Lili Chan1, Akhil Vaid, Girish N Nadkarni. 1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine The Charles Bronfman Institute of Personalized Medicine The Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health The BioMe Phenomics Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The universal adoption of electronic health records, improvement in technology, and the availability of continuous monitoring has generated large quantities of healthcare data. Machine learning is increasingly adopted by nephrology researchers to analyze this data in order to improve the care of their patients. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we provide a broad overview of the different types of machine learning algorithms currently available and how researchers have applied these methods in nephrology research. Current applications have included prediction of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease along with progression of kidney disease. Researchers have demonstrated the ability of machine learning to read kidney biopsy samples, identify patient outcomes from unstructured data, and identify subtypes in complex diseases. We end with a discussion on the ethics and potential pitfalls of machine learning. SUMMARY: Machine learning provides researchers with the ability to analyze data that were previously inaccessible. While still burgeoning, several studies show promising results, which will enable researchers to perform larger scale studies and clinicians the ability to provide more personalized care. However, we must ensure that implementation aids providers and does not lead to harm to patients.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The universal adoption of electronic health records, improvement in technology, and the availability of continuous monitoring has generated large quantities of healthcare data. Machine learning is increasingly adopted by nephrology researchers to analyze this data in order to improve the care of their patients. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we provide a broad overview of the different types of machine learning algorithms currently available and how researchers have applied these methods in nephrology research. Current applications have included prediction of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease along with progression of kidney disease. Researchers have demonstrated the ability of machine learning to read kidney biopsy samples, identify patient outcomes from unstructured data, and identify subtypes in complex diseases. We end with a discussion on the ethics and potential pitfalls of machine learning. SUMMARY: Machine learning provides researchers with the ability to analyze data that were previously inaccessible. While still burgeoning, several studies show promising results, which will enable researchers to perform larger scale studies and clinicians the ability to provide more personalized care. However, we must ensure that implementation aids providers and does not lead to harm to patients.
Authors: Christopher W Seymour; Jason N Kennedy; Shu Wang; Chung-Chou H Chang; Corrine F Elliott; Zhongying Xu; Scott Berry; Gilles Clermont; Gregory Cooper; Hernando Gomez; David T Huang; John A Kellum; Qi Mi; Steven M Opal; Victor Talisa; Tom van der Poll; Shyam Visweswaran; Yoram Vodovotz; Jeremy C Weiss; Donald M Yealy; Sachin Yende; Derek C Angus Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Volodymyr Mnih; Koray Kavukcuoglu; David Silver; Andrei A Rusu; Joel Veness; Marc G Bellemare; Alex Graves; Martin Riedmiller; Andreas K Fidjeland; Georg Ostrovski; Stig Petersen; Charles Beattie; Amir Sadik; Ioannis Antonoglou; Helen King; Dharshan Kumaran; Daan Wierstra; Shane Legg; Demis Hassabis Journal: Nature Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kelly H Zou; Simon K Warfield; Aditya Bharatha; Clare M C Tempany; Michael R Kaus; Steven J Haker; William M Wells; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ron Kikinis Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Travers Ching; Daniel S Himmelstein; Brett K Beaulieu-Jones; Alexandr A Kalinin; Brian T Do; Gregory P Way; Enrico Ferrero; Paul-Michael Agapow; Michael Zietz; Michael M Hoffman; Wei Xie; Gail L Rosen; Benjamin J Lengerich; Johnny Israeli; Jack Lanchantin; Stephen Woloszynek; Anne E Carpenter; Avanti Shrikumar; Jinbo Xu; Evan M Cofer; Christopher A Lavender; Srinivas C Turaga; Amr M Alexandari; Zhiyong Lu; David J Harris; Dave DeCaprio; Yanjun Qi; Anshul Kundaje; Yifan Peng; Laura K Wiley; Marwin H S Segler; Simina M Boca; S Joshua Swamidass; Austin Huang; Anthony Gitter; Casey S Greene Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 4.293
Authors: Maximilian Legnar; Philipp Daumke; Jürgen Hesser; Stefan Porubsky; Zoran Popovic; Jan Niklas Bindzus; Joern-Helge Heinrich Siemoneit; Cleo-Aron Weis Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-07-15