrence-free with adjuvant chemotherapy after the surgery (the No Rec. Adjv. CTx. group) and 4.66 ± 0.02 for the recurrence group (Rec. group) (P < 0.001 between the No Rec and Rec. groups, and P < 0.005 between the No Rec. Adjv. CTx. and Rec. groups). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT with [11C]4DST is as feasible for imaging of lung tumors as [18F]FDG PET/CT. For diagnosing lung tumors, [11C]4DST PET is useful in distinguishing benign nodules from malignancies. [11C]4DST uptake in lung carcinomas is correlated with the proliferative activity of tumors, indicating a promising noninvasive PET imaging of DNA synthesis in malignant lung tumors.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of [11C]4DST uptake in patients with lung nodules, including benign and malignant tumors, and to assess the correlation between [11C]4DST uptake and proliferative activity of tumors in comparison with [18F]FDG uptake. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (22 males and 4 females, mean age of 65.5-year-old) were analyzed in this prospective study. Patients underwent [11C]4DST and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging on the same day. Diagnosis of each lung nodule was confirmed by histopathological examination of tissue specimens at surgery, or during clinical follow-up after the PET/CT studies. To assess the utility of the semi-quantitative evaluation method, the SUVmax was calculated of [11C]4DST and [18F]FDG uptake by the lesion. Proliferative activities of each tumor as indicated by the immunohistochemical Ki-67 index was also estimated using surgical specimens of patients. Then the relationship between the SUVmax of both PET/CT and the Ki-67 index was examined. Furthermore, the relationship between the uptake of [11C]4DST or [18F]FDG and the histopathological findings, the clinical stage, and the clinical outcome of patients were also assessed. RESULTS: There was a positive linear relationship between the SUVmax of [11C]4DST images and the Ki-67 index (Correlation coefficients = 0.68). The SUVmax of [11C]4DST in the 26 lung nodules were 1.65 ± 0.40 for benign lesions, 3.09 ± 0.83 for adenocarcinomas (P < 0.001 between benign and adenocarcinoma), and 2.92 ± 0.58 for SqCCs (P < 0.001 between benign and SqCC). Whereas, the SUVmax of [18F]FDG were 2.38 ± 2.27 for benign lesions, 6.63 ± 4.24 for adenocarcinomas (n.s.), and 7.52 ± 2.84 for SqCCs (n.s.). The relationship between TNM tumor stage and the SUVmax of [11C]4DST were 2.54 ± 0.37 for T1, 3.48 ± 0.57 for T2, and 4.17 ± 0.72 for T3 (P < 0.005 between T1 and T2, and P < 0.001 between T1 and T3). In comparison with the TNM pathological stage, SUVmax of [11C]4DST were 2.63 ± 0.49 for stage I, 3.36 ± 0.23 for stage II, 3.40 ± 1.12 for stage III, and 4.65 for stage IV (P < 0.05 between stages I and II). In comparison of the clinical outcome, the SUVmax of [11C]4DST were 2.72 ± 0.56 for the no recurrence (No Rec.) group, 3.10 ± 0.33 for the recurrence-free with adjuvant chemotherapy after the surgery (the No Rec. Adjv. CTx. group) and 4.66 ± 0.02 for the recurrence group (Rec. group) (P < 0.001 between the No Rec and Rec. groups, and P < 0.005 between the No Rec. Adjv. CTx. and Rec. groups). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT with [11C]4DST is as feasible for imaging of lung tumors as [18F]FDG PET/CT. For diagnosing lung tumors, [11C]4DST PET is useful in distinguishing benign nodules from malignancies. [11C]4DST uptake in lung carcinomas is correlated with the proliferative activity of tumors, indicating a promising noninvasive PET imaging of DNA synthesis in malignant lung tumors.
Authors: Stephen Deppen; Joe B Putnam; Gabriela Andrade; Theodore Speroff; Jonathan C Nesbitt; Eric S Lambright; Pierre P Massion; Ron Walker; Eric L Grogan Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 4.330